Winter Is Coming, and It’s About Time HBO Changed Its Game Plan

Vinyl HBO
Courtesy of HBO

HBO has had some rocky times of late, but at least in cancelling “Vinyl,” it made a Sansa decision, not a Jon Snow decision.

In the most recent episode of “Game of Thrones,” HBO’s flagship drama, Sansa did something that was deeply unpalatable to her in order to serve a larger purpose. But her brother, Jon Snow, made some calls that simply weren’t pragmatic given the reality he faced.

Cancelling the flawed “Vinyl” was the right move, and one that might indicate that the network is finally ready to fight a realistic battle with the army it has and the tactics it needs.

For years, once it had established itself as House Prestige with “Sex and the City” and “The Sopranos,” HBO resided in the kind of lofty tower that allowed it to gaze upon the TV fray from afar. Like the Lannisters, the HBO clan only moved with the most connected movers and shakers, and it typically had the largest purse in the land.

But now it’s down in the muck with everyone else, just trying to survive — and, to be clear, it should. A TV scene with a strong, vital HBO taking chances and making risky, challenging fare makes my job much easier. TV is undisputably better with the network in fighting form. 

As in Westeros, the previous ways of doing things just don’t work anymore. Formerly solid hierarchies are coming down fast, and winter is not coming — for TV, it’s already here, in the form of fractured audiences, evolving tastes and ever-changing revenue streams. And to be fair, HBO is not the only network that appears to want to make it 2006 again through science or magic. AMC’s tepid “Feed the Beast” is straight out of the anti-hero bargain bin, as is Showtime’s “Roadies,” and TNT’s lackluster “Animal Kingdom” feels similarly retro. The old ways die hard. 

The fact that the network bet so big on “Vinyl” in the first place was somewhat troubling. It’s smart of new HBO president Casey Bloys, via this cancellation, to rein in the network’s “talent friendly” reputation a bit, because “Vinyl” was all over the map, a mishmash that didn’t seem to know what it wanted to be. Of course the network should never rule out working with ambitious auteurs, but letting creatives run the show entirely is like to going into battle with only half the forces you need. It’s unlikely to end well. 

There are no White Walkers streaming down from the North (unless there’s something terrifying happening under the radar in Canada), but that role in the TV industry is more or less filled by Netflix. Like the White Walkers, Netflix is relentless and not about to slow down. It has altered almost every basic paradigm — sometimes for the better, sometimes not — and the company is not terribly concerned with how that plays out for anyone else. To extend the imperfect analogy, the deep-pocketed Amazon is not unlike Daenerys’ dragons: House Bezos is untamed, sometimes sluggish and frequently unpredictable, but Amazon Studios is another another force capable of bringing great and possibly terrifying change.

These seismic shifts are not just affecting HBO, which saw the exits of Michael Lombardo and Michael Ellenberg. Just in 2016, Steve Mosko exited Sony Television, which was reorganized after he left. Bela Bajaria left Universal TV, and a new regime has taken over at ABC as well. 

Of course, executives play musical chairs all the time in the TV industry, but this wave of shakeups feels like something else. The entertainment industry is doing two things simultaneously: It’s recognized just how important and lucrative TV is, and it is trying to extract ever-greater piles of money from it, and simultaneously, it’s trying to crack the code of how TV will work in the non-linear, streaming world, in which schedules and affiliates matter less and subscribers and binging patterns often matter more. It’s a confusing time, and a much more competitive one; the amount of TV being made has doubled in the last few years, and Peak TV shows no sign of contracting any time soon.

That’s a lot of change to try to absorb, and trying to negotiate all those transitions has had an impact on HBO. In the last year or two, shows have come and gone earlier than expected (“Togetherness,” “Getting On” and “Looking,” which airs a wrap-up movie soon); unaired programs have had bumpy rides (“Westworld,” the Lewis and Clark miniseries); once-lauded shows have hit stumbling blocks (“True Detective”); and others (“Girls,” “The Leftovers” and “Game of Thrones”) will soon set finale dates. 

Does some of the churn at HBO arise from taking big swings? Sure. And might the network have some things in its pipeline that will grab the public’s attention (and that of the media — after all, the thinkpiece-industrial complex is almost as important to HBO)? That’s quite likely. After “The Sopranos” went off the air and “John From Cincinnati” crashed and burned, the network debuted “True Blood,” which went on to be the kind of buzzworthy drama the network thrives on, as well as a host of well-regarded half-hours, including “Veep,” “Silicon Valley,” and some of the shows named above. A few years ago, “Luck” also only survived for only one season, but it debuted the same year as “Game of Thrones,” which has conquered popular culture. And coming next month is “The Night Of,” from writer-director Steven Zaillian, which brings tremendous buzz.  

But the big changes at HBO seem frankly overdue, given that Netflix and Amazon have been power players for a few years now. They’re not the only causes of deep and lasting alterations in the industry, where competition gets fiercer by the day. But there are so many entities competing to make good and great TV now — basic-cable networks, premium cable networks, streaming networks and possibly your dry cleaner — that radical shifts were inevitable. The terrain has changed, and HBO has been playing catchup. Today’s move may indicate it’s playing a deeper, savvier, long-term game. 

HBO, like every other network, can’t keep fighting the last war. In the game of TV, after all, you win or you die.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 13

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. I was there in the 70s. I loved the idea. But the show was lackluster in the extreme, with a lot of lazy ‘star impersonations’ and only a very few pieces of gripping drama (Andrew Dice Clay was a mile away the best character/actor in the series.) as ever, I’m afraid Mr Scorsese’s women were gratingly thinly played and plotted. And… Wolf of Wall Street? had all of the same problems, squashed into a smaller budget. Could it just be down to (excruciatingly) bad writing? Props to Juno Temple and the Young Jagger – pretty good attempt to get some chemistry, but sloppy scripts. A great shame about the only noteworthy black character in the film being ‘sacrificed’. The music industry? It’s really not that interesting. Watch ‘Get Shorty’ instead. HBO did the smart thing. Now can we finally have a GOOD 70s rock series?

  2. john says:

    vinyl is dynamic, fun and a breath of fresh air amongst all that smog all other station are shoving down our throats. HBO is making a big mistake on this one. Sounds like some new jackass just stepped in who obviously was never a part of that era and wouldn’t understand a good series show if it paraded nude in front of them. i got the solution….let’s say ‘yes to the dress’ and have ‘man tracker’ hunt down ‘duck dynasty’ so they can be ‘naked and alone’ with ‘the bachelor’ and ‘the bachelorette’!!! HBO you might as well jump right into bed with all of them. I wish you would reconsider.

  3. Tell It says:

    Game of Thrones just hasn’t been as interesting this season.

  4. “Let’s make a Sansa decision and kill rock and roll from tv, because that’s pratical”.
    You are a horrible person.

  5. Iván el Terrible says:

    HBO, why did you reject Guillermo del Toro’s Monster? It’s a great manga which could be a great series in the suitable hands, perhaps you didn’t want a rival for your Game of Dungs.

  6. Bernard says:

    HBO sadly finds itself in a similar position to AMC: total reliance on one show. Vinyl had a ton of potential but the showrunners wasted the talented cast with a chaotic plot. There has got to be script out there for Bobby Cannavale. The guy has immense talent.

  7. Manuel says:

    HBO needs a new amazing show and I think Westworld isn’t be a hit.

  8. troydarling says:

    With “Vinyl” they forgot that anti-heroes as protagonists require something about them that you root for. I didn’t even get the impression that he was ever even good at his job. Canceling it was the right call.

    • K says:

      This right here. There were myriad problems with Vinyl (fractured narrative, lifeless scripts, misused music, miscast actors, etc) but the fundamental flaw was that the anti-hero had no redeeming qualities. The crutch most commonly used is family, as with Ray’s character in Goodfellas, Robert’s in Casino, Tony’s in Sopranos and so on. They all did bad but ultimately you felt sympathy when they put on their parental hat – they had tough familial situations, something a lot of the audience can identify with. Vinyl’s protagonist seemingly didn’t give a damn about his family. His only goal was simply to do drugs and make money, and even then by way of screwing over musicians. There wasn’t anything to get behind. Similarly, I felt the same way with Marty’s Wolf of Wall Street. You can’t feel sympathetic for a self-centered douchebag when their entire raison d’etre is screwing people over for their own gains while giving nothing back or showing the smallest sign of owning up to responsibilities. That’s needed for a well-rounded character. Couple that with the poor ratings, and HBO made the sensible move. You can’t twiddle your thumbs waiting for a show’s ROI while hemorrhaging money to pay for its production/promotion. Casey was practical, and that’s what HBO needs right now.

  9. jim says:

    I thought vinyl was good is started out all over the place but had good ideas. Telling tales from r&r history was cool but there were so many subplots. I watch GOT and used to watch rome tuned in for the whole season of vinyl. Now with that gone whats left?

  10. HBIC says:

    Ryan’s last few articles have been a bit of a mess. Please stop the GoT references and try to curb your politics. It is boring and lazy.

  11. hkkaufman says:

    What is the purpose of your Article? “OPINIONS VARY”

  12. Matchbox says:

    Showtime’s Roadies comes from the “anti-hero bargain bin”? Is this author smoking crack? Whether or not it’s a good show, there is nothing dark or anti-hero about Roadies (unlike Vinyl, which IS about a dark anti-hero). Roadies is a sentimental Cameron Crowe show about “feeling the music, man”. And it certainly doesn’t look cheap either — it looks like a big-budget Hollywood film. That said, yes, the author is correct in pinning the “anti-hero bargain bin” insult to TNT’s Animal Kingdom…

More TV News from Variety