Film Review: ‘Lazy Eye’

'Lazy Eye' review: an intricate gay

Tim Kirkman's drama about two men who reunite after 15 years is so well-written and acted you feel like you're eavesdropping.

Movies, as scholars of Hitchcock and De Palma like to say, are a voyeuristic medium. But as soon as you say the word “voyeuristic,” it sounds like you’re talking about something sensational and titillating — i.e., sex. An indie drama like “Lazy Eye,” by contrast, is voyeuristic, but in a far more refined and emotionally sophisticated way. The movie does have moments of raw sex. Mostly, though, we’re at a weekend-getaway cabin in the middle of the Mojave Desert, watching and listening to Dean (Lucas Near-Verbrugghe), a pensively handsome Los Angeles graphic designer, play host to Alex (Aaron Costa Ganis), whom he had a serious fling with 15 years before, back when they were young bucks who picked each other up at an East Village dive bar and whiled away a carefree no-budget romantic summer together in New York City.

The two haven’t spoken since (for reasons the movie fills in slowly), but as they sit around now, talking about life, art, sex, love, work, real estate, the ethics of lying, the pull of creativity versus the lust for security, the whirlpool of marriage, and how, after all these years (which have melted away in the blink of an eye), the two actually feel about each other, you’re teased and tugged along by their conversation in a way that can only be called…voyeuristic. But that’s all because of how juicy and lifelike the talk is. The writer-director, Tim Kirkman, who made the acclaimed 1997 documentary “Dear Jesse” as well as the vibrant and touching Southern ensemble drama “Loggerheads,” creates Dean and Alex as vividly believable characters, so that the audience just about leans in to catch every detail of what they’re saying, the jokes and anecdotes and occasionally bitchy back-and-forth jabs. “Lazy Eye” makes you realize how rare it is to see a movie, even an indie movie, that gives you the privilege of listening to authentically smart conversation. The understated flow of talk makes us feel like we’re eavesdropping.

It helps that Dean and Alex are witty and highly self-aware men, and that both are intensely likable. That feels like a subtle subversion of formula, since in this kind of voluble two-hander, it often works out that one of the characters is the “problematic” one — neurotic, untrustworthy, difficult to deal with — while the other one is the more tolerant and humane. Dean and Alex are different: They’re heartfelt dudes with a genuine edge to them, so the drama of who’s wrong and who’s right, who’s worldly and who’s naïve, keeps taking unexpected spins. It’s worth noting, too, that while both characters are gay, there isn’t a moment when that spawns an “issue.” The two discuss marriage, having kids, etc., in the spirit of those things being part of a world that they can count on.

At one point, they reminisce about their first date, when Dean took the two of them to see his all-time favorite movie, “Harold and Maude.” Alex, he can now reveal, hated it, which for a moment turns Dean apoplectic with defensiveness about his beloved cult movie anthem. The funny thing is, Alex’s thoughts on the film are actually more perceptive. The tables get turned in other ways. The film springs a major surprise about Dean’s relationship status, and Alex gets high and mighty about it, yet he himself has never been with anyone for long, which raises the question: Is he a guy who can’t commit? Or has he been holding out, all these years, for his romantic memories of Dean? Even though he has only just realized it now? “Lazy Eye” catches how the rhythms of love interact — sometimes awkwardly, sometimes impossibly — with the rhythms of growing up.

A movie like this one wouldn’t work if the actors were anything less than inspired, and Lucas Near-Verbrugghe and Aaron Costa Ganis are both so good that by the end of the film they feel like new friends you’ve made. Near-Verbrugghe, with his quick and slightly guarded acuity, suggests a more intellectually perky Guy Pearce, and Costa Ganis gives Alex a dark-humored sensual vibrancy. The mark of how beautifully these two work together is that Dean and Alex are, at times, nearly compulsive about revealing themselves, yet even when they’re doing that there’s something held in reserve — by the actors, and by Kirkman’s filmmaking. It’s not just the piece of information that we haven’t heard yet; it’s the thrumming mystery of how they feel. The Mojave settings are magnificent, and they lend the film some real visual flavor, even if the photography is a little too functional. “Lazy Eye” is a small-scale movie, but there are far bigger dramas that don’t leave this kind of afterglow.

Film Review: 'Lazy Eye'

Reviewed on-line, Los Angeles, July 15, 2016. MPAA Rating: Not rated. Running time: 90 Min. (At Outfest.)


A T42 Entertainment production, in association with Sugarloaf Productions, Shawn & John Productions, 5 Child Productions, LLC. Produced by Todd Shotz, Tim Kirkman. Executive producers, John Ainsworth, Gill Holland, Zvi Howard Rosenman, Leesa Wagner. Co-executive producers, Kelly Woyan, Ian Reinhard. Co-producers, Veronica Amick-Becerra, David Jennis.


Directed, written by Tim Kirkman. Camera (color, widescreen), Gabe Mayhan; editor, Caitlin Dixon; production designer, Frances Lynn Hernandez; costume designer, Wendy Chuck; music, Steven Argila; casting, Judith Sunga.


Lucas Near-Verbrugghe, Aaron Costa Ganis, Michaela Watkins, Drew Barr, Debbie Jaffe, Michael Rubenstone, Harrison Givens, Renée Willett.
Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 8

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Joe Ledesma says:

    I watched this movie twice, first with my spouse then alone. I dont know why certain people thought the movie somehow unbelievale and the characters unlikeable, but i had a very strong emotional reaction to it. Yes, i felt i was eavesdropping..thats how intimate, realistic and intelligent the dialogue was. It also helps of course that the actors are quite easy on the eyes in a believable way, no muscle daddies here….just handsome and appealing men. The ending was heartbreaking and also emotionally healing. Bravo!

  2. David says:

    I was so moved by this movie. I’m in similar situation where I feel haunted by the ghosts of my past exes and sometimes feel I want to contact them and catch up. But I know it won’t end up well. I loved the ending of the movie. I feel inspired by it. :) So glad I got to see this movie. I felt like it was written specifically for me!!!
    And the chemistry between the actors was amazing, I assumed the actors were gay.

  3. Coll says:

    While it took a little while for this movie to kick into gear, there was a subtle, yet potent, emotional punch to reward you by the end. Great chemistry and dialogue between the leads definitely reeled one in and gave heft to an otherwise charming exposition of the “what if” relationships of the past.

  4. Dave G. says:

    Not only did I think this was poorly written, acted and unbelievable, I knew the actors were straight from the very beginning. I have no problem if a straight actor plays a gay role, but they better be able to show their love for each other and kiss like Jake Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger.

  5. Chris P. says:

    Tim Kirkman is a great writer/director, but I have to be honest: it annoys the hell out of me that all of his movies about gay guys are always cast with straight actors.

  6. Bill B. says:

    Sounds like an eventual must see to me.

  7. Phil says:

    Unbelievable story line, characters not easy to like, beautiful setting in the desert, well-made, very well acted, but it winds up being a so-so film because it is hard to believe that 15 years later, for reasons the film gradually gives you, these guys would act and react this way.

  8. Jack Monte says:

    Variety can you just pay out this idiot’s contract and get someone to replace Glib Man?

More Film News from Variety