Box Office: ‘Jason Bourne’ Scores With $60 Million Debut, ‘Bad Moms’ Hits Big

Jason Bourne Movie
Courtesy of Universal

Audiences turned out in force to see Matt Damon in “Jason Bourne,” pushing the spy sequel to a sterling $60 million debut.

The film marked the actor’s return to the action franchise after a nine-year hiatus, during which he repeatedly hinted that he might be done with his most popular role. He and director Paul Greengrass argued that 2007’s “The Bourne Ultimatum” had brought the character full circle by filling in him on the shadowy bureaucratic maneuvers that transformed him into a killing machine. What was left?

Be it creative spark or big paydays, the pair were somehow lured back to the series. That’s good news for Universal, which ran the risk of losing a Tiffany franchise without Damon’s involvement. In the interim, the studio had made an ill-conceived attempt at cinematic universe building with “The Bourne Legacy,” introducing Jeremy Renner as another amnesic ass-kicker dubbed Aaron Cross. The crowds didn’t exactly flock to see this sub-Bourne, and the film grossed about $150 million less than “The Bourne Ultimatum” globally.


Jason Bourne

Jason Bourne: More Than a Rerun, Because He’s Never Been More Relevant

As a sign of Damon’s appeal, audience surveys reveal that the actor’s presence above-the-title was the second most frequently cited reason that people turned up for “Jason Bourne.”

“It’s no secret that people were anticipating a reunion of [Damon and Greengrass],” said Nick Carpou, Universal’s domestic distribution chief, adding “Putting the team back together made smart business sense.”

“Jason Bourne” marks the series’ second highest opening, behind “The Bourne Ultimatum’s” $69.3 million debut. When adjusted for inflation, however, it trails all but “The Bourne Legacy’s” opening weekends. Universal spent $120 million to make the latest installment and released it in 4,026 theaters.

“It proves that this is a franchise that’s still viable and that it can continue if they want to keep making them,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at ComScore. “‘Jason Bourne’ is the perfect title for this film, because that’s who everyone wanted to see return.”

Aaron Cross…not so much.

Even with Bourne’s resurgence commanding most of the attention, the weekend’s other major new wide release managed to score a respectable debut. STX Entertainment’s “Bad Moms” opened to a healthy $23.4 million and a third place finish. That’s a strong return on the film’s $20 million production budget. It also gives STX Entertainment a much needed win after its other summer release, the Civil War drama “Free State of Jones” collapsed at multiplexes.

“Bad Moms” originally was set up at Paramount Pictures and was intended to star Leslie Mann with the actress’ husband and frequent collaborator Judd Apatow producing. But Mann dropped out, as did Apatow, and the project migrated to STX. It stars Mila Kunis, Kristen Bell, and Kathryn Hahn as women who reject the pressure to be perfect parents, and instead indulge in hard partying and a more relaxed, Chablis-fueled approach to child-rearing.

“It is a terrific movie that has a lot of heart and a lot of laughs and it plays great across the board,” said Kevin Grayson, STX’s domestic distribution chief.

Grayson believes the film will continue to draw crowds in the coming weeks, because there are no other raunchy comedies with female leads on deck. That could help the picture withstand “Suicide Squad’s” opening next weekend. The comic book movie is tracking to open to as much as $125 million, establishing a new record for an August launch.

STX is the brainchild of Robert Simonds, the producer of “Cheaper by the Dozen” and “The Pink Panther” films. Armed with backing from the likes of TPG Growth, Hony Capital and Huayi Brothers, the studio has ambitions to spend as much as $1.1 billion annually on producing, marketing and self-distributing its films by 2017. So far, its early efforts have been mixed. It scored with low-budget horror films such as “The Gift” and “The Boy,” but lost money on the thriller “The Secret in Their Eyes” and the point-of-view action film “Hardcore Henry.”

Among newcomers, Lionsgate fielded “Nerve,” a $20 million thriller about a digital truth or dare-style game that takes a deadly turn. The film stars Dave Franco and Emma Roberts. It opened Wednesday in order to get a jumpstart on the competition, earning $15 million over its first five days and $9 million over the weekend.

“We felt the best approach was to let the movie do the heavy lifting and let word of mouth carry it,” said David Spitz, co-president of domestic theatrical distribution at Lionsgate. “If you read all the comments whether it’s on Instagram or Facebook or Twitter, the response is amazing. The audience loves the film. “

In holdover news, Paramount’s “Star Trek Beyond” slipped roughly 60% in its second weekend to gross  $24 million and nab second place. That brings the sci-fi sequel’s domestic haul to $105.7 million. With a hefty $185 million budget, the film needs to resonate overseas if it wants to make a profit, because, as it stands, that kind of a result doesn’t justify sequels or guarantee profits.

Illumination and Universal’s “The Secret Life of Pets” continues to be one of the biggest hits of the summer. The animated offering took fourth place with $18.2 million. The look at what pets do when their owners are at work has earned $296.2 million and seems destined to inspire more installments in the furry friend saga. After shattering records in 2015, Universal got off to a more modest start this year, with films like “The Huntsman: Winter’s War” and “Warcraft” failing to catch fire. However, the studio has bounced back in recent weeks, revived by the success of “The Secret Life of Pets” and “Jason Bourne.”

“Lights Out,” a horror film from New Line, rounded out the top five, picking up $10.8 million to bring its total to $42.8 million after two weeks.

On the art house front, Summit and Roadside Attractions opened “Indignation” to $89,072, for a $22,268 per-screen average. The drama about a precocious college student who clashes with the conservative head of his college marks the directorial debut of former Focus chief James Schamus.

“Gleason,” a documentary about New Orleans Saints player Steve Gleason struggles with ALS, had a strong debut, picking up $93,933 from nine locations for a per-screen average of $10,437. Amazon bought the film out of the Sundance Film Festival and is releasing it in partnership with Open Road.

This summer has been a mixed bag from a box office perspective. The industry has been in a funk as high-profile films such as “Alice Through the Looking Glass,” “The Legend of Tarzan,” and “The BFG” have flopped. However, this weekend’s receipts are an improvement on the year ago period when “Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation” led the box office. Sales are up roughly 30% thanks to  the one-two punch of “Jason Bourne” and “Bad Moms.”

“We’re starting to chip away at the summer deficit,” said Dergarabedian. “Maybe with ‘Suicide Squad’ opening, we’ll see the end to all this volatility.”



Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 15

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Robert E Morrison says:

    Maybe because i am 88 and never saw the previous Bourne flicks, but i found this movie to be one of the worst time consuming, fairy tales about good guys and bad guys and mysterious guys that I have ever seen. A total waste.

  2. adam says:

    Yikes. Almost a 60% drop for Star Trek Beyond from its first to second weekend and its box office take is already significantly trailing behind the previous two JJ Abrams films. I think Paramount must be in panic mode right now.

  3. Dave says:

    Ghostbusters is conspicuously missing from this discussion

    • mjlambert1 says:

      Yep. Knocked out of the top five, and curiously omitted from the films listed as the year’s flops. It’s only now made back 158 mill when it needs 500 mill to be profitable.

  4. Horatio says:

    “The Legend of Tarzan” only made about 100 Million at the Domestic Box Office, which isn’t that impressive for a 180 Million Dollar movie, that was supposed to generate sequels, but the International numbers look pretty well. My question: Is there still something to get from the international Box Office for “Tarzan”? Right now, it made about 300 Million Worldwide. Is that as good as it will get for this movie?

    Another question: “GhostBusters” made about 150 Million at the Domestic B.O., but the international numbers look horrifying. Is there still more to get for “GhostBusters” or is this it?

    • adam says:

      Where did you get 150 mil from for Ghostbusters? According to boxofficemojo it’s only made 106 million domestically so far.

  5. S.U.M.1 H.A.S.2 PAY says:

    STAR TREK BEYOND managed to hold onto 2nd place afterall, thanks to the BAD MOMS collapse over the course of the weekend. While 2nd place is still really good for STAR TREK BEYOND , it should be performing even better. Perhaps strong word of mouth will enable it to continue to fight for big audiences, but that remains to be seen. Right now a $200 million domestic haul is looking iffy. It needed to be closer to $140 million rather than the $110 million side of the numbers.

    • adam says:

      ST Beyond dropped 60% from its opening weekend and it is performing well below the previous two Trek films. There’s no way to make a positive spin here.

  6. J says:

    “Moms” did pretty much as well as you would expect an R-rated summer comedy to do with zero competition in its genre. Too bad “for profit” entertainment, in addition to being the worst it has ever been, is just a wasting of resources as people die of a lack of materials around the world. LMAO.

  7. JimG. says:

    Illumination is Universal’s Pixar without the huge budgets (and as a result without the attention to detail and storytelling that make Pixar’s films better). They are helping Uni’s bottom line the way Pixar did Disney’s when it needed it the most (although its own animation studio has been on a roll since Tangled). And like Pixar Illumination can fill their theme parks as well what with Pets rumored to replace Shrek at Orlando to make for a very Illuminating entrance (although that’s looking more odd what with Uni’s deal with DreamWorks). And like Pixar IE right now can’t do any wrong (although I’m sure they’ll have a The Good Dinosuar in their future as well although it took Pixar 20 years to get there).

  8. Jo Johns says:

    This is why the ‘great unwashed’ and movie makers alike love them so much.

    Where is my sarcasm font?! Haven’t we been asking for this long enough?

  9. Dean says:

    Movie critics have more of a love of film than the average person. That’s why they review films. They’ve studied film for the most part and are certainly more qualified to judge a film than the great unwashed.

  10. steve says:

    Movie critics are like sports critics – never played the game. Just stay on the sidelines grinning. Of course they will never be remembered – that’s the beauty of it. Can’t remember a single review of any dead critic.

More Film News from Variety