How ’13 Hours’ Tries to Get at the Truth of Benghazi

13 hours
Courtesy of Paramount

Michael Bay’s “13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi” opens with the message, “This is a true story.”

In other words, not “based on a true story,” but “a true story.”

Given the political controversy that has swirled around the events of the Benghazi attacks for more than three years, the movie is destined to be heavily scrutinized for how it portrays the team of six security contractors housed at a secret CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya. It shows how they put their lives on the line to respond to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the nearby diplomatic compound.

The contractors have said that they wanted to see their story told on screen because the politics surrounding Benghazi have obscured the actual events on the ground that evening as well as the lives that were lost. Four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, were killed.

“Probably the biggest challenge was remaining completely true to the events that transpired that night,” said producer Erwin Stoff. “Any time you are doing a real story or a true story, there is that temptation to say, ‘Well, it would be better if this would happen or that would happen.’ But there is not a thing in this movie that is not verifiable by two or more sources.”

The movie’s origins came just months after the attacks, Stoff said, when Richard Abate, book agent with Stoff’s 3 Arts Entertainment, was put in touch with Kris “Tanto” Paronto, one of the security contractors. “We got all five [contractors] together and we all realized there was a book there and eventually a movie,” Stoff said.

After a bidding war between a number of publishers, a Hachette imprint got the book, and Mitchell Zuckoff was hired to write it with the security team.

Other Benghazi film projects began to surface, so instead of waiting until the book was published, they began to develop and pitch the movie beforehand. Four of the contractors came with them to pitch the studios.

“They, as much as anybody, told the story,” Stoff said.

Paramount bought it, with Chuck Hogan writing the script and Bay attached by August, 2014, Stoff said. Other studios said it “was one of the most compelling pitches they had heard but everybody was reluctant about the politics of it.”

The book, “13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened in Benghazi,” was published that September.

“The biggest challenge was getting it right,” Zuckoff said.”I felt very deeply that so much false information had flown around this that if this book had even a small error we would be doing a disservice to them and to their service.”

Production started in April, 2015, including nine weeks in Malta and one week in Morocco.

Perhaps no other moment in the movie has been as hotly debated as the contractors’ assertion that they were given an order to “stand down” by the CIA annex chief, a wait of about 20 minutes before responding to the attack at the nearby diplomatic mission where Stevens was quartered. Eventually they bucked orders and left.

The contractors insist that a “stand down” order was given, even though the CIA has denied it and congressional investigations have so far found that none such order was given, even if there was a delay as the CIA chief sought out a local militia. (The chief’s identity is not revealed in the movie, and he is named “Bob”). Another report is expected this spring from a House special committee on Benghazi, and the issue is expected to be raised again, according to Politico. 

The issue is important because some of the contractors believe that if they had gotten their sooner they could have saved Stevens and Sean Smith, an information management officer who was killed.

The contractors “heard the calls immediately,” Zuckoff said. “No one has disputed that they ‘jocked up’ — in their lingo, they armored up immediately and they staged these cars ready to go. And then 20 minutes go by. There’s no question that Bob was trying to get help from the local militia forces. And so the delay did take place and the guys ultimately went on their own.”

Zuckoff said that he believes what the CIA chief was doing was “sincerely trying to gather forces, but it was a misguided effort.” The problem, he said, was that the militia was unreliable.

“We have never heard anything from the CIA other than, ‘No [the stand-down order] didn’t happen.’ These guys [the security contractors] are putting their lives and their reputations on the line saying, ‘We were forced to wait, and the record shows it.'” A problem, he said, was that the CIA chief was a spy, not a military tactical commander.

The book and the movie do not suggest what some conservative critics have — that the “stand down” order came from higher ranks, perhaps from the White House.

“We are not claiming that there was some order from on high, that there was some kind of overarching order out of Washington or even out of Tripoli,” Zuckoff said. “The book makes clear and the movie absolutely does, it absolutely gets it right, that these are fast-paced decisions, and they turned out to be wrong decisions.”

The movie also portrays Stevens’ belief in the U.S. engagement in Libya and assistance in transforming itself from a dictatorship, but at the same time some of the cynicism of one of the contractors.

“They had all been in this region for a decade, and had seen it become more violent and less democratic,” Zuckoff said. “And so whether it was cynicism or exhaustion — it definitely had set in. Having said that, they also had great respect for Chris Stevens. We all should respect Chris Stevens, who dedicated his life to trying to improve relations between the Arab world and the western world.”

As much as has been written and investigated about Benghazi, Zuckoff says that part of the story still remains a big mystery — the identities of all of the insurgents who attacked the compound and shelled the CIA annex that evening. Ahmed Abu Khattala, a leader of Ansar al-Sharia, was caught and is suspected of being one of the ringleaders of the attack.

“We need to get at the source of this,” Zuckoff said. “We need to find out about all of them. We need to understand exactly their motivations, with the idea of preventing it” from happening again.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 8

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Lisa Wallace says:

    This was an awful tragedy that shows the ball being dropped at several points. However, to act as if this is the first time people have died due to incompetent politicians and government agencies is to deny the deaths brought on by 13 separate attacks during the Bush administration where over 80 people were killed, and that is not including the fatal attacks on the Iraq Embassy. No, all of that number were not Americans, but they were innocent people of different nationalities who died while the Bush/Cheney administration sat on their arses. The contractors involved have stated over and over that they were tired of this tragedy being politicized which is why they told their story. The problem with our government, of both parties, is that they do not learn from their mistakes, but continue to repeat them.

  2. Greggreen29 says:

    In order for there to be a stand down order there has to first be a saddle up order. And apparently throughout the chain of command the saddle up order never appeared, despite American forces in many countries near the Med, as well as forces literally in the Med.

  3. Heartland Patriot says:

    Where the blame falls on the heads of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama on on bigger issues than the “stand down order”. Hillary failed to provide proper security for the State Department folks working there. Barack Obama failed to send military forces in the region who were ready and able to respond. The contractors and the other American personnel were left to die. It was only through the massive exertions, high skill, and incredible bravery of the contractors that any American made it out of there alive. Neither Hillary nor Obama wanted an incident before the election, and the whole thing about the protests over an “offensive video” were intended to deflect. Well, they can pat themselves on the back for that one, it worked and BHO is still in office…but he and Hillary both look horrible that they didn’t do more to support the Ambassador and the other personnel at that station.

  4. Jay Newcomer says:

    Maybe they can investigate the 13 embassies attacked under George W. Bush and the 61 people killed.

    • TessaTM says:

      9 Diplomatic personnel were killed under the Bush administration

      6 were from was attacks in Iraq/Afghanistan
      1 died in a plane crash in Nepal
      2 were assassinated – 1 in the Sudan, 1 in Pakistan
      No Ambassador was involved

    • You just cannot talk about this, can you? You have to deflect don’t you? Are you just an Obama/Hillary partisan, or were you told to post that? Either way, the FACTS about Benghazi remain…and a LOT of Americans are going to know about it, too.

  5. Saw it today and though I am not into lots of action and war/combat, I think the film did a good job in at least tacitly pointing to the US government’s failure in responding promptly and responsibly to the distress call. The main thing that I didn’t like about the movie was keeping it a mystery/guesswork as to why was that compound actually been hired and that diplomatic team sent there. “lethal weapons spreading to global market”? I don’t think that claim holds water.

    • Charles H says:

      “lethal weapons spreading to global market”

      Libya’s government possessed mustard agent munitions under Muammar al-Qaddafi’s leadership. After his fall from power, the chemical weapons could have easily fallen into terrorist hands. The CIA was there trying to acquire all of the missing munitions before they ended up on the black market.

      As an example, we failed in Syria and ISIS got a hold of Sarin nerve agent and used it on the Syrian rebels.

More Film News from Variety