Umberto Eco, ‘The Name of the Rose’ Author, Dies at 84

Umberto Eco, 'The Name of the
Photo by Serena Campanini/REX/Shutterstock

ROME — Italian academic and author Umberto Eco, who became a global pop culture superstar with his first novel, the medieval murder mystery “The Name of the Rose,” adapted into a movie starring Sean Connery and Christian Slater, died Saturday at his home in Milan. He was 84.

The cause of death has not been disclosed.

Eco was a scholar of semiotics, the study of signs and symbols and their social and cultural significance. It can be applied to words and images, therefore all types of icons — from religious ones to advertising, to traffic signs — and also clothes, music, film, comic books. This gave him a particular sensitivity that allowed him to infuse scholarly and popular cultures and became the trademark of his success.

“Mickey Mouse can be perfect in the [same] sense that a Japanese haiku is,” Eco told the Guardian in a 2002 interview.

Born Jan. 5, 1932, in the city of Alessandria, in Italy’s northwest, Eco emerged as a star student and young writer during Fascism. Then, after World War II, he joined a Catholic youth organization and became its national leader, before veering more to the left and resigning in protest against the conservatism of Pope Pius XII. He studied medieval philosophy and literature at the University of Turin, where he lectured from 1956 to 1964, and went on to teach philosophy and semiotics at the University of Bologna, Europe’s oldest university.

Eco also worked at Italian state broadcaster RAI and became a columnist, writing about pop culture and politics in L’Espresso, Italy’s top weekly magazine. He published nonfiction books, most notably a brief essay titled “Fenomenologia di Mike Bongiorno,” analysing the success of Italy’s most popular TV host.

In 1980 Eco made the transition to fiction with “The Name of the Rose,” set in a 14th century northern Italian monastery where monks are being mysteriously murdered. A Franciscan monk, played by Sean Connery in the movie, is sent to investigate the killings which turn out to be tied to heresy and a treatise by Aristotle which the murderers believe is an instrument of Satan.

The more than 500-page-long book, which devotes entire chapters to the intricacies of Christian theology, sold north of 10 million copies in some 30 languages. The 1986 movie by Jean-Jacques Annaud instead drew mixed responses. It was a critical and box office flop in the U.S. but was received warmly in Europe where it performed well and became a cult title. Variety called it “a sorrowfully mediocre screen version of Umberto Eco’s surprise international bestselling novel.”  It also spawned a board and a video game.

No other movie adaptations were made of Eco’s subsequent six novels, even though most of them sold widely, while never equalling “Rose” sales. They include “Foucault’s Pendulum,” considered the prototype to Dan Brown’s “The Da Vinci Code,” “Baudolino,” which mixes history and fantasy and is set during the 12th century sack of Constantinople, and his 2015 final novel  “Numero Zero,” a satire on contemporary Italian tabloid media considered to have an anti-Berlusconi sub-text. Eco was a staunch Silvio Berlusconi critic.

Eco is survived by his German wife Renate Ramage and their two children, Stefano, a television producer, and Carlotta, an architect.

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 2

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Marlette says:

    The Rose was one of the best books, and one of the most enjoyable movies, I have yet read/seen. Perhaps more so, because I am a librarian, and love old books. The library I worked in for many years, had many beautiful illuminated manuscripts, which were always a source of inspiration to me. The actors were perfect for their parts, the atmosphere., the story … everything was just great – one felt that one was there … If a movie is meant to entertain its viewers, this one succeeded with me. A medieval whodunit is not everyone’s cup of tea, but it is mine. In my opinion, the film captured the salient moments of the book perfectly, and it is obvious to anyone with half a brain cell, that no film can, in a couple of hours, capture the complexities of such a work as the Rose.
    It is a pity that people can’t just enjoy a film for what it is. Well done, to the late author and to the producer, for each producing a masterpiece.

  2. Peter says:

    Dear Variety, you are wrong about the movie “The Name of the Rose” by J.-J. Annaud. Even if your American reviewer thought it wasn’t good, was it really a “misfire” ? Commercially speaking it was a huge hit in Europe, where it made more than 100 mil. dollars. In Germany alone more than 6 mill. people saw it in theaters and it became one of the most beloved TV classics there. And it’s very well regarded by critics. Only in the US it didn’t do great business, but nobody expected that, because of the subject. Today there’s no question that it is one of Annaud’s best films with Sean Connery and F. Murray Abraham in some of their best roles. The cast & crew of the film are astonishing: Academy Award winners did the production design (Dante Ferretti), costume design (Gabriella Pescucci) and the music (James Horner). Umberto Eco himself liked many things about the film, he wrote in an essay about the reception of the novel, but saw it as a different medium that showed only part of his complex story. The film has today near-classic status in some European countries, so how can it be a “misfire” ?

More Film News from Variety