Film Review: ‘Hermia & Helena’

Hermia and Helena Movie Review
Courtesy of Locarno Film Festival

The longest of Matias Piñeiro's offbeat contemporary riffs on Shakespearean comedy is a little too airy to fill the time.

There’s a reason why petits fours are a patisserie staple, and grands fours are not: what’s puffily perfect at bite size can turn cloying in a larger slice. So it proves, in a sense, with “Hermia & Helena,” in which Argentinian writer-director Matias Piñeiro repeats the recipe behind his previous, scarcely feature-length Shakespearean cupcakes (all loosely drawn from the Bard’s comedies), only for the winsomeness to spread itself a little thin across 90 minutes. Riffing very liberally on “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” — directly invoked here as a text to be translated into Spanish — this tale of a Buenos Aires theater director finding her feet and potentially losing her heart in New York City lopes along with the same idle, chatty charm as Piñeiro’s hour-long “Viola” and “The Princess of France.” But with its tricksy timeline and waifish subplots, the film feels unduly stretched even to reach its modest length, while our dramaturgy-fixated protagonist is slow to stumble into a compelling arc of her own.

Despite their petite form, the Argentina-set, Spanish-lingo “Viola” and “The Princess of France” were both distributed theatrically in the U.S. by The Cinema Guild, so “Hermia & Helena” — bolstered by its predominantly American setting and English dialogue — should follow suit without a hitch. There’s a personal motivation behind the switch in milieu: Setting aside the Shakespearean reference points, Piñeiro was inspired by his own expat experience in the Big Apple, where, like his protagonist, he traveled on an arts fellowship. As the film switches from rapid-fire Spanish in its Buenos Aires interludes to its more tacit, contemplative New York scenes, it succumbs to the faintly airless tone that can come to non-native filmmakers working in English for the first time. That said, a certain degree of lost-in-translation frustration is key to its wandering narrative.

Much of the teasing, poker-faced game-playing in “Hermia and Helena” — the title refers to the young women of “A Midsummer Night’s Dream,” though they have no namesakes on screen — hinges on the doubling and substitution of personalities. Sensitive, ingenuous Camila (played by Piñeiro regular Agustina Muñoz) arrives in New York to take the place of her friend Carmen (Maria Villar) in a creative residency program, as well in a bijou rental apartment. It’s not long before she also seems to inherit a number of Carmen’s relationships, including a romance with amiable American hipster Lukas (recent indie fixture Keith Poulson), a conflicting dalliance with twee filmmaker Gregg (Dustin Guy Defa) and, most ambiguously, an elusive, alluring postcard correspondence with traveling Frenchwoman and former program fellow Danielle (Mati Diop, lending proceedings some Euro-arthouse credentials).

And so this merry-go-round of overlapping identities spins on, complicated by a staggered, one-step-forward-two-steps-back flashback structure — sometimes to the point of needless opacity. Occasionally, we hop back to Camila’s former, more sun-kissed life in Argentina; other off-piste distractions are more tenuous, as when we dip into Gregg’s Daphne du Maurier-inspired experimental short, built from an existing vintage work. It’s a light-footed feat of geometric storytelling, evoking the Shakespeare play that so fascinates Camila more in its general spirit of wistful-whimsical chaos than in specific narrative terms. But beneath the ornate, fidgety arrangement of it all, neither film nor protagonist seem to have much sense of what they’re about, until a more sustained late-film passage sees Camila delving melancholically into her complex family history. To us and her alike, then, the personal fancies and flirtations that have hitherto consumed the bulk of the film are made to seem rather immaterial.

Like Camila, Piñeiro is unafraid to wear his influences (beyond just the Bard) blithely on his sleeve. An opening credit dedicates the film to Japanese actress Setsuko Hara, renowned for her collaborations with Yasujiro Ozu: There’s a certain zen contentment to the Argentine’s filmmaking that nods to the Japanese humanist master’s work, albeit with considerable more fussiness in the telling. (There’s a sweet, guileless placidity to Muñoz’s performance, too, though her surrounding ensemble is less consistent.) Cuttings from Jacques Rivette and Hong Sang-soo also appear to be on the directorial mood board here, while there’s a jaunty, neurotic streak of Woody Allen in the heavy presence of Scott Joplin on the soundtrack. If “Hermia & Helena” finally seems short on complete ideas, its assorted allusions provide compensatory frosting.

Film Review: 'Hermia & Helena'

Reviewed at Locarno Film Festival (competing), Aug. 5, 2016. (Also in Toronto Film Festival — Wavelengths.) Running time: 86 MIN.

Production

(Argentina-U.S.) A Trapecio Cine, Ravenser Odd production in co-production with Cinema Conservancy. (International sales: Trapecio Cine, Buenos Aires.) Produced by Graham Swon, Melanie Schapiro, Andrew Adair, Jake Perlin.

Crew

Directed, written by Matias Piñeiro. Camera (color), Fernando Lockett; editor, Sebastián Schjaer.

With

Agustina Muñoz, Maria Villar, Dan Sallitt, Mati Diop, Julian Larquier, Keith Poulson, Dustin Guy Defa, Pablo Sigal, Kyle Molzan, Ryan Miyake, Oscar Williams. (English, Spanish dialogue)

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 2

Leave a Reply

2 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Benjy Compson says:

    Holy Hell. I just saw this film last night. At first I was going to praise the director for his ambitious decision to cast androids in every single role, but then I came to and realized that I had just watched the flattest, most emotionally antiseptic, charisma-free inconsequentiality ever committed to screen. The dialog is bare and boring, delivered in a near monotone by a cast that is interchangeable by way of their characters’ equal absence of personality. When the “story” took a few turns for the potentially dramatic, I felt like I was watching The Asperger’s Players Presents. This film makes the most muted mumblecore flick feel like Who’s Afraid Of Virgina Wolf.

    See!!! People waiting to get buzzed into walk up apartments! See!!! The protagonist banally flit between neutered boyfriends! See!!! Someone pay for Spanish lessons in cash!

    As someone who is tired of bloated, Hollywood action sequels and mediocre Oscar bait, I make an attempt to support indie and foreign cinema. But, come on! I fail to understand why some of these poorer “alternative” films are getting a pass by critics and some audience members. Perhaps by acknowledging that there are some real duds in the genre, they might be admitting to the cold fact that the whole of contemporary cinema may be headed into the shitter.

    Just because you have a tiny budget, doesn’t mean you have to make a tiny film.

  2. Dana of fakenewspapersdotcom says:

    This movie looks interesting and I can’t wait to see the twists and turns on this one!

More Film News from Variety

Loading