Sean Penn Unmasks ‘The End’ of the Acting Blues (Guest Column)

Sean Penn Acting Blues Variety Guest
AP Photo/Michel Euler

From 500 B.C. to 300 B.C., actors of the Greek theatre wore the masks of comedy and tragedy–those that had come to be the representative symbols of the craft of acting, and the expression of the actor. Somewhere along the line, acting found its way more into a profession than expression. Today, those masks represent a union, or more accurately, a guild of actors that work to protect business with little or no focus on the protection of creative expression.

Throughout my own career as an actor, I’ve worked hard to avoid that label; to find projects that I felt I could serve well in their expression. I tried to avoid careerism.  I have had my share of transgressions. Yet overall, my care for the work was such that I sought a body of work that would, within my own limitations, express my generation’s experience.

Now, in my mid-fifties, thirty five plus years into that career, I have found myself often, slumping into a depression over my own observation of the disparity between those Greek expressions of comedy and tragedy, and a generation of actors today, who so ubiquitously find expression itself passé, and seem to make movies simply for the purpose of selling them and less so the making of them. I felt surrounded, and it led to several bouts of depression.

Depression led me to a writer named David Foster Wallace. I began with a brilliant biography of Wallace, written by a New Yorker writer, D.T. Max. In his book on Wallace, he quotes him saying “…you are sickness yourself…you realize all this, here. And that, I guess, is…when you look at the black hole and it’s wearing your face.”

I dove in to Wallace’s writing; his “Infinite Jest,” his “A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again” (acting?).  And from his writing, I went to YouTube and watched his television interviews, most significantly, with Charlie Rose. David Foster Wallace was already dead. Committed suicide at the age of forty-six. This man, who was suddenly making me feel less alone, a man of poetic idiosyncrasy, and extraordinary honesty about himself and the human condition, this  man, who I’d felt such a kinship with was already dead and buried.

No, no, no!! No, no, no!! I wasn’t ready to let him go. So, BOOM, I know what I’ll do. I’ll make a movie about him. That will certainly keep him alive. But there was a problem. Who on earth could play him? Who was the actor less invested in advertising, or in the politeness of profession than in actually suiting up and getting inside of Wallace? Who had the range, the physical and mental structure to play David Foster Wallace? The answer came quickly:  There wasn’t one.

I put up my white flag and marched forward. Perhaps it was enough, just knowing his voice had been heard. A few years passed, and I boarded a plane to the Middle East. En route, I went through the airline film selections, “Don’t wanna see that.” “Don’t wanna see that.” “Don’t wanna see that.” “Don’t wanna see that.” Then the title “End of the Tour” came up, if only because it was the first among the titles I’d passed on that I’d never heard of before. I read the brief summary. “Jesus Christ, they made a movie about David Foster Wallace.” And there it was. Jason Segel as David Foster Wallace.

I had enjoyed Jason Segel in a host of comedies my kids had forced me to watch. I knew he was talented. I knew there was no more challenging form than comedy. BUT AS DAVID FOSTER WALLACE?! Do I want to see this!? Or is this going to drive me into the current location of Mister Wallace himself? I decided there was no better place to be brave than in a six thousand ton machine, twenty five thousand feet above the ocean, entirely out of my own control.  So I gave it a go.

I pressed “play.” I sat for 106 minutes. For maybe ten of those minutes, was I not weeping. It wasn’t just a wonderful film. It wasn’t just the writer’s intelligent selection from Foster Wallace’s public works to the creation of dialogue and behavior that so well had matched my own experience of Wallace. It wasn’t just the assured direction, or the generous performance of his co-lead. What it was, most significantly, was the realization that I was seeing a real actor, a real person, in Jason Segel. From a generation so dominated by human advertisements, calling themselves human actors. I was seeing in Jason Segel not the selling of a film, but the making of one–the pure, intelligent, sad, funny, human embodiment of the origin of those Greek masks.

Something about this experience flooded my brain with dopamine. It just made me happy. And it still does. There’s an actor out there, I thought. Good.

Sean Penn, who is critically acclaimed for his dramatic turns in films such as “Dead Man Walking,” “I Am Sam,” “Milk” and “Into the Wild,” is also known for his political and social activism, including his humanitarian work in the aftermath of the earthquake in Haiti.

 

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 12

Leave a Reply

12 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Jay Essman says:

    I saw Penn on stage once, in Hurlyburly, and he was really good. If the state of movies depresses him, he should go back to the theater. But it would cost him some money. The movie studios are more interested in selling their movies than making them, but it seems to me Penn is more interested in selling his acting talent than using it. Sean Penn could do, say, A View From the Bridge, or Night of the Iguana, or The Iceman Cometh–that would be serious art. Does he have any interest in putting his money where his mouth is?

  2. donh says:

    Who had the range, the physical and mental structure to play David Foster Wallace? The answer came quickly: There wasn’t one.

    really? no one? that’s simply wrong.

  3. Mark Coffey says:

    Thanks for this. Those of us who struggle with coping with life (and don’t we all?) and were touched by the humanity of DFW are legion. If there was a common thread throughout Wallace’s work it was the difficulty of human connection in our current world, but the absolute necessity of it nonetheless. As for the film itself, it was poignant, wistful, and thoughtful, but not hagiographical. Wallace was not put on a pedestal…he was shown as the very flawed, very lonely, hyper-intelligent, observant soul that he by all accounts was. Penn’s thoughts here are right on point, as is his praise of the performance of the lead.

  4. anthony says:

    Penn’s disturbing disdain for: “not the selling of a film”, “a guild of actors that work to protect business”, “I tried to avoid careerism.” Is hypocritical! The film business is called show business because it’s a business!! No one would know, or care who Sean Penn is if some investors, corporate or independent financier had not finance his movies. Penn has notoriety, money and fame because someone else financed his movies. Why doesn’t Penn finance his movies and NOT charge anyone to see his films without caring or concern for the return of his investment?? or even better, not get paid for his acting, directing or producing. People have short memories!! Do some research on Penn’s hate for America because of what and how he still believes America hurt his father. If his father was unjustly mistreated, so were others and forgiveness is cleansing for the soul. All he needs is more forgiveness. Check out: “Trumbo” (Bryan Cranston! Enough said)”

    • Simon says:

      @Anthony Penn has financed his movies before, The Indian Runner. You missed point entirely. You can be an actor and not be a commodity. They’re supposed to sell the movie,not themselves. That was the point Penn was making. Evidently that went over your head.

  5. TM says:

    I had the very identical experience – watched this film on a plane – alas further back – and was so deeply immersed and touched by the humanity portrayed, I wept. Jesse Eisenberg is mostly content being the bystander, except when his character itself is not content with that role. Had no idea who Jason Seagal was – but now can say he is a genius.

  6. Mark says:

    Have you quit smoking cigarettes yet, sean?

  7. Anonymous says:

    I liked this film too. Jesse Eisenberg is great as the Rolling Stone reporter. The director, James Ponsoldt also did another film “The Spectacular Now” with (with pre-“Whiplash”) Miles Teller and Shailene Woodley that is fantastic. Check it out. Other “under the radar” films this year to see (the smaller or mid-range films, not having quite the same marketing push that the big comic book ones do are): “Love & Mercy” (Paul Dano, Elizabeth Banks & Paul Giamatti are great), “99 Homes” (Michael Shannon rocks the bad guy here, and Andrew Garfield is great), “Truth” (Sooo much better than “Spotlight” – Robert Redford nails his Dan Rather and Cate Blanchett!), “Suffragette” (Sarah Gavron does an excellent job directing with an amazing performance by Carey Mulligan), “Woman in Gold” (Helen Mirren should get 2 Oscar noms for this and “Trumbo”), “Trumbo” (Bryan Cranston! Enough said), “The Hateful 8” (You can’t miss this for its daring, cinematography and score, not to mention just for Samuel Jackson’s/Tarantino’s dialogue. Jennifer Jason Leigh is great and should also get a double nom for this and Charlie Kaufman’s film “Anamolisa” — also not to be missed). Also liked “Joy” (J-Law can’t do a bad turn), and for the big films “Everest” was pretty good, but for some reason isn’t getting an Oscar push (in spite of its epic nature — great cinematography, editing and direction).

  8. Spider says:

    Very poignant article and a great read. Thanks, Sean!

  9. Henry Deas says:

    One of the most powerful, honest and open guest articles we have ever ha. probably the most

More Film News from Variety

Loading