‘La La Land’ Could Be the Year’s Most Radical Box Office Hit

'La La Land' Breaks Records Thanks
Courtesy of Lionsgate

When it comes to movie musicals, there’s a reason Hollywood doesn’t make them like they used to.

La La Land,” a throwback to a time when bursting out in song was a familiar sight on the big screen, is beating the odds and seems poised to play to big audiences. If it succeeds, it will be one of the most radical movie hits of the aughts.

The Lionsgate production, one of the only original musicals produced by a major studio in the last two or three decades, is breaking records in limited release. This weekend it earned $855,000 from five theaters in New York and Los Angeles. The film’s per-location average of $171,000 is the second best ever for a specialty film. “La La Land” will expand to 200 theaters next weekend and should be in most major markets by Christmas.

Related

Damien Chazelle la la land BTS

‘La La Land’ Director’s Ex-Wife Gets Last-Minute Executive Producer Credit (EXCLUSIVE)

“This opening sets this movie on the right path,” said Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at comScore. “It looks like it’s going to have a perfect storm of box office success and critical acclaim.”

The film hits at a time of bruised feelings. Public opinion polling shows historically low approval for President-elect Donald Trump, with post-election evaluations among the most negative of any White House race dating back to 1988. In this atmosphere of post-election malaise, “La La Land,” an ebullient, big-hearted romance, seems like an antidote. It’s a valentine to the musicals of Vincente Minnelli and Jacques Demy, with a warmth and optimism that could sweep away any lingering bad feelings after a bruising campaign.

“It’s a movie that you walk in the theater and you just feel great,” said David Spitz, Lionsgate’s head of distribution. “It makes you feel terrific and that’s a good thing right now.”

“La La Land” is a mainstay of many critic’s year-end best lists and it’s been earning raves since playing film festivals like Toronto and Telluride last fall. No less a fan than Tom Hanks took a break from hawking his film “Sully” to say that “if the audience doesn’t go and embrace something as wonderful as [‘La La Land’] then we are all doomed.”

“La La Land” seems destined to rack up impressive grosses, but it was always a dicey proposition. The singing and dancing genre used to be a staple of the movie business. It made the careers of Fred Astaire, Gene Kelly, Ginger Rogers, and Judy Garland. Ever since the Woodstock era, however, musicals have faced an uncertain box office reception.

There have been a few films that have found popular approval, among them “Grease” and “Fiddler on the Roof,” but it’s an intimate group of success stories. More recent releases such as “Les Miserables” and “Chicago” have scored with audiences, but they’ve been helped in part by Oscar love. They had another point working on their behalf: those movies were adapted from widely known stage shows.

The track record of other movie musicals is a mixed bag. “Moulin Rouge!” was moderately successful despite lacking Broadway pedigree, but it boasted a jukebox soundtrack of music from Elton John, Madonna, the Police, and other pop singers. Other original musicals, such as James L. Brooks’ “I’ll Do Anything” or the Cher and Christina Aguilera dance-off, “Burlesque,” were not so fortunate, and bombed badly.

“There’s a reason why a lot of studios didn’t bite on this,” said Jeff Bock, an analyst with Exhibitor Relations. “They took a risk and it looks like it’s going to pay off.”

For Lionsgate, “La La Land” presented a great opportunity to work with Damien Chazelle, the wunderkind behind “Whiplash.” The studio’s motion picture group president Erik Feig met the director at Sundance, where “Whiplash” had just premiered, and began thinking of ways they could collaborate. Chazelle had been toying with the idea of making a movie like “La La Land” since college. He hoped to put a modern spin on classic musicals such as “The Band Wagon” and “The Umbrellas of Cherbourg.”

“We believed in him and his vision as a filmmaker,” said Spitz.

Still “La La Land” was a leap of faith. Its soundtrack is comprised entirely of new music. The picture’s melancholy ballads such as “City of Stars” and up-tempo numbers like “Someone in the Crowd” are the work of composer Justin Hurwitz and lyricists Benj Pasek and Justin Paul.  They aren’t widely known songwriters, and “La La Land” had no top-40 hits or hit makers to fall back on.

Despite that, Spitz believes the film is benefiting from great reviews and some old-school movie star glamor. Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone have previously partnered on “Crazy Stupid Love” and “Gangster Squad,” and they have the kind of chemistry that’s hard to capture on film. They also are helping the film play to a broader audience than moviegoers reared on the work of Fred and Ginger. In limited release, “La La Land” drew crowds of younger women and men,” the Lionsgate executive said.

“This movie is playing literally to everyone,” said Spitz. “It’s just a matter of people discovering the movie. It’s going to play and play.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 11

Leave a Reply

11 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Michelle A says:

    aughts are over… ????

  2. Gordon Farrell says:

    This is not “the aughts.” That’s the first decade of the century. This decade is usually referred to as the twenty-tens.

  3. gavin says:

    I’ll Do Anything was never released as a musical.

  4. Daniel Krog says:

    In this movie, Damien Chazelle goes out of his way to depict a Los Angeles that is fillied with real and beautiful diversity… this is such a good thing. The only people that are missing from Mr. Chazelle’s diverse vision of Hollywood is GAY PEOPLE! I left the theater insensed. I have lived and worked in Los Angeles my whole life. NEVER have I been to a Hollywood party that is LGBT-free. Never have I experienced the hetero-sexist, straight-centric entertainment industry depicted in this film. But this is the Hollywood Mr. Chazelle wants us to accept. And it is disgusting. Without the gay community Hollywood would not exist as we know it. It was built on the backs of gay men and women. To see this seemingly obvious ommition of gay people in a movie that is clearly a ‘love letter to Hollywood’ is beyond offensive. Obviously Mr. Chazelle does not see the gay community as part of a diverse vision of Hollywood, or anywhere else. This is homophobia in its most cunning form. Los Angeles is my home town. And the entertainment industry is generally loving and inclusive of the LGBT community. Mr. Chazelle shoud go back to Rhode Island. He clearly does not respect or embrace the LGBT community here, and he does not belong in a city or industry that embraces the LGBT community. Maybe he could find success in Iran or Russia. His values seem to be more in line with those sorts of places. Sincerely, Daniel Krog

    • Kevin says:

      There are two men dancing together in the Paris sequence. But blink and you miss them.

    • Ronnie says:

      Daniel, not every movie about LA and every movie musical has to be about the gay community. This movie main story is about a boy and a girl and their Hollywood dreams. As a gay man, I appreciated that no gay character was just thrown in just to have one in the story as decoration or have a meaningless B-storyline. The film should be enjoyed for what it is and nothing more.

      • Daniel Krog says:

        Thanks for your comment Ronnie. I would like to respond…
        I never said that ‘La La Land’ should be ABOUT the gay community. I knew that it wasn’t when I went. I am not a fanatic that needs all things to be about gay people. I will reiterate my point. Mr Chazelle clearly made an effort to create a diverse vision of LA and the industry that is ‘Hollywood’. He did a beautiful, necessary job of that with many large and small examples of that diversity. But for him to leave gay people OUT of that diverse vision completely, especially in a movie that is about an industry where gays are such an important part was beyond offensive. I am sure Mr Chazelle did not just forget. It was so glaring that it seemed intentional on his part. And that is disgusting. This comes after ‘Whiplash’. That film had many people questioning the homophobic tones present in the script. Mr Chazelle addressed those concerns to a lukewarm effect. And now this. At this point I have very good reason to question his feelings and attitudes about gay people.
        Thanks again…
        Sincerely, Daniel.

  5. Steve Barr says:

    People should check out The Cotton Club and One FromThe Heart two under appreciated musicals from Francis Coppola..

  6. Kenny says:

    This movie and this article has nothing to do with Donald Trump…but let’s just use it to trash him anyway. The heck?

  7. Michael Blampain says:

    I would consider most Disney animated films released over the past 2 decades to be musicals….Beauty and The Beast, Little Mermaid, Princess and the Frog, Frozen…….these were all very successful. And did we really need the political nonsense in this article? What does the success of this movie have to do with President Elect Trump? It can never be that that people just want to see a film because it is good and the music is catchy? Please leave the political stuff out….

  8. paulg says:

    Saw it at Whistle Film Fest. It is rapturous.

More Film News from Variety

Loading