Paramount Needs to Fatten Up Skimpy Film Slate

Brad Grey Paramount
Eddie Guy for Variety

A decade ago I wrote a column about Brad Grey just as he had assumed his new role as chief of Paramount. I issued dire warnings about the challenges he would inevitably face making the transition from the town’s top talent manager to studio chief. Re-invention in mid-career certainly did not work out well for David Begelman, a fabulously successful agent whose stint as Columbia’s CEO almost landed him in jail. Michael Ovitz brilliantly ran CAA but promptly self-immolated at Disney as did producer David Puttnam at Columbia and agent John Lesher at Paramount.

Grey seemed destined for a similar fate at Paramount. In his first months at his new gig, the press pounded him relentlessly: His appointments were deemed inept (TV executive Gail Berman was hired and fired as head of movie production). Stories about his litigation with former client Garry Shandling hinted at dark dealings with phone-hacker Anthony Pellicano. Then came the headline-making blowup with DreamWorks, with David Geffen and Steven Spielberg marching their troops off the lot. Then Grey’s boss, Sumner Redstone, abruptly fired Tom Cruise over his greedy demands and weird off-screen behavior.

Now, 10 years later, Grey has defied predictions that his personal mid-career transition would be as disastrous as those of his predecessors. He seems very much in control at Paramount and the press has stopped beating up on him.

But it has become very clear that Grey now faces a new job of re-invention — this time of his studio. Paramount’s movie slate has become so thin that the studio has all but disappeared (its first major release will be mid-summer). Though the studio’s press releases have stressed profitability, yearly profits have declined three years in a row, down 12% last year alone. Meanwhile, Paramount’s parent company, Viacom, is imposing major layoffs under pressure from ratings declines at its cable networks. According to analyst Roger Smith, Viacom’s studio revenues have fallen every year save one since 2008 from $6 billion to $3.7 billion (there were disastrous tumbles in homevideo revenues in that period). CBS, under Les Moonves, has remained a bright spot in Redstone’s corporate universe.

Grey is sending signals that he intends to spark a resurgence at Paramount. Dismissing his production chief, Adam Goodman, he is trusting Goodman’s deputy, Marc Evans, to increase the annual film slate from six to between 12 and 14 films a year. The search is on for new franchises to bolster the aging “Star Trek” and “Transformers,” and Grey himself is focused on bolstering the animation pipeline and resusitating Paramount’s television initiatives.

In tackling all this, Grey has a credibility problem to overcome. He has proclaimed ambitious plans in the past to bolster Paramount’s annual slate, and has named ambitious executives, with little follow-through. The job of production chief has become a revolving door.

Nonetheless, a prospective studio resurgence is all the more relevant now that Wall Street is floating various corporate scenarios that might unfold at the end of the Sumner Redstone era. Insiders believe that, contrary to speculation, Redstone’s long-entrenched personal consiglieris will ensure a smooth transition; still corporate rivalries exist within the empire and takeover specialists avidly eye Viacom’s vast landscape.

Those close to Grey testify that he exhibits no such tensions. Soft spoken and canny, Grey clearly has mastered the laws of corporate survival. As far as he’s concerned, the first 10 years mark only the beginning.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 9

Leave a Reply

9 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Mark says:

    Six movies a year, wow that is pathetic.

  2. a jay says:

    Klinton Spilsbury and Benedict Cumberbatch in a reboot of The Cisco Kid (and Pancho)….think of how much fun it will be to say their names together. But every time I come up with a weird satire, like a movie about Play-Doh or Hungry, Hungry Hippos — I FIND OUT THAT IT IS FOR REAL !

  3. Anonymous says:

    If they make Top Gun II: Going Clear, they’re finished.

  4. Tom Segerson says:

    Too bad that Hollywood only looks at pre-sold stories, as in comics, novels or franchises that have been milked dry. It’s the same old, same old, just repackaged for the dullards who’ll watch anything. They don’t take a chance on new works and therefore usually reap nothing. Which is why so many indies are making headway and major production is moving off-shore. Lots of great tech in LA, but not so much creativity.

  5. harry georgatos says:

    This studio should develop THE PERSUADERS, THE CHAMPIONS, THE PRISONER, NOWHERE MAN, THE INVADERS and the sic-fi novel THE DEMOLISHED MAN into event movies. The materials are out there and all it takes is the right packaging!

  6. cadavra says:

    The problem is that these jackasses don’t understand that this is a retail business. If there’s no product on the shelves, you don’t make any money. Why is this so difficult to comprehend?

  7. TheBigBangOf20thCenturyPopCulture says:

    Welcome to the new Hollywood Twilight Zone. Decision making at the top is futile when movieland creativity is at a low point. Green lighters will have to CGI actors who have charisma and find some musicians with talent for film scores. Remember all of the classic blockbusters of the 70s and 80s with rugged leading men and epic theme songs? What has happened to sound? Where are at we now?

  8. hasdibravo says:

    Just get The Last Airbender sequels/reboots going already. A franchise in the hand is better than two in the ….

More Voices News from Variety

Loading