TV Review: ‘StarTalk’

Star Talk TV Review National Geographic
Courtesy of National Geographic Channel

For an astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson is certainly having his media moment, and then some. Beyond being the go-to guy for space talk in venues like “The Daily Show,” he’s become the host of the revived “Cosmos,” and this week not only narrates a National Geographic Channel special about the Hubble telescope but adds a weekly talkshow, “StarTalk,” to his media menu. Yet the series, at least, represents a case of stretching the Tyson experience a dimension too far, as well as demonstrating the limits of transforming something as static as a radio show/podcast into television.

Tyson amiably hosts the festivities out of his perch as director of the Hayden Planetarium, promising a discussion “where science and pop culture collide.” Given the initial guest roster — “Star Trek’s” George Takei and director Christopher Nolan, fresh off the space-and-time-bending “Interstellar” — so far, so good.

Still, what emerges is a disjointed affair, one in which Tyson is joined in each episode by different co-hosts — one a comedian, the other a fellow scientist — a format that dices the central interview into snippets, then features extended interludes in which Tyson and his fellow studio mates expand upon and dissect the conversation.

Honestly, though, a free-wheeling chat with Takei (even conducted without frills on the couch in Tyson’s office) about a life through the filter of “Star Trek,” or with Nolan about the science undergirding his films, doesn’t require, or much benefit from, the postgame analysis. And when Tyson tells Nolan that “Interstellar” is “an orgy of relativity,” it would be more fun to hear them explore that further than talk for 60 seconds or so before retreating back to the planetarium.

Nor do the producers do much in terms of illustrating these discussions with graphics or clips — which would seem to be a natural conceit — presumably because the emphasis is on filling an hour in the cheapest manner possible. That includes handing a few minutes in each installment to Bill Nye the Science Guy to deliver a brief rant about some topic or another, loosely related to science fiction’s relationship to society; these prove slightly stilted, but at least exhibit a bit of ingenuity and flair.

It’s a shame, really, since the series has lined up an impressive roster of guests — including Jimmy Carter, Norman Lear, Arianna Huffington and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins — and where else is one going to encounter a talkshow that spends this much time waxing poetic about wormholes and black holes, or even the practical uses of a “Star Trek” transporter if we ever got around to building one. Given the popularity of the genre, there’s a great deal to be said for a program tackling where science and fiction actually meet — and where they diverge.

Tyson still seems like the right person to host that kind of show, but “StarTalk,” as constituted, isn’t it. So for now, the cosmic journey from popular podcast to satisfying TV show will have to wait for a different time and place, or maybe an alternate universe.

TV Review: 'StarTalk'

(Series; National Geographic Channel, Mon. April 20, 11 p.m.)


Produced by Curved Light Prods. and National Geographic Studios.


Executive producers, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Helen Matsos, Brian Lovett; co-executive producer, Drew Pulley. 60 MIN.


Host: Neil deGrasse Tyson

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Jim Roberts says:

    I’m science minded and have had a long career in science and I love shows about science. But I had to stop watching Startalk. It may have stars and there may be talk but all I hear is noise from the host. I’d think the guests would be embarrassed to be put in that position.

    Mr. Tyson has been entertaining and informative in other roles hosting visual, graphic, and demonstrative programs but he comes off clumsy, conceited and unsophisticated in this venue.

    I’m sorry but you guys lost me after the 2nd show and I tried hard to like it.

  2. site says:

    It’s amazing to pay a quick visit this website and reading the views of all colleagues concerning this paragraph, while I am also zealous of getting know-how.

  3. Ray says:

    how do you put graphics up that your not prepared for. This is not a scripted talk. If you listen to the pod cast you would know this is but one format. when Tyson talks about an interview in the live podcast. most are not that way. maybe we should give it a chance before you pass a judgment. I thought it did pretty good for the first show.

    • DeCrappy says:

      Tyson is a pompous ass. Much of what he states as “fact” is unproven theory, and everyone knows it.

      • Luke says:

        By the same logic Christianity is an unproven theory. The difference is that he wouldn’t kill people for his theories whereas you.would if it meant you go to heaven.

More TV News from Variety