CNN’s ‘The Seventies’ Looks Back at Seeds Of Media Revolution

The Seventies CNN Documentary Series Looks
CBS Photo Archive/Getty Images

The success of CNN’s “The Sixties” inevitably begat “The Seventies,” which kicks off June 11 with an hour devoted to the TV of the decade, subtitled “Television Gets Real.” Yet what at first blush looks like a demographic pander actually offers a rather timely reminder of how many of the seeds of the modern media revolution were planted during those years.

Indeed, if the ’60s birthed an antiwar movement and sexual revolution that live on in the culture wars and ongoing struggles involving gay marriage and women’s equality, the ’70s unleashed a wave of TV innovations that have mushroomed beyond anyone’s dreams.

Not surprisingly, the special devotes much of its time to the programming itself, to Norman Lear’s enormous impact on the culture with “All in the Family” and its various spinoffs, as well as the battle that ensued over the so-called family hour, a term that often remains misunderstood and abused to this day. There’s also some discussion of the birth of the miniseries – which has additional resonance, given the resurgence of the “limited series” format in its stead – with appropriate nods to “I, Claudius,” “Rich Man, Poor Man” and of course “Roots.”

Less flashy but equally important, however, were the business wrinkles that arose in those years, among them the development of cable TV and the birth of HBO and ESPN. There is, in fact, a hilarious clip of a “60 Minutes” piece in which Mike Wallace frets about the possible unintended consequences, basically, of letting the cable genie out of the bottle.

Another huge moment came with the introduction of “Monday Night Football,” which, with its success as a primetime showcase, paved the way not only for the explosive growth of the National Football League but the escalating rights deals and reliance on sports as a major engine of the TV ecosystem, with the excesses all that free-flowing cash has helped foster.

“Monday Night” also advanced the notion of sports as entertainment, with the sitcom-style pairing of Don Meredith and Howard Cosell. Don Ohlmeyer – who cut his teeth as a producer at ABC Sports – notes in the program that ABC in essence took devoted football fans for granted, setting their sights on marketing the game to everyone else, which helps explain many of the anything-but-the-game innovations on display today.

It took years for all these breakthroughs to mature into the forces they have become, with the value of ESPN alone eclipsing by a factor of nearly three the $19 billion that Disney agreed to pay to acquire the network as a part of Capital Cities/ABC in 1995. And while the cable distribution model that grew around those channels is currently besieged by new technology and alternatives, it’s frankly remarkable how durable it’s been amid the talk of cutting its chords and unwinding its bundles.

Like “The Sixties,” this Tom Hanks-produced series promises to be a sort-of once-over-lightly look at history, with Vietnam, Watergate and the Iran Hostage Crisis among the other chapters. Yet many of the nascent steps that began the march into TV’s future did happen during that decade as well. That might not be particularly easy to condense into a network promo, but for those interested in media, it’s a lot more significant, frankly, than run-of-the-mill nostalgia about “Happy Days” or “Charlie’s Angels.”

 

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. winslow wilson says:

    People of today should watch to get a glimpse of what real journalism was like before Rupert Murdoch, Fox News and the other conservative corporate conglomerates got their claws into owning the mainstream news media. The show gives a good idea of how open and honest our reporters were and how open minded and uncontrolled the truth was in those days.
    The series shows us how restricted our journalism is now a days. We mainly get sensational headlines that go no where into investigative reporting. Either that, or we are spoon fed pablum and corporate agenda as journalism.
    There was definitely no “Black out of stories in those days” If something was of importance it broke the news regardless of who wanted it to disappear. As an example in the Kent State Massacre. The whole protest at the school at that time was because of the ‘Secret War’ and bombing going on in Cambodia at that time.
    Reporters broke the news that our government was trying to keep from us since they didn’t want us to know that over a million of the Cambodians has died as a result of the mayhem we had taken to the region. The journalism of those days made us all talk with each other and question why we were entering another country’s civil war and why the most technologically advanced nation on earth was making war on peasants working in rice fields, living in bamboo huts 10,000 miles away.
    Our journalism was healthy and good for us at one time. Now a days, it’s just bland, trite and next to useless here in the US. Thanks Goodness for the web, where we can get to other countries reporters and learn about the real facts going on in the world.

  2. Jason says:

    I’ve watched both “The Sixties” and “The Seventies”, and I like them both, and I look forward to watching more as The Seventies continues. I was born in 1973, and i remember *some* things about the 70s, if not everything. Does Tom Hanks plan to do a docuseries on the 80s as well? I look forward to watching that as well.

  3. Alma Lopez says:

    There was no mention whatsoever on the first part of this program of PBS’ “An American Family”. It was a revolutionary 12-part documentary that changed tv in the ’70’s just as much(maybe even more) as programs like “All In The Family” or “Saturday Night Live” did. Why the snub? If it comes up later in the other segments, fine, but it really should have been mentioned in the premiere show. Am confused as to why Tom Hanks and the others in charge of this program felt they should throw in “Monty Python”, but not “An American Family”.

More TV News from Variety

Loading