L.A. Theater Review: ‘Waterfall’ with Thai Pop Star Bie Sukrit

Waterfall review Pasadena Playhouse
Jim Cox

“Waterfall,” the new cross-cultural, lushly romantic tuner at the Pasadena Playhouse, has admirable ambition, visual splendor and patchy dramaturgy. Working from a Thai source novel, stage veterans Richard Maltby Jr. (words) and David Shire (music) seek to explore cultural identity in personal and political contexts, set against a complex historical backdrop. Which is all too tall an order at this stage of the show’s development. Characterizations and plotlines will need to be firmed up if the next stop, Seattle’s 5th Avenue Theatre in October, is to be followed by a hoped-for Broadway success.

Set in the Far East in the simmering prewar 1930s, the story has a central triangle that’s straight out of Somerset Maugham: Older ambassador (Thom Sesma) brings young, flighty American wife (Emily Padgett) to his Tokyo posting, where sparks fly with an even younger Thai student (Bie Sukrit) possessing, in his words, “an American eye.” And a roving one.

While our main couple explore each other’s values — and eventually, bodies — a newly democratic Thailand aspires to a place on the world stage through ginger negotiation between two bombastic rising empires, Japan and the U.S. of A. (At times “Waterfall” plays like a de facto “The King and I” sequel, with Mrs. Anna and the young Prince envisioned in a modern Siam.)

Choosing to examine not two but three clashing cultures offers plenty potential conflict, as characters are interestingly pulled among Japanese pan-Asian militarism, American rah-rah capitalism and traditional Siamese serenity. Co-directors Tak Viravan and Dan Knechtges manage to avoid kitsch in evoking each of those elements, as do Knechtges’s dances, so respectful of the traditions from which they spring.

Every scene in “Waterfall” is a visual delight, with Ken Billington’s lighting limpidly bringing out the East’s shimmering palette in Sasavat Busayabandh’s scenic designs. Giant stone-like panels, sliding to reveal and conceal, are jaggedly diagonal to suggest a world threatened with imminent disharmony, even as Caite Hevner Kemp’s watercolor projections make that world seem so very appealing.

Shire’s score, his most versatile work for the musical stage, sets Asian-tinged melodies against robust percussion and jazz interruptions, all filtered through Jonathan Tunick’s cliche-free, period-evocative orchestrations.

But Maltby’s lyrics are light on the striking metaphors one associates with Eastern verse. And in a show already harping on personal identity, he takes too much advantage of “Thai”/”I,” “Siam”/”I am” rhyming.

Most importantly, our protagonists aren’t ready for prime time. The likeable Sukrit, a pop star back home, has a fluid, restrained singing style. But the character he’s been handed is nothing more than a goofy bumpkin with an America fetish. Katherine, the wife, professes to see in him the soul of a vigorous new Siam, but we never can. When he’s supposed to age into a seasoned diplomat, it’s like a kid playing dress-up.

Katherine looks ravishing in Wade Laboissonniere’s gold and chiffon gown (all the costumes, in fact, dazzle). Yet she’s written with irritating timidity. Despite the character’s “notorious” past, Padgett is directed toward ice queen, then drab artiste and finally fading swan.

If the lady were torn between the carnal and spiritual — a Maugham specialty — the glowing Padgett would have something to play. Instead, she’s saddled with a ridiculous comedy relief ditty in which she asks her maid (J. Elaine Marcos) to teach her the ways of “a good Thai wife.” (Something hubby never says he wants, and something not just out of character but never brought up again.

The climactic act-one bath in the titular waterfall is more awkward than lusty. Why are musicals always so demure about sex, when sex is the engine that always drives them?


L.A. Theater Review: 'Waterfall' with Thai Pop Star Bie Sukrit

Pasadena Playhouse, Pasadena; 652 seats; $125 top. Opened June 10, 2015; reviewed June 11; runs through June 28. Running time: 2 HOURS, 30 MIN.


A Pasadena Playthouse presentation in association with the 5th Avenue Theatre of a musical in two acts with music by David Shire and book and lyrics by Richard Maltby, Jr.


Directed by Tak Viravan. Co-directed and choreographed by Dan Knechtges. Sets, Sasavat Busayabandh; costumes, Wade Laboissonniere; lighting, Ken Billington; sound, Dan Moses Schreier; projections, Caite Hevner Kemp; music supervision and additional arrangements, John McDaniel; orchestrations, Jonathan Tunick; dance arrangements, Greg Jarrett; production stage manager, Andrew Neal.


Emily Padgett, Bie Sukrit, Thom Sesma, J. Elaine Marcos, Eymard Cabling, Marcus Choi, Jordan De Leon, Steven Eng, Rona Figueroa, Kimberly Immanuel, Lisa Helmi Johanson, Kenway Hon Wai K. Kua, Leon Le, Colin Miyamoto, Koh Mochizuki, Celia Mei Rubin, Darryl Semira, Riza Takahashi, Kay Trinidad, Minami Yusui.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Chalie Bijou-Dimant says:

    Bob Verini’s review is both interesting and insightful. Many things described in the review are not much of a surprise. These include the elaborate visually-intriguing sets and dazzling costumes, given Tak Viravan’s multimillion-dollar Thai enterprise known as Scenario is one of the show’s producers.

    Also, it’s not surprising, as Mr. Verini wrote, that the show is struggling to have a foothold for its identity. Why? That’s because the original book (the famous Thai literature Behind the Painting) from which Waterfall’s story was adapted and derived has NOTHING to do with an American woman nor the American culture for that matter. So Noppon having “an American eye”? That sounds like a joke.

    The original story was about Noppon, a young Thai student in Japan, who met and fell in love with Keerati, a older woman, who was a distant member of the Thai royal family.

    So my guess is that the reason why the story in the current show is loose and trying to have its identity in the American theatre scene is only because of Tak Viravan’s desperate attempt to have the show somewhat “tuned” to the American audience so that his tickets would be sold.

    I hope to publish my complete review of this show soon.

More Legit News from Variety