London Theater Review: Ralph Fiennes in ‘Man and Superman’

Man and Superman review Ralph Fiennes

What a piece of work is “Man and Superman”? Hard work, to be frank. George Bernard Shaw’s experimental juggernaut — deemed unstageable in 1903 — makes for three and a half hours of tangled philosophy: a blow-away light comedy weighed down by footnotes. It’s a play for changing times, a bid to throw off the past and make things anew, and yet Simon Godwin’s handsome, modern-dress revival at the National Theater treats it as a cultural artifact. His production abandons its audience, offering no clues for decoding the text, while Ralph Fiennes plays the motor-mouth social reformer Jack Tanner like a tongue-twister challenge. You keep up or else.

Part of the problem is that the old rom-com conventions that Shaw so wholly overturns no longer apply. Today, there’s nothing particularly progressive about Ann Whitefield (Indira Varma) pursuing Tanner, a descendant of Don Juan who is appointed her guardian, nor about a working class manservant outsmarting his aristocrat masters as Elliot Barnes-Worrell’s “New Man” Straker does. Meanwhile, Ann’s sister Violet (Faye Castelow) has defied convention to marry in secret, without parental consent, only she won’t name her new husband. Others might frown, but Tanner’s all for it.

If we don’t see that modernizing spirit throughout — Shaw reworking a staid comic format — all the highfalutin wit and chitter-chatter about revolution and reform (and there’s a lot of it) feels tacked on and arbitrary. Having fled to Spain to escape Ann’s advances, Tanner finds himself ambushed by a band of brigands — all Russell Brand lookalikes led by Tim McMullan’s Mendoza, banging on about the redistribution of wealth and power. “I’m a brigand,” says Mendoza, “I live by robbing the rich.” “I’m a gentleman,” replies Tanner. “I live by robbing the poor.”

As a formal gesture, though, the play still feels radical: Shaw punches a hole in the middle of this breezy comedy of manners. He interrupts proceedings to stage a lengthy debate between Don Juan and the devil, about the nature of man and the various codes by which we live, be they moral, social or political. It’s often cut or sometimes played as a stand-alone short, but it provides the play’s crux and Godwin’s wise to keep it.

If anything, it’s the rest that feels flabby and frustrating, the sort of somersaulting verbosity that gets laughs because it sounds clever, not because it’s funny. One of hell’s debaters talks of weary concertgoers who attend “not because they really like classical music, but because they think they ought to like it.” Cough, splutter, etc. In staging it straight, albeit in modern dress and at a clip to make the last train home, Godwin makes no attempt to remake the play for a contemporary audience. That seems totally against the spirit of the play, and the gorgeousness of Christopher Oram’s set and Luke Hall’s skyscape video design is no recompense.

Instead, we get a posturing, voluminous Fiennes, heeding meter over meaning, as a trustafarian Tanner in humble drainpipe jeans. It’s a performance almost as dated as the text, and his physicality is clumsy and deliberate; half thin-skinned, soft-souled renaissance man, half lascivious gremlin. Varma makes Ann a charming firecracker and McMullan runs wild with the dual role of Mendoza and the Devil, while there’s decent upper-crust support from Nicholas Le Prevost, Ferdinand Kinsley and Faye Castelow.

Still, as Hamlet would say, “Man and Superman” delights not me.

man-and-superman-review-ralph-fiennes

London Theater Review: Ralph Fiennes in 'Man and Superman'

Lyttelton, National Theatre, London; 890 seats; £55 ($77) top. Opened, Feb 25, 2015 reviewed Feb 25, 2015. Running time: 3 HOURS, 30 MIN.

Production

A National Theater production of a play in two acts by George Bernard Shaw.

Creative

Directed by Simon Godwin. Sets and costumes, Christopher Oram; lighting, James Farncombe; sound, Christopher Shutt; video, Luke Halls; movement, Jonathan Goddard.

Cast

Elliot Barnes-Worrell, Nicholas Bishop, Faye Castelow, Clare Clifford, Naomi Cranston, Henry Everett, Ralph Fiennes, Colin Haigh, Nick Hendriz, Corey Johnson, Christine Kavanagh, Mary Keegan, Ferdinand Kingsley, Nicholas Le Provost, Simon Markey, Tim McMullan, Indira Varma, Arthur Wilson.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply

5 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Susan says:

    Violet is not Ann’s sister; she is Tavi’s sister. Ann’s sister is Rhoda, who is referred to but never seen.

  2. freya08 says:

    What an amazing play! I saw it on NT live night from row B in the stalls and was in stitches most of the time. Ralph Fiennes is sublime and a great time was had by all present. People who find it tedious are probably dead from the waist up. And by the way, it’s National Theatre, not Theater. It’s a British word, you know? Go back to your Cats and Spidermen, I’m sure you’ll enjoy those a lot more.

  3. Inthesticks says:

    Nearly 4 hours of tedium, this was surely pushing the envelope back in 1903. But now as another reviewer said it was like Gilbert and Sullivan without the music and the humour . Similar to,Stoppard’s recent hackneyed effort.

  4. zsuzsanna says:

    Dear Mr. Trueman, could you hand me over your first raw ticket? I’ll look the production on the 1st May and after looking it from a better place – there wasn’t any place nearer – we can speak of RF being clumsy etc. He really was, as Voldemort before his death, or the Duke of Devonshire and as Mr. Kendrick in the Cemetery Junction – being stuffed.
    He’s a great and humble actor, who looks always suitable for his part. (your opinion was disgusting a bit -sorry!)

    • zsuzsanna says:

      I saw it and this 6 week meant that Mr. Fiennes has put down his plus weight (if he ever had it ). Man and Superman is my GBS-fav. I listened to Charles Boyer-Charles Laughton Sir Cedric Hardwicke and Agnes Morehead’s Don Juan in Hell in the Lincoln Center’s Library and saw on Hungarian stages several times without the Hell-scene , but I never enjoyed it as much as this performance. Mr. Fiennes is the Superman in this play, he looked young, dynamic , erotic and I smiled through the whole 31/2 hours. I was never bored, but wonderfully entertained hearing Shaw’s witty humor played so clearly audibly (not everybody did it) . I enjoyed Englich language. It was quite different from his M. Gustave, the type of humor was more direct and had a childish feature in it, shortly: he was fascinating. He knows everything of acting and I hope to see him on stage and on screen to get deep impressions.

More Legit News from Variety

Loading