Film Review: ‘What Our Fathers Did: A Nazi Legacy’

Courtesy of Tribeca Film Festival

A troubling study of denial, wartime responsibility and the challenge of dealing with a monster in the family.

How we regard the sins of the fathers is shown to be an inescapably personal matter in “What Our Fathers Did,” director David Evans and writer Philippe Sands’ study of denial, wartime responsibility and the challenge of dealing with a monster in the family. The monsters in question are two long-dead, once high-ranking Nazi Party officials whose sons have chosen to respond to their horrific legacy in dramatically different ways; one of them, unable to accept the depth of his father’s complicity, gives the film its painfully insistent central thrust. Simply structured and narrowly focused, yet replete with unsettling and resonant questions about the difficulty of seeing our loved ones for who they truly are, this troubling, absorbing documentary (now in Stateside theatrical release) offers a sufficiently provocative angle to stand out in the crowded field of Holocaust memorials on screen.

“Imagine what it must be like to grow up the child of a mass murderer,” the film begins, before introducing two men — both born in the fateful year of 1939 — who allow us to do more than just imagine. The first is Niklas Frank, who has spent much of his life denouncing the actions of his father, Hans Frank, a German lawyer who served as Hitler’s personal attorney before becoming governor-general of Nazi-occupied Polish territories during WWII. Convicted of war crimes at Nuremberg and executed, though not before converting to Catholicism and expressing remorse, Hans is remembered here as a figure of unambiguous evil, not least by Niklas himself.

The second subject, Horst von Wachter, is not so willing to condemn his Austrian-born father, Otto von Wachter, an Austrian lawyer who served as governor of Krakow, Poland, and Galicia, Ukraine, at different points during WWII. Unlike Hans, to whom he was subordinate, Otto was never brought to justice before his death in 1949, a fact in which Horst takes refuge. As becomes clear over the course of the documentary, the men’s opinions have been inevitably shaped by their family histories: Whereas Niklas had no relationship to speak of with his cold, unaffectionate dad, Horst recalls a warm, loving upbringing, which he has difficulty reconciling with the reality of his father’s hand in implementing the cruel machinery of the Final Solution.

Making matters even more personal is the figure of Sands, an international lawyer specializing in cases involving genocide and other human-rights abuses, whose article profiling Niklas and Horst served as the basis for Evans’ film. As Sands notes upfront, his family includes many Ukrainian Jews who were rounded up and destroyed as a direct result of Hans Frank and Otto von Wachter’s actions. The tension — and the fascination — of “What Our Fathers Did” lies in the sight of these three men discussing their intertwined histories, always civilly, but not always without discomfort or anger. Sands visits both men’s childhood homes and pores with them over old family photographs (some of which feature Hitler himself), applying calm yet never detached insight as he leads them on a sobering trek down memory lane. In their moments together and apart, Niklas and Horst regard one another as friends who have come to accept the distance between them, though that chasm may be growing too large for them to sustain their friendship for much longer.

Accented by haunting archival footage of the Krakow ghetto — with a pointed focus on the children smiling in the streets, seemingly unaware of the horrors to come — the film builds to three crucial sequences of gradually mounting intensity. The first is a public conversation in London, where attendees take vocal issue with Horst’s refusal to acknowledge Otto’s wrongdoing. In the second, the three men visit the burnt-out ruin of a Jewish synagogue in Zhovkva, Ukraine, followed by the third, in which they walk to the site where 3,500 Jews were murdered, including much of Sands’ family. The key impulse behind these moments — to force Horst von Wachter to face the enormity of his father’s crimes – can seem single-minded, even bludgeoning. Sands, a seasoned and eloquent interlocutor, is not above employing his rhetorical talents in a passionately confrontational manner; given his connection to the matter at hand, you can hardly blame him.

Yet something extraordinary transpires in these moments before the camera, which weaves in and around the three men in long, unbroken takes, observing their exchanges and reactions with an almost unbearable intimacy. Niklas becomes the film’s voice of conscience as he joins Sands in his mournful condemnation of the acts that transpired in these now-haunted spaces. Yet it’s the quietly conflicted figure of Horst that lingers: His evasions can be infuriatingly mealy-mouthed, as he calls for an impossible burden of proof (yielding some insights from Sands about “command responsibility”) and remembers Otto as a fundamentally kind, decent man. His refusal to surrender his image of his father invites our disgust, perhaps, but also our recognition of an all-too-human conundrum — and turns “What Our Fathers Did” into an implicit rumination on what we might have done in his place.

Film Review: ‘What Our Fathers Did: A Nazi Legacy’

Reviewed on DVD, Laguna Hills, Calif., Nov. 8, 2015. (In Tribeca, Jerusalem, San Francisco Jewish, Vancouver, London film festivals.) Running time: 92 MIN.


(Documentary — U.K.) An Oscilloscope Laboratories release of a BFI and BBC Storyville presentation of a Wildgaze Films production in association with Willow Films. (International sales: the Film Sales Co., New York.) Produced by Finola Dwyer, Amanda Posey. Executive producers, Philippe Sands, David Evans, Nick Fraser.


Directed by David Evans. Written by Philippe Sands. Camera (color, HD), Sam Hardy, Philipp Blaubach, Matt Gray; editor, David Charap; music, Malcolm Lindsay; music supervisor, Kle Savidge; sound, Matthew Powell; associate producer, Josephine Davies.


Niklas Frank, Horst von Wachter, Philippe Sands. (English, Ukrainian dialogue)

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Spiegelein says:

    I just watched this documentary on Netflix. Justice Prevails, von Wächter had connections with an Austrian bishop based in Rome, Alois Hudal, who is very well known for having helped Nazis escape. Maybe that’s why Sands didn’t follow up, that would require a whole new documentary to explore “Vatican vs individuals in the Vatican”.

    I was impressed by Niklas’ courage and Sand’s restraint and objectivity, it made for riveting viewing, while Horst’s off-piste and apologist commenys were cringe-worthy. And how happy he looked with the Ukranian Neonazis, for me that clinched the idea that his attitude, as Niklas suspected, didn’t just reflect filial love but something more sinister. Not utterly surprising though; as briefly implied in the film, Austrians haven’t dealt with their Nazi past in the same way that Germans have and in general, the attitude is to consider themselves victims, not perpretators. This could have been explored a little deeper, but overall, a very good documentary.

  2. In a clip from this documentary I noticed that Horst von Wächter states that his father had “strong connections with the Vatican where his father eventually took refuge and died there”. Philippe Sands, who is the human-rights attorney, completely ignores the fact that the Vatican took care of many Nazis including Mr. Von Watchers father. The Vatican has always denied that they gave refuge to Nazis but here is proof that they did with Von’s own words . A good lawyer or reporter would follow up on this statement and try to expose the huge connection between the Nazis and the Vatican.

More Film News from Variety