Oscar Producers Considering Two Hosts in 2016

Key and Peele Emmy
Courtesy of Danny Feld/ Comedy Central

The Academy is trying something new with its Oscar producers this year, and David Hill told Variety, “It’s your fault!”

On March 26, a Variety column urged the Acad to expand its thinking in picking an Oscarcast producer. The org usually hires film producers for the show, but live TV requires a different set of skills — so they should consider veterans of TV sports or concert shows, citing Hill as an example. Academy execs read the piece and began talks with him; the org ultimately tapped into both worlds, with Hill and movie vet Reginald Hudlin sharing duties, as announced Sept. 1. As Hill told Variety on Tuesday afternoon, “Reggie knows film inside out, and I know live television, so we are hopefully going to come up with something interesting.”

On Wednesday morning, Hudlin said their first big decision — picking a host — is a work in progress. An Entertainment Weekly report indicated it would be a team, but Hudlin said that’s only one option. “We’re still very much looking at every possibility. At our first meeting, I mentioned a possible pairing, and David flipped; since then I have thrown out another four or five names and David brought up ideas.” Hudlin said it could be an existing team (rumors bruited Key and Peele, or Amy Poehler and Tina Fey), or it could be a duo who have never worked together: “We have talked about people who might be exciting odd couples,” he laughed.

As for the show, neither producer would share specific ideas, but it’s clear that discussions are already energetic. And, like the Variety-inspired outside-the-box approach in hiring, they are clearly thinking of innovations. “We are in the brainstorming process, when there are no bad ideas,” said Hudlin. “We will explore them all, then eventually take a hammer and chisel to them.”

Hill said, “We’ve talked about the number of cameras, audio, lights, sets, what awards should be given out first, how do we explain the difference between sound mixing and sound editing. The challenge is to make it entertaining, so it doesn’t seem like a lesson, so the audience cares for people when they get onstage.”

He didn’t say so, but the show could borrow a page from his previous work. Hill spent more than 25 years at Fox, working on sports shows (including six Super Bowls) and “American Idol.” All of these used video backstories, offering profiles of athletes or the singing contestants to complement the action. Such backstories could be invaluable to an Oscarcast as it humanizes nominees not well known to the public. (On Tuesday, Hill subtly paid tribute to “the godfather of sports TV,” Roone Arledge, who innovated these “up close and personal” profiles.)

Also in the mix is the spontaneous/emotional factor of the show. Hill said one of the most poignant moments in MTV’s Aug. 30 VMA’s was Justin Bieber’s weeping as the audience welcomed him back. “It was such an intense, human moment. But they blew it; they left the shot, they didn’t stay on it. That was the real drama, a wonderful moment. That’ s what we are aiming for.”

Even if they add new elements to the Academy Awards, that won’t mean a longer show. Hill offered words of relief for Oscar lovers: “The one thing I’ve always prided myself on is finishing a show on time.” Hudlin concurred: “Above all, I want the show to be tight and fast-paced. This is the biggest canvas you can paint on; the world is watching. And we want it to be for movie fans and for filmmakers.”

After this year’s Feb. 22 Oscarcast, Craig Zadan and Neil Meron revealed they’d just concluded a three-year contract with the Academy, which wanted to maintain some continuity in producers, rather than having a new one every year.

So are Hudlin and Hill set for three years? “I don’t know!” exclaimed Hill. “If we screw up, it’ll be goodbye. But if we have as much fun doing this as preliminary conversations have indicated, they will want us back!”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 11

Leave a Reply

11 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Elisabeth Ballou says:

    Seriously consider Justin Timberlake as 2016 Academy Awards Host.
    He’s got; an incredible work ethic, is supremely disciplined, outrageously talented, entertaining & funny, appeals to a wide variety of consumer demographics, is charismatic & some say- even sexy.
    Come on! Give this audience what they don’t know they want!

  2. Sally says:

    Please no Poehler and Fey. They are beyond tedious and predictable. I like Jackman, too, but how about someone new and different for a change? People well established in the movie business, but different. Aren’t we sick of the same old, same old? Good grief. The last few years have been torture. Not that they have the time or would commit, but how about a Tyler Perry? Dwayne Johnson? Somebody, please come up with a new face for this show. Key & Peele would be fine, but not for the whole thing.

  3. Bill B. says:

    If his idea of a great TV moment is Bieber’s embarrassingly fake crying, the show is already in trouble.

  4. Caroline says:

    I love the Oscars and have watched them for years.

    Some of the worst Oscar years were when the producers were hurrying things along. I don’t care how long the Oscars are. They could go for 5 hours and I would be happy.

    I also loathe the up close and personal bits so prevalent in sports coverage. What a time suck, and so insincere. I change the channel or leave the room during those.

  5. cadavra says:

    Why not Martin and Baldwin again? They were terrific in 2010. Stewart and Colbert would be swell, too, though I doubt the latter could get the time off.

  6. Al Swearengen says:

    God please let them choose Key & Peele! If ever there was duo who would inject some life into that tedious affair it’s those two.

  7. Julia Burns says:

    There hasn’t been a better host in years than Huge Jackman. He was a one-man variety show, and great in every talent. Why hasn’t he been back?

  8. Ebenezer says:

    DO NOT get Poehler and Fey. I REPEAT, do NOT get them. The Key and Peele guys would be a FAR better choice. They have natural comedy, not that forced bullshit of Tina Fey and Poehler’s one-trick “comedy” face she uses for every occasion.

  9. Minder says:

    If they get Key and Peele, I’ll DEFINITELY watch this year. Ellen and NPH were the two worst in history, and the Family Guy-guy was terrible.

  10. I am anxiously waiting for any and all updates for this years Academy Awards, it seems like we finally have two Producers who can nail the show. I like their thinking and ideas, so far. Go gettem guys !

More Film News from Variety

Loading