Billy Friedkin Regrets Keeping Gay Kiss Out of ‘Boys in the Band’

'Boy in the Band': Billy Friedkin
Matej Divizna/Getty Images

In 1968, when Billy Friedkin first saw “The Boys in the Band,” he felt the play was “funny and poignant and, in its own way, a love story.” He decided to adapt it as a film, not to make a statement, but because “it was a damn good story.”

As it turned out, it was also relevant. At that moment in time, gays were starting to come out of the closet, Friedkin recalls, and, on one level, “Boys in the Band” was about the closet.

Despite its relevance, the director did not get much encouragement in the marketplace. None of the studios wanted to finance it.

Friedkin finally got a greenlight from Cinema Center Films, then owned by CBS, but the company did not have the funding to distribute or market the film widely. While the movie got good reviews, it did not find a wide audience.

In casting the film, Friedkin approached straight and gay actors. While the roles were rich, there was concern among actors about the price they might pay for playing gay. Tensions came to the fore over a scene in which two of the players would kiss. “This would be the first time a scene with two males kissing would be portrayed in a mainstream film,” Friedkin says. At the moment of truth, the actors reluctantly agreed. Their agents, however, vigorously protested.

After much negotiation, the scene was finally shot, but was not used in the final cut. “We didn’t need it, and I felt it would only sensationalize the piece,” Friedkin recalls. “It was a bad decision,” he adds. “I think we should have kept it.”

In retrospect, none of the straight actors in the cast suffered career damage, the director states. Larry Luckinbill, for example, who is married to Lucie Arnaz, has had a solid career in stage and film.

A decade later, Friedkin shot “Cruising,” a much tougher look at a gritty part of the gay scene. The film stirred more controversy than “Boys in the Band” and was maligned by critics. And like “Band,” it did not find a wide audience.

Friedkin believes movies have played a key role in bringing awareness to gay issues, but notes that this is hardly a new phenomenon. Over the generations, the gay lifestyle has periodically been depicted in live theater, only to encounter a wall of censorship. In 1927 Mae West wrote and starred in a play called “The Drag,” a cross-dressing show that was promptly banned.

In choosing his material, Friedkin insists he has always been motivated by the quality of the script itself, not by the opportunity to seize the soapbox. “I truly don’t believe anyone needs to go public with their sexual preferences,” he declares. “It’s really no one’s damn business.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 6

Leave a Reply

6 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Carly says:

    His first instincts were right, no one wants to see that.

  2. Bill B. says:

    They were both bad films. Cruising was certainly the lesser of the two. It had a story to tell, but man, did they ever tell it badly. It was supposed to be brave and daring. Instead, it was terribly filmed and cowardly. The Boys in the Band was a long running off Broadway hit that ran for years and I saw it at the tail end of it’s run. For some reason, it seemed to work better on stage, but on stage or in film, it is today an insufferable piece of gay cliches, stereotypes with a totally unrealistic plot development. Much of it is supposed to be comedy, but it is really a very sad and pathetic view of gay life. I do not recommend it to anyone. It’s an antique that should be found offensive to any intelligent gay person.

  3. Roy says:

    What does Friedkin mean by the term “sexual preferences?” Surely he is not referring to sexual orientation. If so, he’s a bigot.

  4. No point crying over spilled milk. It was a different time.

More Film News from Variety

Loading