Box Office: ‘Jurassic World’ to Feast on $125 Million Debut

Box Office: 'Jurassic World' Feast on
Courtesy of Universal Pictures

Dinosaurs will rule the earth again.

Universal Pictures’ “Jurassic World” is going to take a monster bite out of the box office when it opens this weekend to a projected $125 million across 4,273 theaters. Universal is being more conservative and saying it expects a debut north of $100 million.

That ranks as the studio’s widest release ever, but the fourth installment in the prehistoric franchise isn’t content with dominating the North American box office. It will bestride the globe, as well, rolling out in 66 international territories, including such major markets as China, Mexico, the U.K., Brazil, Australia, France, Germany, Italy, South Korea and Russia.

That kind of worldwide roll-out means that “Jurassic World” will have sunk its teeth into more than $350 million in receipts when Monday dawns.

The issue with films that arrive with this kind of brand recognition and buzz is that box office prognostication can get euphoric. “Jurassic World” will be huge, but predicting just how massive is an inexact science.

“We’re heading into the same territory where we were with ‘Avengers,’ where things are getting out of control with the numbers,” said Phil Contrino, vice president and chief analyst at BoxOffice.com. “It’s not a matter of whether or not people are interested. It’s how much they like it. Word-of-mouth will dictate how much it explodes.”

Legendary Pictures co-financed the $150 million production, which stars Chris Pratt, hot off of last summer’s “Guardians of the Galaxy,” along with Vincent D’Onofrio and Bryce Dallas Howard. Colin Trevorrow, who made waves with the Sundance favorite “Safety Not Guaranteed,” directs.

“Jurassic World” has the weekend to itself, as studios steered clear of the mighty beasts, the better to not find their prized tentpoles devoured. That will leave last weekend’s champ, “Spy,” hoping to carve out a niche as the adult alternative to all that bloodletting. The Fox comedy had rapturous reviews, but only debuted to a so-so $29 million and change. It should generate $15 million in its sophomore weekend. “San Andreas” could face stiffer competition from “Jurassic World,” and will likely slip to $12 million.

It’s been over a decade since “Jurassic Park III” hit theaters, but this chapter returns the series to Isla Nublar, which has become sort of an Indian burial ground for theme park construction.

Universal has spared no expense hyping the sequel to the hilt, launching spots last November and pushing a well-received Super Bowl spot. It seems to have paid off. Advance ticket sales are sizzling, with Fandango reporting that “Jurassic World” is outpacing each of the summer 2014 blockbusters at the same point in their sales cycle.

After three straight weekends of year-over-year declines, Hollywood is hoping that “Jurassic World” can heat up ticket sales. That might be tall order. “22 Jump Street” and “How to Train Your Dragon 2” opened to big numbers over the same weekend in 2014, pushing the overall box office to $187 million in receipts.

“Those are tough comps,” said Eric Handler, an analyst with MKM Partners. “While you have a massive film in the marketplace, we may only be up a little bit.”

Handler has revised his second quarter box office forecast downwards. He now predicts it will be up 2% to 3% instead of the initial 10% gains he had projected. Still, Handler and other analysts are optimistic about the state of the industry given that “Inside Out” and “Ted 2” are on the horizon.

“There’s a good line-up of films left to come,” said Handler. “We could still have a record summer.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 6

Leave a Reply

6 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Ima Right says:

    well I see all the geniuses were wrong! I agree the original was the best had great story and
    acting and the action CGI scenes were done great without over doing them like 99% of the movies
    today because most have no story and the not many talented actors in Hollyweird today just a
    bunch of same old bland boring annoying pretty faces. I haven’t been to a movie in years just
    because I hate to support Hollyweird and their liberal crap and I just hate most new movies and
    I hate the fact you can’t go to a nice small theater anymore! I hate the big giant screens and sound
    and the CGI and action is so much it’s impossible to watch and hurts my eyes. The last movie I
    paid to see was Appaloosa and it was a great classic western with just great acting and story.
    I wanted to see Mad Max but after the trailers I could see the CGI was over done! no thanks.
    I like all the Jurrassic movies so I’ll probably give in and go see this. or maybe wait for dvd.

  2. LOL says:

    Man, this franchise is meaningless without Spielberg at the helm. The guy knows how to direct the hell out of a scene, ever so effectively using impressionistic devices during the T-Rex scenes in both his movies, where the audience doesn’t entirely see the creatures but witnesses the damage and terror they cause. The original Jurassic Park only has 930 scenes, of which 65 are CGI. Much of it was the profound power of suggestion.

    This movie is gonna be mediocrely bland, methinks. It will throw everything at the screen without divining any needful creative restraint.

    America loves blockbusters.

  3. C.M. Brandt says:

    While yes, Legendary did co-finance, it makes it sound like they split the costs, but their investment was only 20% of the production costs.

  4. Truth says:

    Well, the box office so far has been disappointing in 2015. The expectations for this year were record-breaking while the reality is only a slight bump over last year’s disappointing numbers. And most of the revenue is down to only 2 films: Furious 7 and Avengers 2.

    Everyone in the industry is desperate for Jurassic World to be a hit and I feel that desperation is leading a lot of people to play with the numbers (like with Avengers 2). Remember that according to analysts, Avengers 2 was set to debut with “at least 200 million” and some were saying it was going to break records with up to 220 million. It underperformed within a range of about 20-40 million dollars.

    The same thing may happen with Jurassic World . . . and with all the ads spent on this film it’s going to take a lot to recoup expenses.

    • therealeverton says:

      Age of Ultron do not “underperform”. All it did was not make the ridiculous guestimates of some speculators. Being the 2nd highest opener of all time and one of only a handful of films to get anywhere near $200m, is phenomenal – let’s not judge films on failing to match speculative guesses.

  5. George Valentin says:

    Now, I would have thought with all the publicity that “Jurassic World” would be projected to score more than $125 million at the domestic box office this coming weekend.

More Film News from Variety

Loading