With ‘Steve Jobs,’ Fassbender Shoots to the Top of This Year’s Best Actor Oscar Race

Michael Fassbender in Steve Jobs
Courtesy of Universal

Aaron Sorkin provides the words but Michael Fassbender turns them into music.

TELLURIDE, Colo. — The truth is I half anticipated Michael Fassbender to be a weak link of Danny Boyle’s “Steve Jobs,” which world premiered as a “work in progress” here Saturday night. Something about the repressed accent in the trailer and the curious casting call in the first place, maybe. Whatever the case, let’s just say the “Shame” and “12 Years a Slave” star crushes the role of the eponymous tortured genius and then some in a film that takes bold strides within a well-worn genre and is sure to take off throughout the season…if the character doesn’t put viewers off, that is.

Because that can sometimes be a hurdle. Jobs is very unlikable throughout. It’s the borderline thesis of the film: “It takes a**holes to invent the future.” But that’s what’s so compelling about the picture in this conception. It’s not a greatest hits biopic. It’s a character study interested in how Jobs grows within a 14-year span (the launch of the Macintosh in 1984 through the launch of the iMac in 1998), focusing on his innovations at Apple, his eventual release from the company, his relationship with a daughter he wouldn’t claim for years, his triumphant return to the Apple fold and his volatile rapport with co-workers and colleagues.

Some are already calling it “Birdman” by way of Aaron Sorkin, and there’s a lot of that in there. The gifted scribe’s rat-tat-tat delivery on the page must have yielded a script full of white space, because it’s wall-to-wall dialogue. Like another film at the fest dependent on talking-head drama, Tom McCarthy’s “Spotlight,” it falls on the editor (Elliot Graham) to keep things moving, and indeed, the choice of structuring the film with a series of near-vignettes helps this immensely. But Sorkin has done a marvelous job of picking the right moments of this particular span of time and conveying them with smart and casual ease.

But back to Fassbender: he completely owns the screen for the film’s 125-minute running time. Co-stars Kate Winslet, Seth Rogen, Jeff Daniels, Michael Stuhlbarg, Katherine Waterston and John Ortiz, among others, provide lots of color. And Winslet and Rogen in particular fill in crucial interpersonal shading for Jobs the character. But Fassbender is possessed here, and therefore a no-brainer best actor Oscar contender who just shot to the top of that list alongside gentlemen like Eddie Redmayne (“The Danish Girl”) and Johnny Depp (“Black Mass”) this year.

So call it a contender. “Steve Jobs” just made perhaps the biggest splash of the 42nd Telluride Film Festival so far. And count on Universal hoping that five-year streak of best picture screenings here in the San Juans extends to six.

More on this film, I’m sure, in due time. Keep a lookout for Justin Chang’s official Variety review soon.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 18

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Glenn says:

    I find it amazing that the official television ad for this movie has SEVEN TYPOS! They use inch marks and a foot mark instead of typographer’s quotes – I’m truly embarrassed as a long-time Mac/NeXT graphic designer – and find it incredible that not one person along the ad chain would have noticed that before the ads aired. Very sad.

  2. Sith McGarbage says:

    The top of the Best Actor race, huh? Wow that’s saying a lot considering Dicaprio in Revenant and Depp in Black Mass look like they’re the favorites.

    Paul Dano absolutely crushed it in Love & Mercy so there’s 4.

    • Kayell says:

      I am sure Dicaprio will be great in The Revenant, but I don’t see it being Academy Award worthy of being nominated. At least he is definetly not a favourite compared to Fassbender and of course Raymayne who completely transforms themselves in their roles.

  3. Bill B. says:

    Fassbinder is among the very best working today, but I thought he was totally miscast for this role, so this is both surprising as well as good news.

  4. Mudbudda2014 says:

    Did anyone really know Steve Jobs when he was growing up? He was like a slightly less manic Eisenberg.

    • Mudbudda2014 says:

      With a degree of the emotional depth of a hippie. I think the mental tasks of running his company absorbed a lot of the emotional depth until the last of his life But honestly it always was there, Hidden but there.

  5. Stergios says:

    Give this man his Oscar already. Michael Fassbender is definitely among the most exciting actors of his or frankly any generation and I’m glad to see him earning raves once again for his turn in this and Macbeth as well. His work in Steve Jobs is probably the one that will score a nomination and hopefully a win and I hope to God that acting legend Kate Winslet will return to The Oscars both for this in the Best Supporting Category and The Dressmaker in the Leading.

  6. Jason says:

    Michael Fassbender is my favorite actor, i’ve admired him ever since I saw Shame. My excitement for this film is beyond words right now!!

  7. Kate says:

    There’s an 8 page feature on the film in Time magazine titled “The Man Who Would Be Jobs” where Boyle discusses why he decided to hire Fassbender. Interesting comments there.

  8. ilyaeck says:

    “how Jobs grows within a 24-year span (the launch of the Macintosh in 1984 through the launch of the iMac in 1998)” – looks like the author cannot do basic math …

  9. Justin says:

    He looks like he’s playing Ed Harris’ role in Truman Show in that photo.

More Film News from Variety