Early SAG-AFTRA Deadlines Skew Oscar Process

SAG Award Winners
Sag Awards

With films still left to be seen and even completed, voters have ballots in hand as of tomorrow.

The Oscars may be more than three months away, but tomorrow ballots will go out to the roughly 2,300 members of SAG-AFTRA’s nominating committee, who will then decide on the names to be considered for the 22nd annual Screen Actors Guild Awards. That’s two weeks before the writers and directors guilds, next on the list of industry groups to vote this season. The early date drives awards consultants — and maybe a few filmmakers — crazy, creating a process that absolutely favors movies that come out earlier in the season, one consultant told me. But can anything be done about it?

A handful of movies always miss the deadline for sending screeners to the SAG nominating committee because they come together late in the year. While this can often be mitigated by the screening circuit in New York and Los Angeles, the randomly selected committee is spread across the country. That doesn’t mean screenings can’t be set up for far-flung members, but the degree of difficulty grows for films wrapping in the eleventh hour.

Worse, the pressure of an early deadline can affect the work. Consider a movie like David O. Russell’s “Joy” — a film the director has been struggling to find in the editing room, according to multiple sources — suddenly facing a cut-off far removed from its late-December theatrical release. Sure, these are professionals. Deadlines are a regularity in this business, and indeed, they can often spark inspiration. But who wants to force the creative process just to meet an awards schedule?

Every year there are films — from “Django Unchained” to “The Wolf of Wall Street” to “Selma” — that miss representation at the SAG Awards, yet manage Oscar nominations anyway. But wouldn’t it be easier if SAG-AFTRA just pushed things back to be more in line with other guild calendars, with nominations announced just after the new year?

Part of the issue is a late-January awards show that has to be prepared and produced for television. But with ballots due back on Dec. 7, and nominations announced on Dec. 9, that leaves nearly eight weeks to get things in order — two weeks more than Oscarcast producers have to prepare for the annual Academy Awards after nominations are announced. The holidays generally do grind the process to a halt for a week or two, but the Broadcast Film Critics Assn., by comparison, manages to mount a January show in half the time during this frame, with nominations announced mid-December and the group’s Critics’ Choice Awards airing mid-January.

Nevertheless, SAG Awards spokesperson Rosalind Jarrett Sepulveda insisted it’s just not possible to push the timetable. That’s why the guild annually gives everyone a big heads up by announcing key deadlines in February (indeed, just two days after “Birdman” flew out of the Dolby Theater with the best picture Oscar in tow earlier this year). Moreover, she noted, SAG-AFTRA allows, on a case-by-case basis, for secure digital viewing of films not ready to screen by the Nov. 15 deadline. And online voting was instituted a few years ago to help address the crunch of last-minute viewing. “The timing of the now-compressed winter awards season has become challenging for us all,” she added.

And there’s the rub. The decision to move the Oscars from late-March to late-February in 2005 was the seismic event that has shaken SAG-AFTRA and others along the chain. The awards calendar as it exists now becomes significantly impacted by things like the NFL playoffs, the Super Bowl, the Grammy Awards and, every four years, the Winter Olympics. So in mid-November, with a number of films still left to be seen or even completed, industry voters will be sitting with ballots in hand.

Perhaps the question of timing should be aimed at the Academy. But that’s fodder for another column.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 8

Leave a Reply

8 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. joestemme says:

    I’m in agreement with Jean Pierre, and have written about it on sites like this for a couple of years.

    There should be a hard deadline of November 30th for all movies to be screened and screeners sent out to all guilds and the Academy. If the movie doesn’t make that deadline, it is not eligible. Period. End of discussion.

    P.S. Of course, critics groups are independent and can do what they wish. I am only discussing the Oscars, SAG, DGA etc.

  2. Sophie says:

    The late release probably will hurt Joy to get several SAG nominations or another awards so it’s not shade it’s true. That’s it. However I guess Joy doesn’t become a frontrunner anymore. Spotlight, The Martian, Brooklyn, Room, The Revenant and Carol will dominate everything.

  3. grace says:

    Tapley you’re always trying to shade Russell’s movie. You should to be professional

    • It’s not shade it’s truth. Why are you obsessed with how I might or might not feel about Russell’s movie, a movie I’m very much looking forward to seeing? I’m arguing here that he should have more time and not have to face the crunch of an arbitrary awards deadline. How are you not understanding that?

  4. Jamie says:

    It is all coming down to who cares? If a film can’t be seen by the general public before the end of the year, it can wait. It’s all becoming an “insiders” game of early viewers who then tell the public what to see. The public just yawns as says, why go to the movies or give a damn about the awards? I’ll wait for the video.

  5. Jean Pierre says:

    Release the films before December and the problem is solved. Simple as that. Or release the film the year after.

More Film News from Variety

Loading