MSNBC Edges Out Fox News, CNN in Exploiting Facebook: Study

msnbc logo

E!, NBC Sports and Bravo have highest effectiveness on Twitter, according to analytics firm Engagement Labs

Cable news networks are the most effective among U.S. TV nets at harnessing Facebook’s user base to reach audiences with their content — with MSNBC slightly ahead of rivals Fox News and CNN — according to a new study.

The rankings are based on a proprietary scoring of each network’s reach, impact and and responsiveness by Toronto-based social-media analytics firm Engagement Labs. On Twitter, meanwhile, the firm found that sports and entertainment networks were top performers, led by NBCUniversal’s E!, NBC Sports and Oxygen with the highest scores.

On Facebook, MSNBC has a score (on a scale of 0-100) of 94.11 from Engagement Labs, edging out with Fox News at 93.31 and CNN at 93.21. Among the top Twitter networks, E! has a score of 89.58, with NBC Sports at 88.43 and Oxygen at 88.21.

But what the rankings really mean is opaque.

For one thing, the TV data — pulled directly from Facebook and Twitter — covers only a two-week period, from May 11-24, 2015. Moreover, the firm’s rankings are about effectiveness, not absolute reach. It’s worth noting, for example, that MSNBC has just 1 million followers on Facebook, while Fox News has 10.3 million and CNN has 17.5 million.

Bryan Segal, CEO of Engagement Labs, said the purpose of the company’s eValue ranking is to reflect how well a property engages with users, not simply how many people are following it. “Size is not the only thing that matters. In the social-media realm, the world used to be defined by how many likes or followers you have,” Segal said. “You might have a lot of followers but not many active users.”

Still, in the TV biz, reach matters a lot on social in driving both buzz and, by extension, TV ratings. According to Nielsen, AMC’s “The Walking Dead” had the largest audience among regular series on Twitter over the course of the 2014-15 season, with 4.3 million people seeing tweets about each new episode on average. ABC’s “The Bachelor” recorded the most impressions (total number of times tweets were seen) with 32 million per episode.

Meanwhile, Segal acknowledged that his firm’s rankings of the TV networks, as is the case with the approximately 100,000 global brands it covers as part of its eValue scoring system, can vary widely quarter-to-quarter as companies tune up their social strategies.

Then there’s the question of why Engagement Labs’ ranking of top TV networks on Facebook and Twitter are widely different. According to Segal, news performs well on Facebook because it’s “where you connect with friends, and get relevant, trusted information,” noting that MSNBC has an extremely active user base with very high engagement. Twitter fares better with real-time posts and shares about entertainment and sports, along with news.

“Search used to be the biggest driver of links and eyeballs,” he said. “Now social is a major player, and we’ve seen the power of broadcasters being able to drive content between screens.”

For what it’s worth, here are Engagement Labs’ top 10 rankings for U.S. TV networks on the two major social services:

Facebook
1. MSNBC
2. Fox News
3. CNN
4. Fox Business
5. HLN
6. Logo
7. Al-Jazeera America
8. CNBC
9. Bravo
10. PBS

Twitter
1. E!
2. NBC Sports
3. Oxygen
4. Logo
5. Fox Sports 1
6. Discovery
7. truTV
8. MSNBC
9. Al-Jazeera America
10. Fox Business

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Nicholas P. Schiavone says:

    Dear Todd,
    This could very well be the most foolish “RESEARCH” story I have ever read in any Trade Publication. This does not even sound like you. Just tell me that someone put out a vapid, idiotic press release with your name on it. Really now. There is enough nonsense in this world without adding to the insanity and confusion of casual and serious readers alike. No wonder no one trusts media researchers or the black boxes from which they pull their nuts and imaginary findings.
    Could we have a retraction and no more research without curation in Variety?
    Looking forward to a reply in due course. Thank you.
    Best regards,
    NPS

  2. Sergei says:

    Wow. Now if they could only get more than a few thousand viewers per night to get out of last place.

    • gene says:

      who ever came up with this story is with out a doubt educated beyond their intelligence. But then according to Hillary “What difference does it make”

More Digital News from Variety

Loading