The Questions Still Facing Marriage Equality and Health Insurance

Gay Marriage Health Insurance Questions
Joshua Roberts/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Many years of legal battles, legislative efforts and grassroots organizing have led us to this point: the Supreme Court of the United States deciding on marriage for same-sex couples.

In the past two years, since the decision in (U.S. v.) Windsor, striking down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, more than 60 state and federal courts have overturned marriage bans, and granted the freedom to marry to same-sex couples. This new legal landscape has impacted same-sex couples in many ways. And one of the more important tangible benefits to many couples is the ability to add a spouse to an employee health insurance policy.

Just 10 years ago, the only way a lesbian or gay worker could hope to obtain health insurance for a partner through an employer was through “domestic partner benefits.” At that time, only one state permitted same-sex couples to marry, making spousal health benefits an impossibility for most. Even with domestic-partner benefits, some employers required evidence of shared living space, bank accounts, and affidavits attesting to the length and quality of the employee’s relationship. Many people did take advantage of these benefits, even though the coverage was not as much as if they were allowed to marry.

Now, some businesses are quietly eliminating domestic partnership benefits, and requiring lesbian and gay couples to marry if they want spousal health insurance. This is unfortunate for many couples, gay and straight, who either cannot or do not wish to marry. For example, some couples choose not to marry because marriage would affect their eligibility for need-based financial assistance, or perhaps their visa status for immigration purposes, to name just a few practical reasons. Still other couples decline to marry for personal, religious or philosophical reasons.

The movement to win marriage for same-sex couples has never been about making all loving couples get married. Instead, the fight has always been about valuing autonomy and respect for family diversity, including the ability to choose for ourselves whom to love and how to structure our families. Some couples, gay and straight, choose not to marry, regardless of how committed they are to each other and to their children. These families deserve equal respect and societal support.

Many businesses are examining their health insurance policies and best practices. These companies should be encouraged to keep domestic partner health benefits for both gay and non-gay unmarried couples in place, as well as spousal health insurance policies that treat same-sex couples and different-sex couples equally.

Camilla Taylor is marriage project director of Lambda Legal, which fights for equality.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. BillUSA says:

    Someone tell me why the sexual proclivities of a swath of our population has to be reported upon on a website that is supposed to be about the entertainment industry?

    In lieu of that, someone tell me why some of us get ostracized when we suggest that the entertainment industry (“Hollywood”) is the driving force behind the homosexual agenda?

    The SCOTUS decision is remarkable and I’m one of the last people against it. But I’m also a heterosexual who doesn’t like to be around homosexuals. I don’t run away from them, but I don’t run toward them either. If they’re there and I’m there, that’s just random chance. But they will never be able to stay within my circle of friends because I simply don’t condone what they do for sex. Fear them? Spare me. They wield the -phobic suffix like a sword with a single meaning whenever someone raises a sensible or non-sensible point not in tune with homosexuals.

    That’s a lifestyle of convenience. Heterosexually unattractive people will turn to their own gender to get their satisfaction. Incarcerated individuals are notorious for engaging in homosexuality. Evolution doesn’t work well with homosexuality and vice-versa. So this nonsense of being “born that way” is a disingenuous lie used as a legitimizing device to gain legal standing in the world, and by default, the allowance to intimidate business entities that aren’t in lock-step with their deviant lifestyle.

More Biz News from Variety

Loading