Broadcasters Ask FCC to Put Review of Charter-Time Warner Merger on Hold

Time Warner Charter
Courtesy of Time Warner/Charter

The National Association of Broadcasters says that the FCC should put its review of the proposed merger of Charter Communications and Time Warner Cable on hold, arguing that the agency should first deal with outdated broadcast ownership rules before allowing more consolidation among cable and satellite providers.

In a filing with the FCC on Thursday, NAB contends that the Charter and TW Cable, in their merger petition, “failed to address questions of consumer harm stemming from cable system clustering,” among other things. NAB also contends that the merging parties have “erroneously asserted that the public would benefit from reduced fees” that a bigger company would pay for programming.

NAB wants the FCC to complete a review of broadcast ownership rules, something that it is scheduled to do every four years. But the 2010 and 2014 reviews have yet to be completed. NAB claims that the policies “have warped competition in the video marketplace,” and that they hamper competition given consolidation among pay TV providers.

According to the FCC, the proposed merger of Time Warner Cable, Charter and Bring House Networks would create the third-largest multichannel video provider in the country, with roughly 17.3 million customers. The new company also would have 19.4 million broadband subscribers, creating the second-largest broadband Internet provider in the country.

The FCC is on day 62 of a 180-day timeline for the merger review.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. johj carlson says:

    The one and only reason broadcasters are upset is because they’ll receive less fees. The fewer cable companies there are the less money they get to collect. If not for their absurdly priced fees cable companies wouldn’t have to raise subscribers prices, and could continue to be profitable in their business. It’s because of the broadcasters that MSO’s are merging.

  2. Doug says:

    My roommate has NEVER had a Time Warner account, or a omcast account, for that matter. Even though, the company says he is delinquent on his monthly bill, owing some $240.00!! We have contacted the NY office and they were of no help. They wanted his acct. number, and he had never had an acct. number. I think they laid some bad debt on disabled people whom seldom use a credit card, or ask for credit. How else would it have come up?

  3. mobaby2 says:

    Charter is merging with “Bright House” not “Bring” as this article says.

More Biz News from Variety

Loading