Olympics: Maybe It’s Time to Boycott Boycotts

Sochi Olympics Boycott Gay Rights
Kagan McLeod

Lowry: Don't punish the athletes; use TV to tell the whole story

The Olympics have long been many things that have nothing to do with sports, and it would be naive to think otherwise. Beyond international politics, the Games are a huge marketing apparatus, creating ready-made advertising pitchmen, propaganda opportunities for host countries and potential windfalls for networks, with showbiz values and demographic concerns trumping athletics.

That said, amid an age of cynicism, there is still something noble about the Olympic ideal — nations and their most physically gifted representatives meeting on the track or ice rink, pool or ski slope, in the name of friendly competition.

All that’s a preamble to the latest Olympics to arrive saddled with a preexisting controversy, predicated on Russia’s anti-gay policies. Some have argued the U.S. and others should boycott the Games, sending a message, as the Carter administration did, by skipping the 1980 Olympics in Moscow, in that case, triggered by the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

For those who find the smallest germ of optimism in the Olympics as a concept — or even strictly as a newsworthy event — a boycott was a bad idea then, and is now.

Historically, the Olympic Committee hasn’t done a good job of limiting the right to host the Games to splendid international citizens, whether that was Berlin in 1936 or Beijing in 2008.

Even so, the Games at their best offer hope that supersedes politics. Jingoism has been inevitable, particularly during the Cold War years, but beyond joking about unfair Russian judges, there remains something uplifting about seeing participants vie on a sports field, not a battlefield.

And while there’s always the risk of benefiting an abusive regime, there’s something to be said for the Olympics’ bright light of day being a disinfectant, assuming the media holds up its end of the bargain.

That’s particularly true in this age of reduced international reporting. Amid such retrenchment, anything that compels U.S. news ops to focus attention beyond the country’s borders has potential merit.

So while it’s appropriate for world leaders not to attend— and many have chosen to do just that — sending a delegation with representatives, as in the case of the U.S., such as former tennis star Billie Jean King, speaks much more eloquently than staying home ever could.

It’s worth remembering, too, that the 1980 boycott achieved relatively little — except a quid pro quo for the Games in Los Angeles four years later, when the entire Easter Bloc opted out — while simultaneously depriving athletes, gay or straight, the opportunity to compete. By contrast, many still vividly recall the U.S. hockey team’s “Miracle on Ice” against the Soviets earlier that year.

Of course, supporting the Games comes with certain caveats. NBC Sports has pledged not to ignore the anti-gay laws in its coverage, and critics should hold the network’s feet to the fire given the rather large dog NBC has in the fight, desperately wanting the Olympics to go smoothly and help promote its programming. By the time the torch is doused, expect to be sick of looking at Jimmy Fallon. Displaying a little basic journalism in exchange isn’t a lot to ask.

Nor is NBC the only beneficiary of the the Games. With all those dollars floating around, excess and scandal, including revelations about performance-enhancing drugs, should surprise nobody.

Nevertheless, watch the late Bud Greenspan’s documentaries, beautifully chronicling the Olympics in movies like “16 Days of Glory,” about the ’84 Games in L.A., and whatever reservations might be harbored about Sochi begin to dissipate. It’s better to be there. NBC’s coverage might wind up pandering to younger demos — heavy on X Games-style events and human-interest packaging — but there’s still joy in the exultation of seeing young athletes triumph under enormous pressure.

Few things are completely pure, and the modern Olympics certainly don’t qualify, if they ever did. Still, undermining the international spirit upon which the movement was founded amounts to letting the perfect be the enemy of the good.

In short, let the Games begin.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 2

Leave a Reply

2 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Karl Gerber says:

    A political official in the town where the Olympics are being held stated there were not any gays in the town, but gays would not have any trouble if they abided by the rules. Any political official who naively believes there are not any gays in the town is living a lie. To the extent the homosexual population is forced to hide their sexuality and who they are that is appalling.

    For a variety of reasons some gays would opt not to travel to this town. Who would want to be in a town where others with their identity are quashed into a lie? Where the social/political scene for their identifying group is supposed to not exist? Where they would be an unwelcome minority only accepted for a limited period because the whole world is watching the town during the Olympics?

    The Olympic Committee should consider the offensiveness of a venue to potential populations. The games are not supposed to exist to make a minority feel unwelcome. A venue where women were not allowed to see the games, or were forced to wear wigs would be equally inappropriate.
    For labor law articles I have written about representing gays, transgenders, and persons of alternate sexual orientations, visit: http://www.worklawyeroc.com/gay-rights-attorney-orange-county/

    Otherwise, I leave you with a quote from a book I recently published called Modem Stud partially about adolescent youths whose nascent sexualities are challenged by the thought there is a gay population:

    “What follows is likely to offend somebody because anything of any worth always does. After all, adolescent boys are bound to question their sexuality while middle-aged women mistrust the maturity of their beauty.”

    Karl Gerber, Esq. Representing Employees Since 1993

  2. If the Olympics were to be boycotted, it should happen because of Putin’s brutal regime.

    Both Barack Obama and Joe Biden are effectively boycotting the Olympics by not attending. For the American president or vice president to attend the Olympics in Sochi—where Russia’s brutal dictator-for-life Putin has a summer dacha—would be tantamount to attending Hitler’s Olympics in Berlin.

    See http://naegeleblog.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/russias-putin-is-a-killer/#comment-3232 (“Obamas, Biden To Boycott Killer Putin’s Winter Olympics In Russia”) (see also the article itself, as well as the other comments beneath it)

More Voices News from Variety

Loading