TV Review: CW’s ‘The 100’

The 100 CW TV Review

Saying that a show plays on two levels can seldom be taken quite so literally as in “The 100,” a better-than-average CW sci-fi drama that splits its story into two halves: The 100 young people of the title, who’ve been jettisoned down to see if they can re-inhabit a nuclear-ravaged Earth and establish a society, “Lord of the Flies” style; and the adults above on a floating space station, wondering how long their resources will hold out, in what amounts to a poor man’s “Battlestar Galactica.” Parts of the plot and casting fall short, but there are enough elements in this ambitious serial to hope the show doesn’t run out of ideas — or air.

The premiere of the series, based on a book by Kass Morgan, moves a little too fast in establishing the rules, introducing a space-bound society 97 years after nuclear annihilation, where any crime is a capital offense — unless the perpetrator happens to be under the age of 18.

So the equivalent of a juvenile-hall facility (played by actors who generally look considerably older) are shipped down to the planet. It’s an act of necessity, unbeknownst to the inhabitants, because the Ark — the collection of space stations where three generations have lived — is running short of air and will soon have to start “floating” people.

Think of the colonists as the expendables, only with acne instead of an AARP plan.

Among the kid contingent is Clarke (Eliza Taylor), the daughter of the station’s doctor, Abby (Paige Turco), whose husband was turned into space debris for wanting to go public with the bad news. This has put Abby at odds with the group’s leader, Chancellor Jaha (Isaiah Washington, rebounding from his “Grey’s Anatomy” floating), and his No. 2 (“Lost’s” Henry Ian Cusick), the latter appearing a bit too eager to impose a mass death sentence to help preserve precious resources.

Clarke’s version of Eve, meanwhile, immediately finds a potential Adam in Finn (Thomas McDonell), though like any apocalyptic romance, it’s not without complications. She also butts heads with the colonists’ de facto leader (Bob Morley), whose resentment against those in power comes with its own detailed backstory.

Developed by Jason Rothenberg, “The 100” plays best up in space, and at times feels a little too much like “Futuristic Earth, 90210” down on the planet, where — heady over their exposure to fresh air — the youthful pioneers begin to feud and squabble, as well as discover all is not paradise. That includes the realization there might be more than just two-headed deer to endanger them. (The threats are generally teased out in a manner meant to build suspense, but that also suggests there wasn’t a budget to do a whole lot more.)

Nitpickers will complain about how being marooned on an annihilated Earth clearly hasn’t interrupted the flow of hair and makeup products, or the fact the kids occasionally behave like they’re in Daytona Beach for spring break. Yet even with some shaky performances, there’s enough happening — including a few genuine surprises in the first half-dozen episodes — to sustain interest.

In success, of course, “The 100” isn’t just a reference to those trying to re-inhabit Earth, but also a syndication-friendly wish as to how many episodes CW would like the show to run. And there’s certainly no shortage of narrative possibilities.

Helped by its “Arrow” lead-in, the series might have a shot at survival. Still, as they say both in TV and around the Ark, just don’t hold your breath.

TV Review: CW's 'The 100'

(Series; CW, Wed. March 19, 9 p.m.)


Filmed in Vancouver by Alloy Entertainment in association with Warner Bros. Television.


Executive producers, Matt Miller, Jason Rothenberg, Bharat Nalluri, Leslie Morgenstein, Gina Girolamo; producer, Jae Marchant; director, Nalluri; writer, Rothenberg; based on the book by Kass Morgan; director, Nalluri; camera, Nathaniel Goodman; production designer, Matthew Budgeon; editor, Hunter M. Via; music, Even Frankfort, Marc “Doc” Dauer, Liz Phair; casting, Barbara Fiorentino, Danielle Aufiero. 60 MIN.


Eliza Taylor, Paige Turco, Thomas McDonell, Isaiah Washington, Henry Ian Cusick, Marie Avgeropoulos, Bob Morley, Devon Bostick, Christopher Larkin

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 6

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Judy says:

    I no longer watch 100, not because I don’t like. I watched the first series and loved it, but when the second started I turned it off. The music is so overpowering that you can’t hear the dialog! So what’s the point in what it. I know you’re thinking it my smart TV, but it isn’t, I’v talked to Samsung and they have no control of how the production network set their volume. I have several friends that stopped watching 100 also because of the loud distracting music that overpowers the dialog.

  2. Aerin says:

    I’m really enjoying this series. I don’t understand why it’s gotten such bad reviews — maybe just because it’s on the CW?

  3. PRS says:

    The new 100 Series on the CW is poorly thought out science fiction. 1st why would you send 100 social misfits to survive on a hostel environment with no organization, no supplies, no technology, no experience, no communication of any kind, no rudimentary weapons or instruction “how to” of any kind. They are suppose to pave the way for resettlement, how? It is like a teenage Lord of The Flies scenario, and it only gets worse. What a waste of good actors and money. Do it right and the studios the sponsors and the audience all benefit. Currently, It is not worth watching. To bad I really like science fiction.

  4. Ken says:

    Lord of the Flies meets The Hunger Games

  5. Jax says:

    I haven’t watched or cared about anything on the CW for years. So it’s really telling that I am interested enough to actually tune in and watch this show.

  6. Living the Geek Life says:

    Loved the book, so I’m hoping for good things from this series. Even if it’s a CW series.

More TV News from Variety