Theater Review: ‘Speed-the-Plow’ Starring Lindsay Lohan

Speed the Plow review Linsday Lohan

Nobody ever chose to go to the theater to watch an actor be adequate. Sadly, “adequate” sums up Lindsay Lohan’s London stage debut in David Mamet’s “Speed-the-Plow.” The bad news, however, is that she’s not the problem. Director Lindsay Posner has badly miscast Richard Schiff as testosterone-fuelled movie exec Bobby. That decision forces Nigel Lindsay’s increasingly enraged producer Charlie to work too hard to drive the pace. A hot production can make this neatly twisty but minor Mamet feel major. At the end of Posner’s, you just think: “Huh.”

Pre-opening rumors focused on Lohan using a prop book for help with her lines and needing off-stage prompts, but on opening night she survived with just one of the latter. However, although she fits the bill as temporary secretary Karen (who may or may not be secretly on-the-make), she doesn’t yet know how to generate and share energy with other actors onstage. She dutifully expresses the intention of each line but there should be more to Karen than meets the eye. Because Lohan is unable to handle subtext, the character — and thus the drama — loses dimensions.

Following a bet over what’s in his trousers rather than what’s in his head, Bobby has pretended to do Karen a favor, inviting her to his apartment to hear what she thinks after being allowed to do a “courtesy” read of a novel that he and Charlie have written off as ludicrously portentous psychobabble. To his surprise, she sees huge movie potential in it.

But for the stakes to rise as Mamet needs, Karen’s description of her vision of the movie has to sound winning. Alas, Lohan’s voice is so unvarying that the movie never sounds plausible, which diminishes tension and fatally undermines both Bobby’s behavior and the third-act plot twist.

Lohan is, understandably, headlining but Karen is merely the pivot. The real subject is the relentless and ultimately ruthless jockeying for position of the two men. They’ve kidded themselves that they’ve been friends for eleven years but the play reveals them to be fierce rivals with Charlie lusting after Bobby’s studio power. Schiff, however, appears to be almost a generation older which make him look paternal and unbalances this central relationship. Worse, as Schiff showed in his signature role as pensive Toby in “The West Wing,” his stock-in-trade is earnest and world-weary. He looks like a man at the end of his career and his tether, which is not the way the role is written and the strain of him powering up lickety-split dialogue really shows.

Lindsay’s ascent into towering rage is impressive but Posner’s pacing and balance is off, so the climax is never truly frightening. The recent London revival with Kevin Spacey, a man fuelled by rage, evenly matched against Jeff Goldblum, showed just how overwhelmingly fierce the final scene can be. The fact that that high-profile production was only five years ago rather undercuts Posner’s public denial that this staging is a case of stunt casting. A set of seriously lame local reviews have backed up the prosecution’s case.

speed-the-plow-review-lindsay-lohan-west-end-richard-schiff

Theater Review: 'Speed-the-Plow' Starring Lindsay Lohan

Playhouse Theater, London; 800 seats; £59.50, $96 top. Opened, reviewed Oct 2, 2014. Running time: 1 HOUR, 35 MINS.

Production

A Danny Moar and Simon Friend for Theater Royal Bath presentation of a play in two acts by David Mamet.

Creative

Directed by Lindsay Posner. Sets and costumes, Robert Innes Hopkins; lighting, Paul Anderson; sound, Andy Graham; production stage manager, Howard Jepson.

Cast

Nigel Lindsay, Lindsay Lohan, Richard Schiff.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. ChrisM says:

    There is truly little wrong with stunt casting if those chosen have the talent required to perform the role. Unfortunately headlining Lohan in a minor role makes the casting an obvious stunt of little merit.

  2. BobbieFisher says:

    To be a great actor, one must possess intelligence. Some great actors do stupid things once in awhile, but the intellect is always there, they grasp the finer details that the mediocre B, C, and D list actors miss. Then there’s Lohan, an actor that has neither the intelligence, nor the very will to grasp the structure, the complexity, or the reflection of life that they are portraying. Lohan is the stupid actor who in her childhood did some rare, seemingly intelligent work. But just as the smart actor sometimes screws up, the dumb ones can get the occasional hit. This obvious stunt casting has bit Posner on the ass because, let’s face it, even if Lohan was sober (which is completely dubious – she was out until 3am at nightclubs the night before her opening) even if sobriety was achieved, she would never be able to turn out a West End worthy performance due to her cretinism. She barely understands that the first thing an actor does is memorize their lines. Her presence has placed this production in jeopardy from an artistic standpoint, and was hopefully going to make money from a fiscal standpoint. Not surprisingly they are achieving neither artistic, nor fiscal satisfaction. Sadly, Lohan is no longer an actor. She lacks the basic tool of knowledge of life outside nightclubs, thus no matter what she does, stage or screen, comedy or tragedy, Lohan will always put out a one note, monotonous, illiterate, wooden, substandard performance. It’s all about brains, and Lohan has fried hers a long time ago.

  3. Carly says:

    Maybe if they had one more “Lindsay” involved (perhaps catering?), it would’ve elevated the show to slightly above average.

More Legit News from Variety

Loading