Film Review: ‘Walk of Shame’

Walk of Shame Movie Review

Not even the fleet comic footwork of Elizabeth Banks can save this vile, unfunny stab at screwball farce.

Watching the redoubtable Elizabeth Banks try to breathe life into the stillborn farce “Walk of Shame” is like watching a team of paramedics perform CPR on the corpse of Ulysses S. Grant. Indeed, it’s an ill-tempered housecat who elicits just about the only real laugh in writer-director Steven Brill’s hapless mash-up of “The Hangover” and “After Hours,” an erstwhile FilmDistrict title (originally slated for release last September) being dumped by Focus into a handful of theaters concurrent with its VOD debut. Banks deserves far better, to say nothing of the audience.

As she ably demonstrated in “The 40-Year-Old Virgin,” “Role Models” and “Slither,” Banks is a first-rate comedienne with real screwball elan, which makes it all the more disappointing that this seemingly tailor-made star vehicle is such a bust. You can’t blame the actress, who gives it her all (and then some) as Los Angeles newscaster Meghan Miles, whose personal and professional lives seem to go up in smoke in the course of a single day. Ditched by her fiancee and passed over for a promotion to the network anchor desk, Meghan resolves to drown her sorrows during a raucous girls night out with her two BFFs (Gillian Jacobs and Sarah Wright Olsen) — a night that ends with Meghan in the comforting arms of a handsome bartender/“postmodern romantic fiction” writer (James Marsden).

When all hope seems lost, Meghan gets a message from her producer that the network job is back in play. But in her hasty scramble, Meghan finds herself locked out of her new beau’s downtown apartment sans phone, purse or car and must find her way back to civilization (and the news desk) — clad in a skin-tight, banana-yellow dress and stiletto heels. That dress — about the only thing in this grimy-looking movie that qualifies as a visual idea — proves to be a crucial impediment, causing Meghan to be mistaken for a stripper/hooker by a lecherous taxi driver (“Borat” sidekick Ken Davitian), a couple of bumbling cops (Ethan Suplee and Bill Burr) and a trio of kindly crack dealers (Lawrence Gilliard Jr., Alphonso Mcauley and Da’vone McDonald). If that joke isn’t especially funny or inspired the first time around, by the sixth time it has become a kind of comic waterboarding.

Most of Meghan’s journey takes her through stretches of South and Central L.A., which Brill (“Little Nicky,” “Drillbit Taylor”) renders as the exclusive domain of addicts, dealers, pimps and other assorted vagrants, nearly all played by actors of color in a movie whose race politics are just this side of Donald Sterling’s. Marsden, who proved his own formidable comic chops in “Enchanted” and “Anchorman 2,” seems relieved to be spared the brunt of the movie’s humiliations, relegated to periodic reaction shots as he follows Banks’ breadcrumb trail with Jacobs and Olsen in tow.

Film Review: 'Walk of Shame'

Reviewed on VOD, New York, May 2, 2014. MPAA Rating: R. Running time: 94 MIN.


A Focus Features release of a Focus World/Lakeshore Entertainment/Sidney Kimmel Entertainment presentation of a Lakeshore Entertainment/Sidney Kimmel Entertainment production. Produced by Sidney Kimmel, Tom Rosenberg, Gary Lucchesi. Executive producers, Eric Reid, Ted Gidlow, Jim Tauber, Bruce Toll, Matt Berenson, Peter Schlessel.


Directed, written by Steven Brill. Camera (Deluxe color, RED Digital Cinema, widescreen), Jonathan Brown; editor, Patrick J. Don Vito; music, John Debney; music supervisors, Brian McNelis; Eric Craig; production designer, Perry Andelin Blake; art director, Alan Au; set decorator, Karen O’Hara; costume designer, Lindsay Ann McKay; sound (Datasat/Dolby Digital/SDDS), Steve Morrow; supervising sound editor, Steven Ticknor; re-recording mixers, Tateum Kohut, Steven Ticknor; visual effects, Method Studios, Furious FX, Look Effects, Cutting Edge; stunt coordinator, Darrin Prescott; assistant director, Stephen Hagen; casting, Deborah Aquila, Tricia Wood, Jennifer Smith.


Elizabeth Banks, James Marsden, Gillian Jacobs, Sarah Wright Olsen, Ethan Suplee, Bill Burr, Kev Davitian, Lawrence Gilliard Jr., Alphonso Mcauley, Da’vone McDonald, Eric Etebari, Oliver Hudson.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 10

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Todd says:

    This movie is super funny! Banks’s performance is soooo funny. Same with the other cast–bus driver, the friends, the “dealers,” etc.
    Just because “Chief Film Critic” Scott Foundas says this movie’s “vile” doesn’t mean it is. I think things start out uncomfortably because there is (maybe) a narrative desire to broadly introduce the Meghan character as the typical career-oriented but somewhat emotionally-destitute woman, blah blah. But once she leaves her new boyfriend’s house in the middle of the night it just gets better and better and better. Believably “Kafkaesque.” And it’s light and breezy and silly and unbelievable. Banks is reacting but not in typical ways that we expect from the Character-for-whom-everything-is-going-wrong.

  2. ames says:

    Call it a case of ‘lowered expectations’ if you’re that cynical, but I thought this movie was enjoyable enough. It’s not out to change anyone’s life or teach an ‘important lesson’- it’s just meant to blithely entertain for 90 minutes. And it did. But of course, at today’s cineplex, where even ‘indie’ movies cost upwards of $50 million to make and market, there’s no room for that. So, I suppose film critics for Variety and such have to prove their mettle accordingly and look down on anyone who would go to the movies for sheer entertainment.

    • Dave Baxter says:

      Oh yes, YOU were entertainment must mean EVERYONE will be entertainer. At least the critic only talks about his opinion of the movie. You’re actually arrogant enough to think your opinion grants you the right to do personal attacks. Your high horse is much higher than his, friend.

  3. Bill Wilson says:

    I couldn’t even make it through the trailer – looks execrable.

  4. randy leadge says:

    what he talking about ?? the trailer is really funny and of course it takes place in a seedy area and that is what is it is like there, yes there are black people there. I never caught what he specificially is disappointed in its a great premise for a show & Elizabeth Banks is a perfect cast. The charactor actors and situations are well chosen. Get a sense of humour – what is his idea of a good comedy and why would that comedy be different?

  5. Frederick says:

    The more he uses words he looked up in the Microsoft Word right-click thesaurus, the more he sounds like a [rhymes with whoosh]. And ooohhh, look, he referenced Donald Sterling and waterboarding, he really is on top of current events too! Stop trying to sound clever, it’s not working.

    • Barry says:

      What words did he use, besides perhaps “elan,” that would require the use of a thesaurus? Unless words like “lecherous” or “formidable” are a bit too brainy for you, in which case you should probably go back to leafing through US Weekly.

More Film News from Variety