Film Review: ‘Tarzan’

Kellan Lutz "Tarzan" Film

Edgar Rice Burroughs' hero has seldom looked more primitive, despite the use of motion-capture, 3D and various other modern gimmicks.

Tarzan wears his trademark loincloth while the actor playing him sports a full-body motion-capture suit in Constantin Film’s clunky-looking riff on the Edgar Rice Burroughs character, which gives literature’s most organic hero a robotic, pre-“Polar Express” appearance. Targeted at a generation raised on CGI and the idea that men don’t grow body hair, this English-language reboot gambles on big B-movie setpieces, hoping the spectacle will disguise shortcuts taken in the design department. “Tarzan” is an eyesore for anyone above the age of 10 — literally, for those opting to see it in badly miscalibrated 3D — and will lean on heavy marketing for modest returns as it swings through various international territories.

In several of Europe’s larger megaplexes, one can presently find 7-foot fiberglass Tarzan standees — broad, muscular shoulders tapering down to a narrow girlish waist atop a pair of delicate long legs — posted like mannequins for the latest in jungle-ready underpants. The fixture in Berlin’s Cubix theater has lost his wig, revealing one of the weaknesses in an otherwise hubba-hubba design: It looks as if someone tried to attach fake hair to the head of a shapely (and fully “man-scaped”) Greek statue, his vacant Ken-doll expression all but incapable of communicating emotion.

This is the Tarzan audiences can expect from the opportunistic German production, animated by Hannover-based Ambient Entertainment, which handled CG African critters just fine in 2010’s “Animals United” and manage the monkeys just fine here, but are clearly out of their depth when dealing with humans. Swooping in before Warner Bros.’ big-budget 2016 relaunch, Constantin acquired the Tarzan rights in 2010 after Disney let them lapse, and their relatively quick-turnaround toon relies almost as heavily on the Mouse House’s idea of the character as Burroughs’ own. Not only does the silhouette evoke that 1999 hand-drawn version, but this is also a more talkative Tarzan than most of his live-action predecessors, with Kellan Lutz (the second Calvin Klein model to play the role, following Travis Fimmel’s smallscreen stint) providing wall-to-wall narration.

But this is no mere origin story. When Lutz says, “Let’s start at the beginning,” he means 70 million years earlier, “when the giant dinosaurs ruled the earth.” Certainly, that makes for a more dramatic opening than even Burroughs’ pulp-primed wits could have imagined, as audiences witness a giant meteor crash-land in the jungle and wipe out the big CG brutes. Cut to the late 20th century, as the Greystoke family arrives in search of a mysterious energy source. Writer-director Reinhard Klooss packs several setpieces into the first reel, serving up a fierce battle between silverback gorillas and the helicopter crash that leaves young Greystoke orphaned.

But there’s a cold, calculated efficiency to the storytelling. The pic hits the obligatory marks — young Greystoke adopted by Kala, swinging through the jungle, discovering Jane Porter (Spencer Locke) and so on — without pausing to make Tarzan seem at all human in the process, which is no small problem given his stiff, all-digital appearance. Visually, the character animation smacks of yesterday’s videogame technology (where motion capture is a more accepted technique), while the fuzzy-looking 3D suggests that scenes designed for HD television sets have been blown up for the bigscreen without the necessary stereoscopic adjustments.

The story circles around to the meteor again, clearly aiming for that same tricky blend of real-world adventure and supernatural danger that the Indiana Jones series rekindled three decades earlier. Tarzan is quick to learn English, though not before pantomiming his way through a classic “me Tarzan, you Jane” scene. Before long, the couple are juggling romance and various eco-pitfalls, with Tarzan swinging through the jungle one moment and running barefoot across snowy mountain tops the next.

The motion capture feels like a stunt, while the stunts … don’t. Physics barely apply, and the thrill of watching Tarzan fling himself through the foliage — even in 3D — hasn’t advanced much since the Disney days. One of the surest signs that not enough attention has been paid to the details is the way that characters’ faces nearly always appear to be in shadows, while the plot — in which Tarzan tries to stop an opportunistic capitalist (Trevor St. John) from robbing the jungle of its most precious resource — seems more than a little ironic. Surely someone at the Burroughs estate must have felt the same way.

Film Review: 'Tarzan'

Reviewed at UGC Cine Cite les Halles, Paris, Feb. 19, 2014. Running time: 94 MIN.


(Animated — Germany) A Metropolitan Filmexport (in France)/Constantin Film (in Germany) release of a Constantin Film presentation and production, in association with Ambient Entertainment. (International sales: Summit Entertainment, Los Angeles.) Produced by Robert Kulzer, Reinhard Klooss. Executive producer, Maritn Moskowicz.


Directed, written by Reinhard Klooss, based on the Tarzan stories created by Edgar Rice Burroughs. Camera (color, HD, 3D), Markus Eckert; editor, Alexander Dittner; music, David Newman; production designer, Henning Ahlers; motion capture art director, Uwe Stank; sound (Dolby Atmos), Markus Dobler; sound designers, Stefan Busch; supervising sound editor, Stefan Busch; re-recording mixer, Christoph Merkele; animation supervisors, Robert Kuczera, Benedickt Niemann, Jurgen Richter, Nicolai Tuma; character designers, Peter Oedekoven, Sven Kroog; choreographer, Peter Elliott; line producer, Bernhard Thur; associate producer, Holger Tappe; casting, Rick Montgomery.


Voices: Kellan Lutz, Spencer Locke, Trevor St. John, Les Bubb, Jaime Ray Newman, Mark Deklin, Aaron Kissiov, Anton Zetterholm. (English dialogue)

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 4

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. This Tarzan is a family favourite. We were not looking for a faithful reproduction of the 100-year-old novel and obviously that was not what Klooss had in mind. The movie is beautifully rendered; equipped with a fast-passed story line; and leaving us wanting for more. The sequel should be a doozy. The critics can go home and sharpen their wits for the next round.

  2. Anthony De Motta says:

    The film was good enough. I saw no problems with the CG animation nor the story. It’s a hell of a lot better than the endless adaptations imagination bankrupt Hollywood has put out. The only other Tarzan worth watching is Legend of Greystoke. Everything else is crap, like your review.

  3. Simo Karjalainen says:

    So, there will never become a true, original Burroughs’s Tarzan on a movie? Always only disappointments – due to producers will of leaving their fingerprints on this unique superhero! I have been waiting my lifetime in vain.

  4. heroes says:

    Three Musketeers, Immortals, Pompeji and now Tarzan. One has to wonder when Constantin, Kulzer and Moskowicz will file for financial bankruptcy, they sure have already filed for creative bankruptcy……

More Film News from Variety