Film Review: ‘DamNation’

DamNation Review

The SXSW prize winner is a visually stunning but relatively tame eco-issue doc sponsored by clothing company Patagonia.

Despite the hellfire-and-brimstone title, “DamNation” proves to be a relatively tame eco-issue doc that prioritizes visually stunning nature photography over inflammatory rhetoric and dire prognostications. An audience award winner at this year’s SXSW Film Festival, the second feature from documentarians Ben Knight and Travis Rummel was sponsored by California-based clothing company Patagonia, which plans screenings at 30 retail locations on June 5 following limited theatrical runs in New York, Los Angeles and Portland. The support of an influential brand and imminent streaming release should give the pic a better-than-average shot at connecting with environmentally conscious viewers, who are sure to remember the lush imagery far longer than any of the flimsily presented information about the abundance of dams in the U.S.

Although we’re told early on that more than 75,000 dams exist in the U.S., and “DamNation” clearly believes that’s not a good thing, Knight and Rummel leave more questions than answers as to exactly why we’re better off without them. Jumbled history lessons establish President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s enthusiasm for dam building as an economic boon in the wake of the Great Depression, something that Knight’s own folksy narration explains ultimately went “too far.”

While dams provided welcome hydropower along with employment, resistance to their construction has been longstanding in environmental circles. For many years, those who objected to the limitations these concrete monoliths imposed on nature’s previously free-flowing rivers were largely branded as kooks. That’s no longer the case, and due to reasons that owe as much to economic factors as environmental ones, many dams are being demolished (the impressive spectacle of which is seen here, in footage obtained by the filmmakers with a high degree of difficulty).

So it’s all the more confounding that “DamNation” does little in the way of presenting the pros alongside the cons of dams, resulting in cheerful feature-length propaganda that seems to be disagreeing with no one in particular. A token visit to a “Save Our Dams” protest group results in zero interviews but a lot of interchangeable shots of old white folks, while the disclosure that no pro-dam politician wanted to participate with the filmmakers comes as little surprise. The lone voices in support of dams come from a few power facility employees who will be out of a job when the structures are destroyed.

Without any vocal dissent, the dramatic burden here falls on the plight of salmon unable to migrate to their historic spawning grounds due to dams. This in turn ropes in related issues like the proliferation of costly and ethically dubious fish hatcheries as compensation for reduced fish presence in certain areas, and the disruption to Native American customs born out of annual salmon runs. As arbitrarily as these issues are raised, they’re just as randomly dropped, and the film’s haphazard focus muddies the waters without doing anything to clarify the overall stakes.

Fortunately, the continual visual splendors make a rather striking argument of their own. A shot of salmon swimming free, juxtaposed with the brutality of a hatchery, is an old trick but an effective one in this context. And Knight, who also serves as d.p. and editor, magnificently captures the natural beauty of unencumbered rivers to provide a perfect contrast with the hulking man-made obstacles that dams represent to nature’s free will.

A visit with lively 94-year-old folk singer Katie Lee (who could inspire a documentary all her own) emerges as the heart of the film. Her spirited recollections of a fateful 1950s vacation in Glen Canyon, Ariz., paint a vivid picture of the area before it was submerged under the waters of a dam-made reservoir. They’re driven home by photos and home movies revealing a thirtysomething Lee frolicking in nature (occasionally in the buff, though she swears there was no “hanky-panky” with her male companions), and once again it’s the images that best illustrate the natural wonders diminished by a dam-obsessed nation.

Film Review: 'DamNation'

Reviewed online, New York, May 15, 2014. (In SXSW Film Festival — Documentary Spotlight.) Running time: 88 MIN.


(Documentary) A Patagonia presentation of a Stoecker Ecological and Felt Soul Media production. Produced by Matt Stoecker, Travis Rummel. Executive producer, Yvon Chouinard.


Directed by Ben Knight, Travis Rummel. Camera (color, HD), Knight; editor, Knight; music supervisors, Knight, Bodie Johnson; sound, Todd Hannigan, Jason Mariani; animation, Kevin Howdeshell, Kristen Howdeshell; associate producer, Beda Calhoun.


Ben Knight, Travis Rummel, Mikal Jakubal, Bruce Babbit, Kevin Yancy, David James Duncan, Elmer Crow, Jim Waddell, Katie Lee.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Realist says:

    The hard facts are that these dams produce just a ridiculous amount of non-carbon emitting power. Unless we replace that with a ton of coal and nuclear plants, or people just decide to stop using power, there is no way to replace this power. Solar, wind, and wave energy help (and yes wind is curtailed when the river has to move and the grid can’t handle the additional wind load, but that isn’t often), but in reality anyone that says they are a viable substitute has either no understanding of, or has chosen to ignore, the regions power demands. This film offered a single sided story, which while sad, did not address the complicated matter of how do we do tear down the dams and still meet energy demand without heavily polluting the environment. Remember that if we emit a ton of carbon then that will just accelerate the warming of the environment. If the BC mountains don’t get that snowpack to supply to the river, the fish are in an even worse situation than they are now. The only viable non carbon alternative is nukes, and then we worry about where to safely store the waste.

    • Lou Hoebel says:

      A fine and balanced film.

      Right. Yes. Less power consumption. Sooooo much power is lost in transmission ( and wasteful practices, lifestyles, etc) that no increase in carbon is needed.

      Solar on every apprpriate house? offshore wind? biomass? Conservation !! No shortage of options.
      Fresh fish from our rivers – not flown in from South America. The alternative option is a winner from multiple angles.

      • Ben says:

        A fine film but not balanced at all. I agree that many dams are useless and should be removed. They mentioned nothing of drinking water provided by dams. The film isn’t about hydropower or not, but of the usefulness of dams. Millions of people rely on surface water as a municipal source that isn’t possible without dams. I agree with the removal of most of the dams featured in the film; I just wish they would have explained that not all dams serve the same purpose. The propaganda feel of the film isn’t going to win supporters in my opinion. And that’s coming from a supporter of many dam removals.

More Film News from Variety