Film Review: ‘After the Dark’

After the Dark Review

A talky, tedious and carelessly implausible what-if fantasy that puts a cast of young hotties through successive doomsday scenarios.

Credit for being offbeat can only do so much to redeem a neither-fish-nor-fowl bore like “After the Dark,” whose exploitable elements go tastefully unexploited while its gestures toward profundity turn out to be playing air guitar. This what-if fantasy, starring James D’Arcy as a philosophy instructor challenging young minds with successive doomsday scenarios, is talky, tedious and carelessly implausible even by its own rulebook. The result feels like several discarded script ideas for “Lost” episodes, recast with young hotties and produced in Indonesia for tax purposes; genre fans lured in by the promise of sci-fi suspense are going to be very annoyed on the way out. Opened in Stateside theaters last week simultaneously with its VOD launch, writer-director John Huddles’ feature will look to make whatever coin it can in home formats.

Mr. Zimit (D’Arcy) is teaching the last class of the semester to graduating seniors at an international high school in Jakarta. He proposes they conduct a “thought experiment” to test their mastery of logic — no matter that this particular exercise would seem more apt around a campfire on an Outward Bound weekend than in any kind of philosophy course. (The film was titled “The Philosophers” during what appears to have been a long period on the shelf, and in some prior festival/foreign release showings.)

The game’s premise: Atomic apocalypse is an immediate certainty. On an imaginary field trip to the ninth-century Prambanan Temple complex, the 21 kids and instructor have only minutes to decide who merits saving in a conveniently nearby luxury survival bunker equipped to sustain only 10 lives for a year. The rest will shortly be toast. Each has randomly picked a card describing his or her fictitious vocation — from carpenter, doctor and organic farmer (all plusses when re-building civilization) to “published poet.” The latter is shot dead mid-sentence by Mr. Zimit … pretend-shot, of course. (But why is the teacher carrying a loaded revolver in the first place? Oh, never mind.)

Indeed, what renders these hypothetical situations pointless is that as a self-appointed “wild card” with mystery skills, D’Arcy’s character always seems able to destroy everyone’s future, no matter what collective decisions they make. It’s like a bratty child repeatedly yelling, “I win because of invisible superpowers I just made up!” during group play. Beyond being petulant, silly, and non-educational, his classroom behavior is about as professionally credible as that of movie psychoanalysts who are forever sleeping with (or murdering) their clients — a comparison all too apt by the soap-operatic fadeout here.

This interfering factor gets more objectionable when the same scenario is replayed with fresh changes that render sexual preferences and fertility status a major issue. Then there’s a third go-round in which, due to the collective outcry at his dubious tactics, Mr. Zimit lets the teacher’s pet, duly named Petra (Sophie Lowe), choose the bunker inhabitants by herself. This allows the final fantasy iteration to leave thrill-free terrain for something cloyingly precious.

Remaining immaculately groomed through every cataclysm, the youthful thesps are merely required to be earnest, and can treat “After the Dark” as a useful resume builder. The exception is Lowe (“Beautiful Kate”), who began her public life as a model and, if this were her last project, would end it as one, too. D’Arcy manages to maintain some dignity under the circumstances, until late in the game he is required to appear looking like a caveman right out of those Geico ads. Adios, last shred of dignity.

For a professed “think piece,” “After the Dark” is often remarkably lightheaded. Time and again its hypothetical scenarios hinge on information that the students, detailing aloud their fantasy futures, could only glean were they watching the same turgid dramatizations we are. Unfortunately this arbitrary logic never becomes fun, even unintentionally so — everything here is treated with a ponderous gravity that fails to impart actual depth.

Even the fairly handsome packaging doesn’t help much, since aside from nuclear mushroom clouds and a few other visual effects, the yakkety material might’ve worked just as well (i.e., not very) as a stage play. Nonetheless, John Radel’s widescreen lensing reps the most diverting element in a polished if empty package.

Film Review: 'After the Dark'

Reviewed online, Santa Barbara, Feb. 4, 2014. MPAA Rating: R. Running time: 107 MIN.


(U.S.-Indonesia) A Phase 4 Films release of an Olive Branch presentation in association with PT Surya Citra Televisi. Produced by George Zakk, Cybill Lui.


Directed, written by John Huddles. Camera (color, widescreen, HD), John Radel; editor, William Yeh; music, Nicholas O'Toole, Jonathan Davis; production designer, David Ingram; costume designer, Shani Hyde; sound, Mark Cornish, Andrew Timlin; supervising sound editor/sound designer, Paula Fairfield; re-recording mixers, Gary Coppola, Stanley Johnston; visual effects supervisors, John Attard, Adam Howarth; assistant director, Andrew Howard.


James D'Arcy, Sophie Lowe, Daryl Sabara, Freddie Stroma, Rhys Wakefield, Bonnie Wright, Jacob Artist, George Blagden, Philippa Coulthard, Katie Findlay, Natasha Gott, Taser Hassan, Chanelle Bianca Ho, Darius Homayoun, Cinta Laura Kiel, Melissa Le-Vu, Maia Mitchell, Erin Moriarty, Toby Sebastian, Abhi Sinha, Hope Olaide Wilson. (English dialogue)

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Jeppe says:

    I think you fail to comprehend what this is really about..

  2. thriftyjim says:

    This movie made me wanna young people really have these ideas,or is it just hollywood.

  3. Luka Magnotta says:

    The international school is not believable. The classroom looks so fake. I know from firsthand experience because I lived in Jakarta and went to the American International School JIS. Looks more like a classroom in Bali. Silly set designers!

    • sixtine says:

      This was not the purpose of the film… your comment has no interest.
      The film was good in my opinion.
      The 18-year-old students do not all react like this, but the goal of the film was to show the various possible inter-actions to save humanity in the event of global conflict.
      The only thing I did not like was that the fallout radiocatives take much longer than a year to subside and it is therefore difficult for the human being, to return to live outside the bunker after a year.

      The film deserved a better audience and a better score than the 2/10 of Denis Harvey.
      This journalist didn’t understand the film and does not deserve the name of film specialist.

More Film News from Variety