Cannes Film Review: ‘The Kindergarten Teacher’

The Kindergarten Teacher Review

Nadav Lapid's follow-up to 'Policeman' is a precisely lensed, cool-headed denunciation of crass contempo life and its inability to value the poetic.

Opinions will be sharply divided on Nadav Lapid’s “The Kindergarten Teacher,” a mannered story about the titular character and her obsession with a 5-year-old, poetry-spouting wunderkind. Precisely lensed in an intriguing style that often makes the camera an additional protag, the pic is more artificial than the helmer’s debut, “Policeman,” and has a much narrower focus, being a cool-headed denunciation of crass contempo life and its inability to value the poetic. Always engrossing but also perplexing and offering little deeper than the obvious, “Teacher” still reps a new development in a striking, idiosyncratic director and will see strong fest rotation.

Just from the opening frames, audiences will know they should be paying attention to what, and how, the camera sees: For several minutes, Nira (Sarit Larry) doesn’t come into full frame if her husband (Lior Raz) is also in the scene. Instead, while he’s watching a loud, inane TV show, her head is conspicuously out of view; apart from sexual compatibility, there’s little to bring these two together. Once Nira’s in her kindergarten classroom, the camera takes on a p.o.v. role or observes from a position so close to her body as to be practically a second head, roaming about the space and scanning her pupils.

Yoav (Avi Shnaidman), one of her charges, spontaneously invents poems which he dictates to nanny Miri (Ester Rada). Obviously it’s unusual for a 5-year-old, but more striking are the sophisticated words and elliptical meanings, which, Nira remarks, are the compositions of someone “who’s seen much beauty.” Yoav’s short biography doesn’t fit that statement: His mother ran off with a lover and his father, Amnon (Yehezkel Lazarov), is a hotshot restaurateur with little time for his son. The kid’s exposure to poetry came through an uncle (Dan Toren) who is now less involved in the child’s life.

Nira is utterly taken by this prodigy and decides his talent must be nurtured. While other pupils are napping, she gets him up and teaches him concepts: evil by crushing an ant for no reason, violence by slapping herself, pain by pinching her skin. In the adult poetry class she attends, she reads one of Yoav’s compositions, claiming it as her own; her appropriation isn’t very different from that of Miri, who uses the poems during acting auditions, but Nira isn’t willing to share this boy wonder with someone only superficially appreciative, and she gets the nanny fired by telling Amnon that Miri is using his son’s verses.

The fascination with Yoav becomes an obsession, with Nira determined to protect his primal talent before the passage from boyhood to adolescence changes his purity. She meets with Amnon, but his interest lies in money and its trappings, leaving no room for poetry. More appreciative is her own teacher Oded (Hamuchtar), still believing Nira is the author of the verses and praising her for shedding her initial banality (such compliments also help him seduce his pupil, calling into question any genuine depth he superficially projects). Having confirmed Yoav’s talent, she’s ready to push him forward as the author, but to ensure his continued innocence, she’ll have to protect the child from modern society’s crass bulldozing of mystery and beauty.

The world no longer appreciates grace and individuality: Is that really all there is to the message behind “The Kindergarten Teacher”? After the far tougher implications of “Policeman,” one looks in vain for deeper meaning in Lapid’s follow-up: After all, every distinctive camera movement, every artificial gaze seems to be pregnant with meaning, signaling subtext. Yoav’s first poem, about a woman named Hagar, challenges auds to question whether using the name Hagar, the biblical mother of all Arabs, means Lapid is commenting on Israeli politics. But no: There are no hidden allusions, only the generically valid point that we’ve strangled our souls on the altar of Mammon. Wait  doesn’t that idea come from the Bible, too?

Once it’s clear there’s nothing else going on underneath the straightforward story (aside from casual references to the Ashkenazi-Sephardic divide), Lapid’s stylizations become intriguing exercises rather than signifiers of meaning. Nira’s otherworldly qualities  she has a “normal” family life with husband and two kids, yet walks through everything as if in a vacuum of concentration  will fascinate some and annoy others. Actress Larry uses her pale blue eyes to convey a sense of seeking more than what can be seen, though the script makes her merely a collection of traits (disturbing ones at that) rather than an integrated person. This lack of wholeness may be exactly Lapid’s point, since the conformity of home life stands apart from her obsession with Yoav, but there remains something missing that would make it all meaningful.

The striking character of Miri, the nanny/actress who exudes confidence in her long-legged beauty, gets lost just when it seems she’s about to develop (this through no fault of Rada, a singer with terrific screen presence). Young Shnaidman is an exceptional performer  at his age, it’s impossible to know how much is performance and how much reality  playing an odd child who’s boisterous with peers and quiet with adults, projecting an unreadable air of distraction. Lapid admits to an autobiographical element in the film, since the poems are his own compositions from when he was Yoav’s age; while they’re exceptional verses from a child that young, they’re not quite the mature wonders the characters claim.

The helmer’s repeat collaboration with d.p. Shai Goldman yields the pic’s greatest rewards thanks to the searching camera’s manner of calling attention to itself. Intense closeups make the figures even more inscrutable as well as haunting, bringing audiences into the performers’ space and forcing us to constantly question what we’re seeing, and how. The answers, however, aren’t nearly as satisfying as the visuals.

Cannes Film Review: 'The Kindergarten Teacher'

Reviewed at Cannes Film Festival (Critics’ Week), May 19, 2014. Running time: 119 MIN. (Original title: “Haganenet”)

Production

(Israel-France) An Haut et Court Distribution (in France) release of a Pie Films, Haut et Court, Arte France Cinema production, with the participation of Arte France, the Leon Recanati Foundation, Aide aux Cinemas du Monde, Centre National du Cinema et de l’Image Animee, Ministere des Affaires Etrangeres et du Developpement Intl., Institut Francais, the Jerusalem Film Lab, Mifal Hapais. (International sales: Le Pacte, Paris.) Produced by Talia Kleinhendler, Osnat Handelsman-Keren, Carole Scotta.

Crew

Directed, written by Nadav Lapid. Camera (color), Shai Goldman; editor, Era Lapid; production designer, Miguel Merkin; costume designer, Doron Ashkenazi; sound, Aviv Aldema, Marina Kertez, Bruno Mercere; associate producers, Simon Arnal, Caroline Benjo; line producer, Julie Billy; assistant directors, Avi Satat, Michal Ben Gad; casting, Orit Azulay, Ilan Gazit, Yehuda Bello, Limor Shmila.

With

Sarit Larry, Avi Shnaidman, Lior Raz, Hamuchtar, Ester Rada, Guy Oren, Yehezkel Lazarov, Dan Toren, Avishag Kahalani. (Hebrew dialogue)

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. ajaxthree says:

    I have many emotions and thoughts about this movie. On one hand I loved it. On another hand… I did not like the fact, that there is not a solution offered… let me explain… production companies should be providing links in the credits to groups and organizations to help society deal with issues such as these. Not everybody perceives this but this material world is not real… we are truly in a make believe world an illusion… where we all are the writers, directors and producers of our own “personal” movies. Bank of America Analyst put forth that there is a up to a 50% chance we live in a matrix. Some are actually in the movie making business. Science says that time does not really exist. On one hand it does… but humanity learned how to tell time by what it learned from nature. Nature is attempting to tell humanity that we are all one big family. So who is the real bad guys here… is it the the visionary aka the kindergarten teacher, who saw raw talent in this old soul that was sentenced to this 5 year old BOdY… or is it the system… the father was not interested in his son future… I am not advocating kidnapping… maybe this story needs a sequel when the boy grows up. If one know Torah, they can see parallels. I hope this production company will maybe expand their social responsibility to society by developing social awareness. I am really tired of watching movies that are in the business of telling a story and not offering soultions. Maybe there is some I have missed and there is such a thing going on… more and more people are seeing themselves and others in the movie plots and not sure how to deal with the situation they are facing in real life… that isn’t so real, but it sure seems like it.

More Film News from Variety

Loading