Peter Jackson on the End of His Middle Earth Odyssey

Peter Jackson The Hobbit
Julian Broad for Variety

The Dec. 17 debut of “The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies” marks both an end and a beginning for Peter Jackson.

It represents the culmination of his 16-year, six-film J.R.R. Tolkien marathon — an outsized success in duration, execution, visual-effects wizardry and overall popularity. No director in history has maintained tighter control over the creative direction of a global film franchise, which so far has amassed close to $5 billion in ticket sales alone.

But after bringing his Middle-earth spectacles to the masses, the world’s most famous Kiwi is ready to downsize and return to his low-budget roots: The 53-year-old director-producer-screenwriter is working on adapting several true stories about his native country, with his longtime partner Fran Walsh, that he says will be similar in tone and scope to his 1994 murder tale, “Heavenly Creatures.”

“We really feel a bigger urge now to not continue with another Hollywood blockbuster for a while, but to go back and tell some New Zealand stories,” Jackson told Variety in an interview just hours before the London premiere of his final “Hobbit” installment last week.

He’s also toying with virtual reality, and studying entertainment opportunities in the emerging technology that has primarily been used to help e-tailers provide 3D ad-friendly versions of cars and couches to consumers.

Julian Broad for Variety

“We’re right on the cusp of a major upheaval of the entertainment world once that technology really kicks in,” he says. Jackson will devote a year or two on the project, but he’s not sure if the best fit will be for films or videogames.

The filmmaker also continues to tinker with the bigscreen experience, such as his embrace of higher frame rates. When the first “Hobbit” film debuted in 2012, some critics said that at 48 frames per second, the images looked like something out of TV soap operas. So Jackson improved the grading and color-timing of the subsequent pictures, and the furor died down.

Both the frame-rate experiment and the polarizing reaction raise larger questions about the future of the film business.

“Films 100 years ago were 16 frames per second, no sound, no color,” Jackson says. “So if you look 100 years ahead, I don’t know what films will be, but I can guarantee they won’t be 24 frames per second and 2D. The audience is falling away, and you have to compete with all the other forms of entertainment. So to get people into the cinema, we need to experiment to survive.”

The studios are interested in whatever road Jackson takes.

“All of us at New Line and Warners would like to continue being in business with Peter — and plan to,” says New Line president Toby Emmerich.

Carolyn Blackwood, senior exec VP of strategy and operations for New Line (and an exec producer of the “Hobbit” movies) adds that Jackson can pretty much write his own ticket. “No question we consider Peter part of our family. But there’s no ‘when is the next one, when is the next one?’ That’s not how he works best.”

Their commitment is understandable. The five Tolkien films accumulated $4.8 billion at the worldwide box office and spawned merchandise, DVDs and ancillary sales ranging from international TV to Legos worth, conservatively, an estimated $500 million, including sale of the first trilogy in 2002 to Turner/TBS/the WB for $150 million for 10 years of showings. The mobile videogame “The Hobbit: Kingdoms of Middle-earth” has grossed more than $100 millon since its November 2012 release.

As he prepares to walk the red carpet for the London premiere, Jackson sounds sleep deprived. The filmmaker had been working 36 hours straight to add finishing touches to the film that concludes the “Hobbit” trilogy.

He’s proud of the movie, and notes that it has a different tone than its predecessors. “I wanted to give it the pace of a thriller,” says the filmmaker. “I wanted to make it sharp and fast rather than the epic-quest type pace.”

It also benefits from a higher body count. “I know it’s a primitive thing to say, but you can get so much more emotional power when you have a main cast member with a death scene,” he says.

The sprawling shoot, which encompassed 266 days of principal photography and 10 weeks of pickups, ended on a particularly bittersweet note for Jackson and his collaborators.

”We’ve got a big cast, so these farewells would come upon us fairly regularly,” he says. “The hardest ones were the guys who had been around for so long.”

None was harder than that of Ian McKellen, whose final shooting scene as the wizard Gandalf consisted of a quiet moment where he sits with Martin Freeman’s Bilbo after a massive battle. The emotion of the moment inspired Jackson to cut the dialogue at the last minute so as to let the actors’ reactions speak for themselves.

“Just to say to Ian — you’re never ever going to put this beard on again, you’re never ever going to wear the robes and the hat,” recalls Jackson. “I did find that pretty tough.”

For McKellen, the sense of finality was leavened with deja vu. “It was emotional, but I’ve been saying goodbye to Gandalf since the year 2000, and I keep getting called back,” he jokes.

Aside from being a technological innovator and renowned director, Jackson has another claim to fame: No other filmmaker has single-handedly boosted a country’s economy.

According to the New Zealand tourism board, international arrivals to Wellington jumped 87% in the 12 years since the first “Lord of the Rings”; the Hobbiton movie set, on NZ’s North Island, has attracted 700,000 visitors since opening in 2003, with 250,000 of those in the past year.

Since the first “Lord of the Rings” began pre-production in 1998, Jackson has helped the local economy — and Kiwi filmmakers — by building five companies, including Weta Digital, outside Wellington, which collectively employ approximately 1,000 people year-round (though more than 4,000 were needed for the three “Hobbit” films).

Aside from Jackson’s films, including “The Adventures of Tintin,” which he produced and Steven Spielberg directed, they have handled complex projects like “Avatar” and mini-budget local pictures, and serve one of Jackson’s avowed goals: to increase production in New Zealand.

Jackson was at the center of the country’s tax breaks for filmmakers, which now offer a rebate of up to 20%, and his team is working with the New Zealand Film Commission to find fresh ways to bolster production. The members of the Wellington team are affectionate toward their boss and protective of his privacy. Even the location of his office is kept confidential. Many of the key workers today were there when the companies started up. “It’s a passionate group of people coming together to tell a single person’s story, not to make a business deal,” says design house Weta Workshop’s Richard Taylor.

Park Road Post’s Cameron Harland, general manager at another one of the five Wellington-area firms, credits Jackson’s overall vision for the ventures’ success. “One commonality is Peter — and he’s a filmmaker. That’s important. It’s not about an accountant making decisions.”

For a game-changing moviemaker, Jackson is low-key and private, choosing to live in the same house as he did in the 1980s. His usual attire — pants cut off below the knees, an untucked shirt and bare feet — reflects his down-to-earth personna.

“He personifies the New Zealand culture: humble, friendly and full of can-do ingenuity,” says Mark Ordesky, co-topper of the multimedia company Court Five, who oversaw production of the three “Lord of the Rings” movies when he was an executive at New Line.

Jackson and Walsh, who’ve been together since 1987, and have a son and a daughter, are very protective of their family’s privacy. Walsh doesn’t like to be photographed, and declined to appear on any DVD extra for the previous Tolkien films.

Born in Wellington and raised in the nearby coastal town of Pukerua Bay, Jackson was the only child of immigrant parents from England. His mother was a factory worker and later, housewife; his father a payroll clerk. Jackson grew up a film fan, and as a young boy learned about editing, special effects and makeup by experimenting on his own by making shorts on the family’s Super 8 camera. He attempted to remake “King Kong” — his favorite movie — using stop-motion models. He also shot a World War II drama called “The Dwarf Patrol,” producing his first special effects by poking pinholes in the film stock to approximate gunshots.

At 16, Jackson dropped out of school, and for seven years worked as a photo engraver for the local newspaper. Two years in, he bought himself a 16mm camera and began shooting a film that later became his first feature, 1987’s “Bad Taste,” a science fiction horror comedy about hungry alien invaders.

While Jackson is warm to reporters, the press is not a priority. This is one of the few interviews he’s giving on behalf of “The Hobbit,” and Variety’s visit to Wellington was one of the rare times a major publication has been allowed into his lair.

Jackson would rather directly interact with his fans. He interrupted post-production work on “Hobbit” in late July to fly to Comic-Con in San Diego, where he headed a panel discussion. Afterward, he spoke with those in the audience until he had to be dragged away by his handlers.

“He knows who his fans are and how to reach them,” Blackwood says. “He is very reverential of their needs.”

Jackson is hands-on, and has a keen eye for detail, according to Blackwood. He makes decisions as both a fan and filmmaker. “He has huge technical skills, but he’s also a creative artist,” she says. “Those things are not mutually exclusive.”

Actors who work with Jackson say he is a quiet but authoritative presence on set. He likes to make changes on the fly and has been known to act out scenes in order to demonstrate what he wants.

“There are times when so much existed in his head that he would need to articulate physically what he saw, so he’d embody a hobbit or a different character,” says Elijah Wood, who played Frodo in the “The Lord of the Rings” movies. “It was always helpful and incredibly charming, and it gave us a laugh.”

Richard Armitage, the dwarf leader Thorin Oakenshield in “The Hobbit,” notes that discussions about character tended to occur during production rather than before it. “When I wanted to talk, he was open to it,” Armitage says. “He prefers to have conversations as we’re filming, and to make tweaks and adjustments in a way that feels organic.”

Melanie Lynskey made her feature film debut at 16 in “Heavenly Creatures,” and says Jackson assumed a paternal role while guiding her through the psychological terrain that her character in that true-life murder mystery required.

“Peter made sure I could go to emotional places without losing my mind,” she says. “I always felt protected and supported. At the end of each scene, we had a process where I’d check in, and he’d make sure I was feeling OK.”

Jackson says he likes to have fun on sets, and at the same time establish a tone of tranquility. “I think that if I’m calm, everyone else has got to be calm,” he explains.

When he leapt from microbudget to megascale films, Jackson never seemed flustered by the pressure, Ordesky says. If studio or international executives got nervous, Jackson would repeat his mantra: “One job at a time, every job a success.”

His early films, splatter comedies like “Bad Taste,” “Meet the Feebles” and “Dead Alive,” offer no clues that the director would be able to tackle Tolkien, whose work he discovered as a young adult.

In 1998, Jackson came to New Line to pitch the idea of simultaneously filming two “Lord of the Rings” movies. Ordesky, then-president of the studio’s specialty division, Fine Line, had been a fan of “Bad Taste.” Jackson gave a verbal presentation for “LOTR” followed by a 30-minute video showing how technology had advanced enough to create huge army battles, a digital lead character like Gollum, and convincingly show a 6-foot-tall actor next to a small Hobbit.

New Line’s then-chairman and CEO Bob Shaye was so impressed that he proposed three films instead of two, and the company made a series of deals with overseas distributors to fund the trilogy. Jackson brought his tech savvy to the productions, and his ingenuity for making a budget look bigger. Actor Elijah Wood joked at the time that they were making “the biggest-budget indie film of all time.”

McKellen remembers shooting the movies in an old paint factory that had been converted into a studio, with no sound-proofing and no heat. “It was either very cold or noisy,” McKellen recalls. “And it was 10 minutes from where Peter and Fran live; it felt like making a home movie.”

The “Hobbit” trilogy — which cost $700 million to make (as opposed to just over $300 million for “LOTR”) — presented fresh complexities. The original plan was for Jackson to produce two movies, with Guillermo del Toro directing. But del Toro exited in 2010 when legal negotiations kept delaying a production start. “It was a big maze to navigate,” says New Line’s Blackwood. (Del Toro did not respond to a request for an interview.)

Multiple parties had, or have, a stake in the movies, including MGM (which was going through a financial crisis that eventually led to its bankruptcy), the late producer Saul Zaentz and Bob and Harvey Weinstein. As complex as that seems, it’s really a simplified version of the web of intrigue that delayed production on “The Hobbit” trilogy. (Go to Variety.com for Ted Johnson’s story on the trilogy’s legal tangles.)

When del Toro left, Jackson was wary of returning to the world of orcs, dragons and dwarfs, but it became clear he was best positioned to assume the reins.

“He felt it was important that the movies get made,” says Ken Kamins, Jackson’s longtime manager. “He felt a responsibility to New Line and Warner Bros. and to the crew and team in New Zealand.”

Jackson acknowledges the reluctance he felt originally, fearing he might be repeating himself. But, he discovered his concerns were unwarranted. “The scenes were different, the pages were different. I was able to find fresh things.”

The filmmaker says his confidence has increased with each “Hobbit” film, an attitude duly noted by Orlando Bloom, who plays the elf warrior Legolas in five of the movies. In fact, he says, Jackson appeared to be more laid back on the “Hobbit” films than he was while making the earlier trilogy.

“He was really enjoying it,” Bloom notes. “There was a lot of pressure on him during ‘Lord of the Rings’ and a lot of treading water. … He seemed more at ease during ‘The Hobbit,’ knowing that he had more power, and that there was more faith in him.”

While critical reaction to the new installment has been largely positive, it was more mixed on the first two. Oscar voters also have cooled to Jackson, after handing “The Return of the King” 11 statues in 2003, including best picture, director and adapted screenplay.

“I feel lucky to have the Oscars I got, so I don’t live in the hopes of getting more,” Jackson laughs. He wouldn’t mind, however, if the new film gets awards attention for the actors — and particularly the below-the-line crew.

“Their work has advanced in the 10 years (since ‘LOTR’),” says Jackson. “And hopefully with the third film, people will see more of the technical side.”

Jackson himself has his hands full with his fresh focus on New Zealand, overseeing his Wellington companies and mentoring local filmmakers.

Nevertheless, with all this going on, there remains the lingering question of whether the final chapter on Tolkien has been filmed. There’s a lot more material, including short stories, but they are tightly controlled by the Tolkien estate, which isn’t keen on more movies.

But what if things change, and the Tolkien properties become available for future filming. Would Jackson be interested?

“If I had to start tomorrow, I would say no, because I definitely would appreciate a break to clear my head and get my little New Zealand stories done, which is where my passion and my heart is heading now,” the director says. “But ask me in two or three years, and I’d probably say yes. It would be hard to see another filmmaker go into this world, because I certainly have an emotional ownership of it.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 35

Leave a Reply

35 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. gostaria de nova trilogia dos hobitts por favor

  2. md.Aslam Ansari says:

    I love you peter Jackson movei

  3. Shafbaby says:

    I was really looking forward to a LOTR movie over the first age with Melkor, Ungoliant, Ancalagon, etc.

  4. tread says:

    yeah but there needs to be another movie about how it all began …..we know sauron was defeated in some long ago battle and that he forged a ring in secret , we need a move to bring all these loose ends to completion

    • TheLoTRfan says:

      You do realize, that Jackson won’t be making any more Lord of The Rings or The Hobbit movies, right? He won’t because of legal reasons. But it is quite sad that we will not see anymore Lord of The Rings and The Hobbit movies. There probably will be games about Middle-Earth and themed after The Lord of The Rings, but the movies are much better than any games. We don’t have to worry if we can run them, we don’t need to worry about anything, just sit down and enjoy the movie. Although, all things come an end. And LoTR movies’ end came early. Oh well.

  5. sue says:

    need another hobbit movie to explain what happened to Tauriel after Kili died. Did the elf lord get his jewels from the mountain? Whatever became of the Arkenstone? How did Saruman get corrupted and where Gimli came in since his people were suppose to be dead shouldn’t he have been dead with them?. Would have liked to see more for the man/bear in action and have Kili resurrected.

  6. The way I’m trying to look at it right now is like this – the book is the book, and the movie is the movie. They’re two different things, and not even really comparable, although when I compare the two, its frustrating. I tend to hate adaptations of books, and especially certain comic books (the ones where I like the story usually), into movies, because they usually use a lot of CG (which is getting better, but still adds a certain level of ridiculousness) and just molest the storyline so badly that it comes across nothing like the book at all. I could name numerous examples, but I won’t bother.

    With Lord of the Rings, I basically give the book a read once every 5 or 10 years and it is obviously its own entity, with its own rhythm and all that. Peter Jackson, while obviously a super-fan, simply wasn’t able to capture some of what Tolkien was able to evoke in his books, but I’m trying keep in mind that this is, of course, impossible. That said, I do love the LOTR movies and even The Hobbit is pretty cool in a lot of ways. I have my nitpicks, but who doesn’t? Overall I’m glad Peter Jackson got all of these movies done, and I look forward to watching some massive box set with 12 hours of extras at some point, like they did with LOTR. I think overall, it manages to be more enjoyable as a six-parter than the whole Star Wars debacle, of which half I find utterly unwatchable.

    Anyway, what I wanted to really say was this: Its too bad the Tolkien estate isn’t really down with having any more Middle Earth saga be explored. At this point, if they’ve let him do what he’s already done, I don’t see the point in further “selling out”, since The Hobbit is clearly not meant to represent the tone or length of the book whatsoever, with Legolas running around and all that, and just a shitload of stuff thrown in to fill it all out. Its clearly done in a more prequel style to LOTR, so the two trilogies can be watched in an epic Sunday afternoon marathon from morning til night. Its not for original fans of the book – most of whom are old and may die from over stimulation at the theater, or they’re dead already anyways.. that book is old! – its just one of those crazy blockbusters that is loosely based on the book. But its done fairly lovingly, so we should give the guy a break. So he likes to make everything CG, so what? It often looks pretty cool. This isn’t a total shitstorm like Star Wars 1-3.

    So my point is, the Tolkien estate should just give him the full rights to make whatever Middle Earth movies he wants. I mean, why not? So he makes a NEW series of movies based in Middle Earth…is this bad? At least there’s no source book for fanboys to whine about and give him a hard time for fucking up small details. The other thing is, it might actually be GOOD. Can you imagine? A whole new Middle Earth trilogy just based on a well-written script, overseen by a guy who has proven that he loves the series, knows the general tone, and probably won’t pull a George Lucas and make a huge mess out of everything. Maybe the whole problem all along is that he’s been working with source material from books that are really hard to make into movies. I thought the whole point of making movies was its about your imagination, and seeing what you can do. If they just give him free reign to come up with a whole new saga, sure, all these geeks would be sitting there with their arms crossed, ready to complain. But EVERYONE would go see it, just to see what happens. Because no one would know! haha. :) What do you guys think? Can you imagine – a NEW trilogy? For example, how many cartoons and movies can you think of that are born out of a franchise, but don’t copy specific issues of books or whatever? Half the time, they just own the rights and make it up. Anyway, I think Chris Tolkien should just say “ok, fine, you can use Legolas and Frodo and all those guys if you want… its just a movie anyway”. :) Its not like the Tolkien estate would be giving Peter Jackson the right to edit and revise the actual books. Now that WOULD be crazy.

    But if they gave him the right to the movie stuff, it would be good because then we won’t get a LOTR reboot in ten years by some fucking asshole who doesn’t give a shit about it, and just wants to make money ( Transformers).. Peter Jackson is like a guy who loves some kid so much he wants to adopt that kid, but the kid lives on some rich estate and basically can only go on outings with him. He always has to drive back to the mansion and say goodbye. Just let him adopt the kid for Christ sakes! :)

  7. Jason says:

    I hope they do decide to return to middle earth as I believe the story isn’t really finished

  8. film izle says:

    It truly is perfect time and energy to earn some ideas money for hard times and it’s time for it to feel very special. I have got find out this text of course, if I could merely I wish to propose an individual few attention-grabbing items and also strategies. You may can compose subsequent articles in regards to this write-up. I would like to read through far more problems over it!

  9. Joe says:

    I find this very acceptable, but, I would like to see a new LOTRO, updated to modern standards, and plus, there are more stories that can be told, like the stories of the elves, or the stories of the arkenstone (Which I don’t believe was the kings jewel at first) and I would love to see one of these things come to life through the brain and ideals of Peter Jackson, but however, just like Bilbo Baggins, an adventurer like Peter Jackson, just needs to go home and relax for a bit, and stare at his ring and enjoy it.

  10. rey says:

    I am very disapointed and angry about Peter Jackson. All fans of Tintin have waited for The next Tintin movie that was supposed to be direkted by Jackson after The Hobbit films. I think that Peter was going to make The 2. Tintin film after his latest films. But he is not going to make it. He wants to make another film instead. I think he is lying? Maybe The Hobbit films were a escusion for not making the next Tintin film. I dont trust this man any longer. I dont like him anymore.

  11. Scott says:

    I’ve been looking all over for this issue of Variety and can’t find it anywhere.

  12. I was deeply disturbed to read in another interview that PJ wants to shoe-horn Tauriel into LOTR movies Lucas style. It was even more disturbing that Philippa Boyens said that first and PJ agreed like an automaton. Hobbit trilogy, as well as King Kong and Love Bones, have terrible scripts and Boyens influence on them is way too obvious. They read like a bad fanfiction, there’s mistaking exposition for character development and tons of unnecessary padding that goes nowhere (said Tauriel and her romance are examples of dead end character/subplot). Look no further for reasons why PJ has become irrelevant as far as awards go while his new Middle earth trilogy ended up with passable critical reception. Going from LOTR’s 91% 96 % and 95% fresh to Hobbit’s 64% 74% and 60% is a gigantic nose-dive.

  13. CARMINE tAFFURI says:

    Is it truely the end for Middle earth? After the battle, Thranduil tells Legolas to got to the North country and seek out the Ranger, known as Strider. He we know is the rightful king of Gondor, and the center of the Return of The King. So have we really seen a new door open for a redux of Lord of The Rings, or perhaps a new version of at least Return?

  14. Magic_Al says:

    “No director in history has maintained tighter control over the creative direction of a global film franchise.” Except, of course, George Lucas. He created Star Wars, and those two films of the six (pre-Disney) that he didn’t direct he self-financed, wrote the stories for, and closely supervised as though he was the show runner of a TV series. Star Wars was all his, no need to wish some heirs would hand over rights to the rest of the story.

  15. pmoore1956 says:

    Hope someone will make movies out of the Silmarillion and the other Tolkien writings, if not by Peter Jackson as director, I hope at least as producer. I am thankful for the wonderful work of Peter Jackson.

  16. Sarah Dalton says:

    Peter Jackson – Live long and prosper! You deserve every accolade I can think of for your passionate work on these wonderful stories. Thank you so much for your efforts to bring Tolkien’s work to life. I hope you have good memories about the excellence of your work and that you succeed in everything else you do. Thanks to all the actors and similar wishes to them for their efforts.

  17. Julien says:

    Or the Hyperion Saga from Dan Simmons :)

  18. Ian says:

    How about doing Bioshock or Gears of War Mr. Jackson??

  19. Alycia says:

    I would love to see Peter Jackson do the Dragon Rider’s of Pern. I think he would truly bring those books to life.

  20. Sue Barner says:

    Fortunately for those such as Mando Pando, anyone who is not a fan of Peter Jackson’s work doesn’t have to see any of Peter Jackson’s work. They can leave it to the rest of us (and there are one or two of us out there, judging by the box office results) to pay our money and take our trips to Middle Earth, etc. We’re more than happy to watch these films over and over again!

  21. Mando Pando says:

    -_- the hobbit film series is really bad. I mean those special effects made the film worse. Why not use those stunt actors from the last three films…looked much more realistic to everybody watching the freakin movie. -_- and what’s with the love affair between the elf and the dwarf? whose idea was that, why are they still working for MGM. Even the dwarves look animated in some way, not like Gimili at all.

    3 movies? really the book is only 200 pages. And what up with legolas? another thing about those movies that is really odd, and that whole Lake Town scene was like watching some Disney version of Lord of the rings. -_- thank you peter jackson, i thought only George Lucas lost his mind

  22. Uncle Robot says:

    Thank god del Toro left – he made the first Hobbit a disaster

  23. tlsnyder42 says:

    I LOVED the original 48 frames. It looked fantastic! Most of the critics of it were critics I don’t pay attention to on ANY other reviews, so I reject whatever they had to say. Jackson should return to his original vision for it. It was better than the muddy second version I saw for the second HOBBIT movie. It wasn’t the same. Bring back bright Technicolor too. Today’s “realism” with toned down colors is boring. Just compare today’s adventure movies to something like THE ADVENTURES OF ROBIN HOOD with Errol Flynn or THE WIZARD OF OZ and maybe you’ll agree with me. Movies should be fun AND beautiful to look at!!! What’s wrong with that? I don’t get the obsessive modern fascination with all “realism” all the time.

  24. Kayleigh says:

    I saw “The Battle of the Five Armies” last night. They were showing a marathon of all three films, so those who paid to see all three were allowed to see the new installment a few days before everyone else. It was pretty good. My husband thought it was the best of the three and I’m inclined to agree. I really loved the first film, the second was mediocre, in my opinion. Too much was changed from the book. The third gets right into the action with the slaying of Smaug and from there, the battle lines are drawn. The battle sequences looked great, especially in 48 fps. I really hope the high frame rate catches on because it really immerses you in the film. You feel like you’re right there, especially if you see it on a large screen (like IMAX or XD). I actually got a little teary-eyed at the end, which I didn’t expect. I think Martin Freeman did a much better job in the final movie than the second. The battle was the obviously the focus and it didn’t disappoint. The scale of the battle definitely came through on-screen. I even wish that it were a little longer. I wanted a bit more, but all-in-all I was satisfied. The end was cute, as it is a lead-in to a very familiar scene for fans of LOTR. I definitely recommend the third film for fans of Jackson’s adaptations.

    • Kayleigh says:

      He can’t. The Tolkien family owns the rights to it. United Artists got the rights to “The Hobbit” and “LOTR” back in the seventies (or around then), but that’s it. That’s how Peter Jackson was able to do the movies. Christopher Tolkien actually hates Jackson’s adaptations. So, he’s not likely to relinquish the rights to him, which means no “Unfinished Tales” or “Silmarillion”. I always found that a large piece of the mythology was missing from LOTR because he couldn’t include anything from Silmarillion. For instance, they can never explain who Illuvatar is or the Ainur or Maia. Those who watch the films, but don’t read all of Tolkien’s works will never know WHO and WHAT exactly Morgoth and Sauron were. They’ll never understand what a Dunedain or a Numenorean are. While PJ kind of butchered “The Hobbit”, I think he stayed relatively faithful the LOTR. It would have been made even better if he could have incorporated more of Tolkien’s Middle Earth mythology/theology.

  25. Deepak C. says:

    So if he really is moving onto smaller, New Zealand-set films, does that mean he’s no longer directing the Tintin sequel?

    • I wondered that too, and as to whether Temeraire is still going to become a TV series (it wasn’t like he was going to direct the pilot, but it’d be nice). But he may not make any of these films, it took him ages to make The Lovely Bones and part of that was probably the long nap he must have had after LOTR and King Kong.

  26. Remarkable body of work for Jackson, though I still count his “Bad Taste” among my favorites – especially the scene with the seagull…

More Film News from Variety

Loading