Harvey Weinstein: Netflix Is Winning Because It Has Vision

Harvey Weinstein
Ari Perilstein/Getty Images

Harvey Weinstein came out swinging in defense of Netflix at the Produced By: New York conference on Saturday.

The company’s recent forays into the film business cast a shadow over the gathering of producers, but Weinstein welcomed the company’s encroachment.

Of course, he has a vested interest in the streaming service’s success. Weinstein is producing a sequel to “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon” that will premiere simultaneously on Netflix and on Imax.

“The reason why [Netflix is] winning is they have a vision,” Weinstein said. “Most executives love money, they don’t love movies … they love movies,” he added.

Theater chains were in an uproar when the deal leaked, and major exhibitors such as Regal, AMC and Cinemark are boycotting the release. They claim that offering the film online at the same time it hits the bigscreen cannibalizes their business.

Weinstein said he was surprised by the outcry because “honestly, we thought Imax had that in hand.” He said it remains to be seen whether or not some theater chains will relent and screen the martial arts sequel, but that his personal preference would be to see the film in Imax.

The deal was about giving consumers choice, he argued, but for the Weinstein Co., it was also about securing a $60 million budget for a massive action film — the kind of picture the indie label rarely gets to make.

“They gave us a big canvas to paint on,” Weinstein said, one that included “all the toys and candy.”

The outspoken, often abrasive producer of such classics as “Pulp Fiction” and “The King’s Speech” also took aim at directors who say he is overly involved in the production of their movies, particularly the time spent in the editing bay. He has earned the moniker “Harvey Scissorhands” for the control he exerts on a movie’s final cut.

Most recently, Weinstein clashed with Korean director Bong Joon-ho on the release of the futuristic adventure “Snowpiercer.” Weinstein said he felt the film was muddled and would benefit from a tighter run-time. Bong was furious and refused to make the changes.

“To me it needed some straightening out,” said Weinstein, before adding that he showed it to five director friends who suggested cutting 40 minutes of the film.

Bong’s cut was eventually released simultaneously on demand and in theaters, becoming one of the year’s most popular VOD releases.

“We kept his original vision and it worked out for everybody because it became a celebrated movie,” Weinstein said.

Weinstein went on to note that directors such Giuseppe Tornatore, who released unedited versions of their films, have found that the altered editions he demanded played better. Roger Ebert argued that Weinstein’s truncated version of Tornatore’s “Cinema Paradiso” was an improvement on the director’s cut.

“I love directors cuts … they make me look like a genius,” Weinstein joked.

At 62, Weinstein shows no signs of slowing down.

Asked if he’d ever retire, the indie mogul quipped, “I would like to run a small Caribbean nation. Something with a military.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 7

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. EdmondDantes32 says:

    The directors cut of Cinema Paradiso is much much better than the edited version.

  2. Jean-Michel says:

    CINEMA PARADISO was recut by Tornatore in collaboration with producer Franco Cristaldi, after the first version flopped in Italy. The recut version premiered at Cannes ’89 and was picked up by Miramax. Not surprising that Harvey would be shameless enough to take credit for it, though.

    I’d also love to know where he and his five mysterious “director friends” thought there were 40 dispensable minutes in SNOWPIERCER, but then we know Harvey doesn’t care if recutting renders a movie literally incoherent. Try suffering through the Miramax recuts of TOM-YUM-GOONG or TEMPTRESS MOON, the latter of which Miramax is apparently so embarrassed by that they quietly went back to the director’s cut for the DVD release.

    As a final aside, the rogerebert.com article linked here was not actually written by Roger Ebert.

  3. nerdrage says:

    I dunno how much vision Netflix has, but Weinstein was right about Snowpiercer, what a MESS! Good movie to watch on a transcontinental flight and laugh at to alleviate boredom over Oklahoma, but that’s all I can say for it.

  4. faceinthemistylight says:

    Reblogged this on The Face in the Misty Light.

  5. Chicago860 says:

    But, Harvey, you heavily support a woman who just said that business doesn’t create jobs. How does that work, I mean, Netflix having vision…

More Film News from Variety