Cannes: Rolf de Heer Reflects on His Career

Charlie's Country Cannes 2014

Over the past two decades, Australian director Rolf de Heer has premiered four films in Cannes: “The Quiet Room” (1986), “Dance Me to My Song” (1998), “Ten Canoes” (2006) and now “Charlie’s Country.” Peter Debruge talked with the filmmaker about his career.

Variety: When “The Quiet Room” was invited to compete in 1996, was that your first time in Cannes?
De Heer: No, I first visited in 1985, and it totally changed my perception as to how to make films. I came completely ignorant of anything. We had made a small children’s feature film, and we put it in a suitcase and took it to Cannes to sell it. There had been no preparations made, so of course, the film never came out of the suitcase. There was such a hive of activity. Three times a day, 15 biplanes would fly past carrying Superman banners. Variety had 300-page editions, most of which were full-page ads for films. It gave me such wonderful perspective about where I was as a filmmaker — which was nowhere. I learned to think about things in terms of, “How do you make a film that will cut through this amount of noise?”

Variety: And how did you apply that lesson to your filmmaking?
De Heer: With “The Quiet Room,” because it easily could have been a kitchen-sink drama, I had a saying for myself when I began to work on it: “In the Greek tragedies, no one ever knew what the gods had for breakfast.” If you’re going to have a shot of a kettle on a stove, it had better be there for profoundly good reason. Or else it doesn’t belong.

Variety: Like “Ten Canoes,” your new film “Charlie’s Country” has an Aboriginal focus. What draws you this subject?
De Heer: I didn’t set out to make something indigenous. “Charlie’s Country” came up only because I have a relationship with (co-writer and star) David Gulpilil. He was in jail and he needed something to create a future in his life. The only thing I could do to help him was to make a film with him. In 2001, we had made “The Tracker” together, and for a long time, David was on to me about making another film with him — even before the first one.

Variety: Beyond your collaboration with Gulpilil, is there any connection between the three films?
De Heer: For me, making any film is too hard to do it more than once, so if I made a thriller that was very effective, the last thing I would want to do is make another thriller. After “Ten Canoes,” I made “Dr. Plonk,” which is a silent, black-and-white film. Each film is an exploration into a new part of cinema, and I work hard at reinventing a different way of thinking for each project.

Variety: That would explain the sheer range of subjects and styles in your career, from period jazz fantasy (“Dingo”) to post-apocalyptic satire (“Bad Boy Bubby”).
De Heer: After “Dingo,” I stopped the idea in my head that I had a career. I simply became someone who made films occasionally. As long as I keep the budgets low, I’m in the astonishingly lucky position of being able to finance precisely what I wish to do, but it’s not about a trajectory or anything like that.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More Film News from Variety