Three Lessons to Learn From the Oscars

3 lessons learned from the Oscars

Oscar winners were uncompromising, both in the way they were made and the stories they told

The Oscar victories for “12 Years a Slave,” “Gravity” and “Dallas Buyers Club” transcend their combined 13 trophies; they offer examples of successful risk-taking in subject matter, technology and funding.

1. Don’t underestimate films about the black experience.

“12 Years” will help put an end to the long-held Hollywood assumption that films about the black experience don’t sell internationally. So far, the pic has earned more than 65% of its $140 million-plus box office take -— and counting — outside of North America. (Fox Searchlight handles domestic, Lionsgate overseas.) That haul is hardly record-breaking, but it’s impressive for a movie budgeted at less than $20 million. Plus, its theatrical and ancillary money undoubtedly will get a boost post-Oscars.

Equally important, the success of the pic proves there’s an audience for films with tough subject matter, handled with artistry and without the sop of sentimental concessions. It will be even more encouraging if it motivates studios to trust serious pictures made by and starring blacks, beyond lightweight fare like “Barber Shop” and Tyler Perry movies.

2. Far-reaching technological ideas can lead to great cinematic art.

Warner Bros.’ “Gravity” is a technical game-changer, as much as “Jurassic Park” was. While that 1993 Steven Spielberg tale didn’t spawn many dinosaur movies, it left a giant filmmaking footprint by demonstrating the capabilities of CGI, which became widespread in everything from commercials to indie pics. “Gravity” will prove as influential. Its creative team extended the filmmaking capacity of computers. When the pic was in the planning stages, much of its jaw-dropping technology had never been conceived, much less attempted. And the use of traditional post-production techniques before the start of principal lensing reflected the radical thinking that’s often at the root of great art.

In addition, “Gravity” starred a near-solo performance by Sandra Bullock, helping dispel theories that women can’t carry action films. The picture’s global box office success ($705 million to date) is great news for creative risk-taking and for the prospect of further meaty roles for actresses over 40.

3. It doesn’t take a big budget and a traditional studio system to succeed.

“Dallas Buyers Club” leaves lessons that are both cautionary and inspirational. It marks the changing of the guard at Focus Features, since the label’s co-founder and longtime leader James Schamus exited shortly before the film was released, and the company will head in a different, more commercially-minded direction. And the movie’s Oscar success — including wins for actor and supporting actor — showed off scrappy indie ingenuity: The drama was filmed on a budget of less than $5 million, in 25 days, using only natural lighting. It was one of six best-picture contenders funded outside the traditional studio system (only Warner Bros.’ “Gravity,” Paramount’s “Nebraska” and Sony’s “Captain Phillips” fit that bill).

While the three films represented progress, in other areas, the 86th Academy Awards offered reminders that the movie biz has a long ways to go:

  • There were no women nominated for Oscar in direction, cinematography, editing, visual effects or the two sound categories.
  • Campaigning, with countless Q&A’s and receptions, overshadowed debates about film quality. Awards mania also is threatening to overwhelm the festival circuit.
  • On Feb. 23, a Reuters/Ipsos poll revealed that two-thirds of Americans had seen none of the nine best-picture contenders. That’s not a slam at the Oscars or the films — it’s a troubling clue to the state of moviegoing.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply

5 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Sly Wit says:

    “There were no females nominated for Oscar in direction, cinematography, editing, visual effects or the two sound categories.”

    Perhaps calling women “females” is part of the problem?

  2. Nicholas Bertagna says:

    I’m sorry, but what if there weren’t any women nominated for those categories? Why don’t you name a film that, in your opinion, was photographed by a woman and had a right to hold a spot among the nominees for more of a valuable reason than “there’s got to be a woman nominated”? If I were a woman I’d be incredibly angry at “pink quotas”, because they work under the assumption that women can’t make it on their own.

    If I were a woman director, I wouldn’t want to win just because I’m woman (like Bigelow did for The Hurt Locker, in my personal opinion). You need to be reminded that in a hundred years, when future film fans will want to have a look at masterpieces of the past, they’ll probably go on Wikipedia and look for who won the Oscars in 2014, and the Academy’s got a responsibility to make sure that whatever they’ll find is at least a decent film, not awards that are just a sop to shut the minorities’ mouths and make them be happy.

    As for your third argument in the post scriptum: most people are ignorant and there’s no way you can teach them to enjoy cultured films (which the Oscars, anyway, do not represent at best), unless maybe if you put a ban on superhero trash movies, so that they’ll be forced to go see some others.

    • timgray2013 says:

      I’m definitely not advocating quotas or tokenism. I wrote a longer version of the story, but some of it was cut for space. I explained that there are outreach programs in some guilds (SAG, Producers Guild) to get more diversity in hiring and give more people a chance. But many of the below-the-line guilds don’t have such a program. As a result, many women, even with good credentials, can’t get into the guilds. I’ve made the point several times in past articles: The Academy reflects the Hollywood industry. So I was saying that a lack of diversity in many categories is a clue that there’s a lack of diversity in the industry. But thanks for taking the time to read the story and to write a thoughtful comment.

  3. Linda says:

    These three films were amazing. I also enjoyed Blue Jasmine and Nebraska but you can’t compete with Gravity, 12 Years A Slave, and Dallas Buyers Club. The competition was difficult and I hope Hollywood keeps making great films like these.

  4. Heather says:

    Long way to go… Where the Asian’s at?

More Film News from Variety

Loading