Supreme Court Denies Review Over Rights to ‘Superman’

Superman DC Comics

The Supreme Court has denied review to a case brought by the heirs to Superman co-creator Joe Shuster that sought to reclaim the rights to the Man of Steel.

The Supreme Court’s action lets stand a lower court ruling in favor of DC Comics, which has blocked efforts by Shuster’s family members to reclaim copyrights in Superman. A provision of the Copyright Act allows authors to terminate and reclaim previous assignments of copyrights, although certain conditions must first be met.

The decision on Monday means that a lower court ruling stands in favor of DC Comics, which contended that a 1992 deal they made with Shuster’s sister Jean Peavy and Frank Shuster had given up their ability to reclaim the Superman copyrights. The deal included pension payments of about $25,000 per year.

But the Shuster family, represented by Marc Toberoff, contended that Shuster’s siblings could not have given up such a termination right in 1992 because none existed at the time. It was not until 1998 that termination rights were given to executors of an estate, instead of just children and spouses. The family also cited language of the Copyright Act that allows for termination “notwithstanding any agreement to the contrary.”

The petition for review drew amicus briefs from organizations including the The Society of Children’s Book Writers and Illustrators, which argued that it as the latest example of the Ninth Circuit’s “extreme hostility to copyright plaintiffs.”

But the Ninth Circuit, in its 2-1 decision, argued that the Shuster family’s reading of the Copyright Act would have conflicted with “extensive legislative history.”

DC Comics was represented by Daniel Petrocelli of O’Melveny & Myers.

The Supreme Court said that Chief Justice John Roberts took no part in the decision to deny review.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. The Supreme Court should have weighed in on this case: Creator’s Rights in the Comic Book Industry is going to become a Front-And-Center issue as blockbuster movies continue to be made and profits increase faster than rabbits on Cialis. This is classic David v Goliath stuff and well within the province of the Supreme Court to review (like they never read a comic book when they were kids, as if)! What happened to the two New York city kids who created Superman is a Great American Tragedy and their heirs need to get paid or know the reason why by the United States Supreme Court: anything less falls short of Truth, Justice and The American Way!

  2. Duder NME says:

    Why does Superman have a distended belly in that pic?

More Biz News from Variety

Loading