Netflix Bolsters Al Franken’s Arguments Against Comcast-TWC Merger

Al Franken
Alex Wong/Getty Images

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), so far the most visible Capitol Hill lawmaker to oppose Comcast’s merger with Time Warner Cable, is pointing to Netflix’s experience as an example of why the transaction should be blocked.

Netflix earlier this week announced its opposition to the merger, citing the greater leverage that it will give Comcast, particularly over providing content companies with access to its broadband customers.

On Thursday, Franken released a letter he got from Netflix after asking the company’s CEO, Reed Hastings, for his opinion of the merger and its affect on competition.

“Netflix has seen firsthand how Comcast can leverage its existing market power to extract arbitrary tolls to reach consumers, particularly from Internet video companies like Netflix that pose a competitive threat to Comcast’s own video services,” Netflix VP Christopher Libertelli wrote to Franken.

Libertelli then went on to cite the issue of the connection of one broadband network with another. In February, Netflix reached an “interconnection” agreement with Comcast to provide the capacity to deliver its video signal to Comcast subscribers.

Netflix says that in the past, such connections have been made with no fee. But with video quality degraded on Comcast, Netflix contends, it was forced to pay for improved delivery.

“That is where Comcast is able to leverage its market power most effectively,” Libertelli wrote. “It can restrict transit capacity into its network to force content providers into paying for uncongested interconnection.”

Franken said that Netflix’s experience “appears to illustrate the point” that the merger would “give Comcast too much leverage over everyone else on the Internet, resulting in higher prices and worse service for consumers.”

In a statement issued Thursday, Comcast’s Jennifer Khoury said that “Netflix’s argument is a House of Cards.”

As we and other industry observers have already noted, Netflix’s decision to reroute its Internet traffic was all about improving Netflix’s business model,” she said in a statement. “While it’s understandable for Netflix to try to make all Internet users pay for its costs of doing business (as opposed to just their customers), the company should at least be honest about its cost-shifting strategy.”

She noted that Comcast has many other agreements like the one with Netflix, as have other Internet providers. “And those agreements have not harmed consumers or increased costs for content providers. If anything, they have decreased the costs those providers would have paid to others,” she said.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 2

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. GaryD says:

    He”s is right on the merger. They are both regional monopolies, we don’t need a national monopoly. All cable and telephone franchise’s should have expiration dates, once their initial investment is recovered. The free market would save every consumer money, as competition keeps providers honest and makes them improve services to stay competitive. Al’s is load and screams his opponents down, not allowing them to get a word in. Not the brightest guy, but effective at capturing the medias attention.

More Biz News from Variety