Judge Sets Hearing on Accuser’s Effort to Withdraw Case Against Bryan Singer

Michael Egan speaks at a news
Mario Anzuoni/Reuters

U.S. District Judge Barry M. Kurren on Wednesday set a Sept. 9 hearing on Michael Egan’s motion to withdraw his case against director Bryan Singer, although Egan is seeking a dismissal without prejudice.

If Egan’s request is granted, he would be able to refile his claim against the director, who Egan accuses of sexually assaulting him when he was a minor. Singer denies the allegations.

Egan, representing himself in his filing of a motion to dismiss the claim against Singer, requested that it be made without “an award of costs or fees, in the interest of justice.”

Egan was left without counsel after his attorney, Jeff Herman, announced on July 29 that he was seeking to withdraw from the case, saying that relations with his client had “deteriorated.” Mark Gallagher, retained to represent Egan in Hawaii, where the case was filed, also asked to be removed from the case. On Wednesday, Kurren granted their requests to withdraw.

John C. Manly, an Irvine attorney who has been advising Egan, said last week that Herman’s withdrawal left Egan in limbo, with little time for a new legal team to take over the case before key court dates. A hearing also is scheduled for Sept. 9 on Singer’s effort to dismiss the case and for a summary judgment in his favor.

Buzzfeed reported last week that he and Singer’s  lawyer, Martin Singer, had agreed to settle the lawsuit for $100,000, but Egan refused.

Herman’s firm filed one other suit against Singer — by an unidentified British plaintiff — but that case was voluntarily withdrawn last month. Singer’s lawyers had sought a court order in which the plaintiff would have been required to put up cash collateral against case costs. Singer’s attorney said that no settlement was reached in that case.

In a statement sent to Variety last week, Martin Singer said that “Bryan and his team will continue to fight to clear his name and intend to pursue charges of malicious prosecution against Egan.” He called Egan and Herman’s case “an attempted shakedown of Bryan Singer.”

Herman’s firm continues to represent the British plaintiff, identified in court papers at John Doe 117, against producer Gary Goddard. Goddard has filed a motion to dismiss, with a hearing scheduled for Aug. 18.

Egan also filed claims against Goddard, Garth Ancier and David Neuman, but those were voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. Ancier has since filed a malicious prosecution suit against Egan and Herman.


Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. SLIM says:

    WOW !!!

  2. MattC says:

    Garth Ancier, filed a malicious prosecution action against Egan and Herman, and Herman has moved to withdraw as Egan’s counsel.Filing an action is one thing, but moving forward with it requires serving a copy on the defendant. Ancier said in a Facebook post Friday night, and sources confirmed, that Egan had been evading process servers and private investigators for five weeks. Friday, Ancier stated, Egan was found and served in a less-public location than a press conference: the men’s room of what Ancier called “an obscure Las Vegas casino.” What a con!

  3. PETER says:

    Where there’s smoke, there’s fire!

More Biz News from Variety