National Parks May Boost Filming Fees

National Park Filming Fees to Increase

When filmmakers shot Fox Searchlight’s upcoming “Wild” at Crater Lake National Park in Oregon, officials could not have been more helpful, says the movie’s location manager, Nancy Haecker.

What a contrast from the stereotype of government bureaucracy — and from issues with filming at national parks in the past when, for example, Alfred Hitchcock was unable to shoot the climatic chase scene in “North by Northwest” on Mount Rushmore, getting his shots instead on a studio mockup.

But now there’s a new concern: cost. The U.S. National Park Service and Dept. of the Interior are weighing a proposal to increase filming fees, and in some cases, double them.

The MPAA says the increases aren’t justified, and could discourage filming on federal lands. More than 50 lawmakers signed a letter urging Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell and Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack not to boost fees.

Location manager Doug Dresser, who recently shot a car commercial at Death Valley National Monument, maintained the competitive climate doesn’t support the hikes. “States are trying to eliminate or reduce fees for filming in state parks, and obviously there are foreign governments trying to attract filming. It doesn’t make sense (for the national parks) to price themselves out of the market.”

The proposed fee schedule would charge $1,000 per day for productions with 51-70 cast and crew members, and $1,500 per day for projects employing more people. According to the MPAA, the increases are from 33% to 100% higher than current prices. The fees are in addition to the repayment of the government’s costs for restoration of a site after any disruption caused by filming.

Some have argued, however, that the cost is hardly out of line when it comes to the budgets of many studio productions.

A spokesman for the park service said that responses to comments on the proposed fee schedule are still being drafted, and it is hoped that a final schedule will be issued early this fall.

The fee increase would raise money for backlogged repair projects, resource preservation, renovations and law enforcement. The National Park Service issued about 3,150 permits for commercial film production and photography in 2012, the only year for which statistics are available.

For years, studios were able to shoot with no location fee because the park service was prohibited from collecting money for location permits. But a law passed in 2000 allowed the service to establish a “reasonable” fee for filming. The MPAA, under then-chairman Jack Valenti, even supported the legislation, testifying before Congress that films that shoot on public lands are “the most enticing kind of tourism ad you can imagine.”

The effort to increase fees assumes that even in the face of global competition there’s nothing like a national park stamped all over a picture. Shooting there comes with restrictions, Dresser says. “But the tradeoff is, you get some of the most spectacular landscapes in the world.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 4

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Pubilus says:

    First of all, compared to location fees in general, these fees are a pittance. Its a hollow threat to imply that other locations will be chosen because of the fee, particularly to “foreign governments” that would be prohibitively expensive to move a whole production to.

    Secondly, the National Park Service’s mission is not to compete “in the market” for locations. That is a good indication of the problem with the film/entertainment industry perspective right there. The NPS is not in it for the money. Its not their mission. Managing films are a distraction from the mission, and not a requirement of the mission. Filming privileges are not a commodity, they are just that – a privilege. Just requesting to film and willingness to pay a fee does not guarantee approval – thankfully.

    Finally, no matter what anyone says, the costs incurred to manage the vast majority of location shoots is not covered by the fees and recovery costs. It just isn’t.

    • robbie goldstein says:

      I was a location manager for 30 years. I can’t argue about this fee increase. It is reasonable and the percentage increase quoted does not mean it should not happen. A production is getting unbelievable access to land and locations they need for their story. If there was land adjacent to a national park owned by a private party giving the film the same look, That private party would charge 3-5 times as much most likely. Take the bargain make your movies call it a day

    • Pubilus says:

      Oh, and “But a law passed in 2000 allowed the service to establish a “reasonable” fee for filming” is misleading. It *requires* a fee, not merely “allows” it. And the location fee schedule is uniform nationally.

  2. Heading to a national park this summer? Take this thriller with you.

More Artisans News from Variety