SEO Follies: ‘Walking Dead’ Actress? Well, Sort of, but…

SEO Follies: 'Walking Dead' Actress? Well,

Linking the ricin mailing suspect to the AMC drama is a familiar stretch

I was eating lunch when the news hit that a “‘Walking Dead’ actress” had been implicated in mailing ricin-tinged letters to President Obama and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

Then I clicked on the link: “Shannon who?” I thought.

Having seen every episode of the AMC zombie drama, it was a little jarring. For a supposed “Walking Dead” actress, I wouldn’t know who this woman was if she bit me.

To be fair, almost everyone spun that angle — not just Variety, but the Hollywood Reporter and Huffington Post and virtually any other site interested in traffic.

Welcome to the Search Engine Optimization Follies. See, it’s very simple. Pick a term likely to get a lot of traffic anyway, then use that. Say, George Clooney. I have met George Clooney, even interviewed George Clooney. I’m sure my posts would get more traffic if they were written by George Clooney, or at least offered tantalizing info about him.

But since I really have no excuse to write about George Clooney, it’s kind of gratuitous to use his name.

Which doesn’t stop anyone from trying — in the same way people picked the highest-profile credit associated with Shannon Rogers Richardson, “The Walking Dead,” and ran with that. Never mind that even the show’s former exec producer, Glen Mazzara, apparently had no idea who she is.

Most of the time, it’s fairly harmless and not worth making a federal case out of it (which is more than can be said for Ms. Richardson should the allegations be true), reflecting the kind of crafty tricks local TV stations have long played in trying to tease viewers into their newcasts.

Moreover, it clearly works, which is why Huffington Post and the Drudge Report are so brazen about using such salacious teases. Indeed, the former’s please-click-through headlines have inspired a Twitter account, HuffPo Spoilers, specifically devoted to decoding its cryptic messages.

Still, there’s no denying that these practices can also be misleading. And they do have a way of dragging people who were just minding their own business into stories that really have nothing to do with them.

I wonder what George Clooney would have to say about that. Or even someone genuinely associated with “The Walking Dead” who I’ve actually heard of.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 2

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Kate says:

    This actress has no credits listed on her IMDb page, yet the media keeps leading this story with “Walking Dead” and “Vampire Diaries” Actress Lead Suspect in Ricin-blah blah blah…..”. It’s clear to me that this “actress” was merely an EXTRA in those tv shows. If I were an exec producer on either of those shows, I would set the media straight and ask them to stop using attention-grabbing teasers for popular headlines when this woman had little to nothing to do with those TV shows.

  2. Jack Swan says:

    After all that name-dropping, I feel you are now slightly more attractive.

More Voices News from Variety