Newtown Anniversary: Why Nothing Changed in Response (Again)

Newtown Anniversary: Why Nothing Was Done

Media did their job, but thanks to political gridlock another tragedy went unaddressed

Looking back on the column I wrote in the immediate aftermath of the horrific school shooting in Newtown, Conn. on Dec. 14, 2012, it appears my analysis was about half-right. But it was correct in the way that most mattered — that inertia would win out, and ultimately nothing would be done.

SEE ALSO: A Year After Newtown, Entertainment Biz Resists Scrutiny

Responding to columnist George Will’s statement on ABC’s “This Week” that the challenges associated with curbing such events were politically and practically insurmountable, I suggested another hurdle involved media: “Because after a few days, those anchors will pack up and return to New York and D.C. And Newtown will join Aurora and too many others on the tragic roster of names in our fast-fading memories.”

To its credit, the media’s sustained interest in the story surpassed expectations. Despite a famously short attention span made shorter by the current digital environment, news outlets stuck with their coverage and helped hold lawmakers’ feet to the fire.

Yet the elusive, complex nature of what causes societal violence — and the tendency for the usual suspects to deflect blame from their sacred cows — finally made it easier for legislators to do what they do best in this age of partisan gridlock, which is give speeches, express grief and move on.

Republicans cited mental illness, and the prevalence of violence in a mass entertainment media many despise for reasons that have as much to do with Hollywood’s liberal politics as its explicit content. The Brent Bozell-backed Culture and Media Institute, for example, issued research this week under the headline, “Networks Remember Newtown with 39 Gun Deaths Week Before Anniversary,” citing a cable-TV roster “awash in violence.”

Democrats — while no strangers to crusading against violent movies, videogames and music — gravitated toward gun restrictions, citing the combustible mix of other factors with weapons that can fire dozens of bullets in a matter of moments.

While the media generally performed better than anticipated under the circumstances, one can argue a hyperbolic fear of the Obama administration — partially fueled by conservative media figures — has contributed to a climate that makes efforts to curb guns or ammunition decidedly unlikely, at least while the current president remains in office. Small wonder the National Rifle Assn.’s Wayne LaPierre plucked at this nerve, accusing President Obama of “trying to take away” guns by pushing for relatively modest restrictions that, according to polling data, enjoy widespread support.

As a result, despite the impassioned rhetoric, attempts to enact legislation went nowhere. And like past outrages — some of which, like mass killing during a “The Dark Knight Rises” showing in Aurora, Colo., landed directly on the entertainment industry’s doorstep — calls for soul-searching about a violence-soaked media culture, or showering psychopaths with coveted attention, won’t shove those genies back into the bottle either.

In one respect, there’s perhaps some comfort to be derived from evidence that people haven’t become completely inured to these horrible events.

Still, there is also something wearying about the public ritual of seeking answers — and trying to craft some sort of response — when neither is apt to be forthcoming. There are simply too many variables to ever pin acts of violence directly on a single factor, and too many impediments to concerted action, at least for now, to prevent another Newtown, Aurora or Columbine.

Where does that leave us? Caught in a vicious cycle, as politicians and pundits keep repeating themselves. Only the names and locations change as the scenes are reenacted, with camera crews descending on another community of heartsick relatives.

In that regard, the media is complicit primarily in its short memory — acting like whatever just happened, and what’s being said, might somehow alter these dynamics. It’s hardly cynical to see that as naive, and perhaps self-serving.

Because honestly, if a school full of dead children won’t spur lawmakers, what ever will? And if the last one didn’t, why should we have faith the next one would?

(Pictured: Victims of gun violence since the Newtown tragedy were listed at a demonstration in the Connecticut city this summer.)

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Chili Boots says:

    Your Answer:

    Because nothing happened there except a grossly inept side-show expected to rush America into gun control. Only an idiot would buy
    into that false-flag disaster, from the insane, rambling Coroner, to
    the easily identified “crisis actors”, the charade fell apart, totally and immediately. No one died there. What’s gone is your credibility.

  2. David Coker says:

    There is one rule everyone should live by when it comes to being armed. It is much better to have a firearm and not need it, than it is to need a firearm and not have it. If the Commies, fascists and liberals want to take away high capacity magazines and ban rifles that are styled after those in the military then convince me that doing so will stop the carnage. They can’t and they know it. Someone hijacks a school bus and drives it off a cliff. So now we ban school buses and cliffs. The attitude of the left is scripted by childhood indoctrination brought about by the media and in some places the public schools. That is how the Commies and their ilk have undermined what it means to be an American. They did it through the public schools with funding from the Rockefellers and their ilk. Read all about it in “The Leipzig Connection”. Would you like an example of how the media is now the propaganda ministry for the government? YouTube “Traitor or Patriot”. The real meaning of Chief Justice Roberts decision on ACA. Nothing like you have been told.

  3. oracle2world says:

    Uh, that school system had recently approved its security plan. It did not work.

    Name names who worked on the plan, reviewed it, approved it, and maybe even were supposed to test it. See if any of those folks had any clue about security, had background checks, had written a plan before.

    That is how you make the world a better place.

  4. John Shea says:

    ‘”There are simply too many variables to ever pin acts of violence directly on a single factor…”
    There is only ONE variable and factor, which is the decision of one or two people to kill other people.

  5. Reblogged this on Remembering Homicide Victims and commented:
    Check it out.

More Voices News from Variety