TV Review: Esquire’s ‘White Collar Brawlers’

White Collar Brawlers Review on Esquire

Pitting office mates against each other, this "Fight Club" knockoff doesn't pack much punch

Representing Esquire network’s first serious bid to get noticed, “White Collar Brawlers” is so conceptually distasteful that it’s easy to overlook the banality of its execution. Like many reality shows, there’s an underlying movie-inspired conceit — in this case “Fight Club,” except the goal here is to violate the “first rule” by getting everybody talking about it. Still, however appealing donning gloves to pummel the guy in the adjacent cubicle might sound, the result is fairly substandard reality fare — a show that’s more about the “journey” and six-week training process than the slow-build to the fisticuffs at the end of each hourlong episode.

The premiere deals with financial planners and former roommates Andrew Devine and Ryan Sainsott, who had a vaguely described financial dispute over their old apartment. Competitive at work, they’re both eager to step into the ring, they say, and settle old scores, filling their direct-to-camera interviews with typical macho bravado.

Once assigned to respective trainers, however, self-doubt begins to creep into the conversation, largely because neither guy is exactly a natural pugilist. Moreover, the two work out in the same gym, so they can watch each other as they fret about their own progress, seemingly just to maximize the pre-fight hype. Where’s Don King when you need him?

Mostly, the show leaves you with questions, like how the workplaces of those who participate can seemingly sanction and embrace such an event, and what happens in that inevitable episode (at least, should the show go beyond its initial six-round order) when someone is actually disproportionately good and beats the living daylights out of the guy sitting adjacent to him. Now that ought to add a slightly uncomfortable dynamic to the next staff meeting.

Without giving too much away, that’s hardly the case in the premiere, and Devine vs. Sainsott (as the press release too cutely characterizes the fight) is perhaps inevitably a letdown — about as compelling as “Celebrity Boxing” as the two awkwardly flail away, despite all the urgent music and slow motion used to foster a sense of excitement. (The series hails from the company behind “Here Comes Honey Boo Boo,” so they know a thing or two about massaging reality.)

In that respect, “White Collar Brawlers” — a slightly incongruous addition to Esquire’s Bravo-for-men-like lineup of lifestyle fare — is less upsetting for what it is than what it says. Namely, the show reinforces a presumption that the male audience, in particular, is so numb and resistant to anything that isn’t sports the only way to rouse it is with poor dumb slobs agreeing to get punched in the head for our amusement.

From that perspective, when it comes to word-of-mouth about “White Collar Brawlers,” let’s hope the first rule of “Fight Club” really does apply.

TV Review: Esquire's 'White Collar Brawlers'

(Series; Esquire Network, Tues. Nov. 19, 10 p.m.)


Produced by Authentic Entertainment.


Executive producers, Lauren Lexton, Tom Rogan, J.C. Begley. 60 MIN.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Nelson Alonso says:

    Where are we as people or mankind when its becomes an acceptable practice, in resorting to violence in return for a job promotion or trying to settle hatred of one another, instead of seeking peaceful intelligent methods. This is not the way of correcting problems with each other.

    As a brown skin Latin man, you wonder why minorities image are view negatively and then compliment when treated inappropriately. Couldn’t the Esquire Network showcase something more positive in a message/show? What’s next the wild wild west, a show with people sporting guns and shooting each other, winner is the person who isn’t dead? Can’t someone create positive change in programs without violence, showing we’re all better then brawling for a solution, I only saw two episodes and decided not to see any others, very sad. Find solutions using your mind, not your fist, SHAME E.N. with White Collar Brawlers

  2. Frank W says:

    So….the people programming the Esquire network have forgotten that Esquire is a classy magazine and not Maxim. I would not have thought a show about fighting would be on Esquire. Maybe a show that would talk about White Collar Brawlers and other pop culture things, but not actually a show of White Collar workers beating themselves up. So, go back to be G4 or whatever cable channel was absorbed to make Esquire if the programmers don’t get it.

  3. Frank W says:

    First rule of White Collar Brawlers is not to talk about White Collar Brawlers.

More TV News from Variety