Howard Kurtz’ On-Air Mea Culpa Clouds His Future at CNN

Howard Kurtz CNN

Howard Kurtz referred to his own work as “sloppy and inexcusable,” and acknowledged that as a media critic, he should be held to a higher standard. So was his on-air mea culpa an act of refreshing transparency, or a fatal blow to his credibility?

In short, is Kurtz – formerly with the Washington Post, having recently cut ties to the Daily Beast/Newsweek – too unreliable to host something called “Reliable Sources?”

CNN and Kurtz do deserve considerable credit for addressing the latest issue head-on, inviting two other journalists, NPR’s David Folkenflik and Politico’s Dylan Byers, to grill the host involving a piece Kurtz did about Jason Collins coming out as the first gay U.S. athlete in a major team sport. Kurtz admitted he hadn’t fully read the Sports Illustrated article or watched an ABC interview in its entirety before mischaracterizing part of Collins’ account, and then being slow to correct the record.

Yet they did Kurtz no favors by not just focusing on the current misstep, but rehashing a number of other conspicuous errors he has been forced to acknowledge in the past, perhaps the most damaging involving Rep. Darrell Issa in 2011.

After those opening 15 minutes, it was sort of tough watching Kurtz step back into the host role, serving as the maestro of media ethics.

Now, to be fair, Kurtz is right when he says all journalists make mistakes, and I’ll acknowledge a personal screw-up years ago very similar to the incomplete-facts snafu involving Collins. Having read that a cow had its neck slit so contestants could drink the blood on CBS’ “Survivor,” I mentioned the cow having been “slaughtered.” But the cow wasn’t killed, and I was absolutely wrong for referring to the episode without having actually seen it.

As Kurtz noted, amid thousands of stories and millions of words, a few do not a career make. He apologized, and essentially pleaded for what amounts to another chance.

It’s equally true that news outlets — especially television — are bad about publicly correcting errors, which is why devoting time to Kurtz’s own shortcomings felt so bracing, although I’m sure to much of the world, it probably looked like an unnecessary level of navel-gazing.

That said, Kurtz isn’t just any journalist. And Folkenflik and Byers hammered him on a handful of stories, each of which was embarrassing enough at the time it’s hard to imagine repeating an error of that magnitude. (Since the aforementioned “Survivor” slip, I make it a point not to criticize a reality show without actually having watched it.)

“Sloppy?” Absolutely. “Inexcusable?” Ultimately, that part’s going to be up to CNN.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 2

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. EK says:

    Accuracy trumps sloppy scoops and always will. When being first also means being worst it’s more a reflection of electronic journalism vs. print … but there’s no turning back so it can only be hoped that journos of all ilks will take Brian’s lead and check before spewing.

  2. The race to be first… best… loudest… fanned… retweeted… and fill every second of the 24-hour news cycle is a recipe for mistakes. And apologies? Like the old adage says: Once the toothpaste is out of the tube… Journalism needs slow down and reclaim its best self: responsible, thorough, ethical and fair.

More TV News from Variety