‘Daily Show’s’ Devastating ‘Good/Bad’ Critique Hits CNN Where They Live (VIDEO)

Daily Show's Devastating Critique of CNN

Jon Stewart zeroes in on what appears to be a mandate to dumb down CNN's presentation

The Daily Show’s” research department has a way of seizing upon gaffes in the most unflattering (and funny) way possible. Yet the piece Jon Stewart aired on CNN Tuesday — and its desire to boil down complex questions to “Is it a good thing or a bad thing?” — appeared to expose a larger, dumb-it-down strategy in particularly devastating fashion.

As Stewart noted, the totality of the segment felt like a conscious attempt to reduce complicated issues to their “mood-ring essence,” with clips of Wolf Blitzer (an especially egregious offender in this regard) and others interrupting guests who were trying to make nuanced points and prodding them to boil the whole matter down to “good” or “bad.”

Admittedly, some of these issues are over the heads of the average viewer, who doesn’t devote all of his or her time to wonky dissection of policy. Still, there’s an implied disdain for the audience in the seemingly delivered-on-high mandate to pore over a discussion for a few seconds before the audience’s presumed attention span starts to stray, at which point some unseen producer is yelling in the anchor’s ear “OK, enough. Good or bad already!”

CNN has brought some ambitious programming to the channel since CEO Jeff Zucker’s arrival, including documentaries like “Blackfish” and the upcoming “Pandora’s Promise.” Jake Tapper’s new show, “The Lead,” is generally smart and incisive, with the host possessing an especially good feel for pop-culture stories, which are often terribly sensationalized in the cable-news space. Programs featuring Morgan Spurlock and Anthony Bourdain have sought to present information in an entertaining way, without undermining the channel’s brand.

Other new wrinkles, however — such as the morning program “New Day” — reflect a tendency to pander, as well as an underlying sense CNN’s presentation of the news has to be either sexed up or dumbed down in order to compete with more fiery partisan alternatives on Fox News and MSNBC.

While that’s not necessarily a surprise, I feel pretty comfortable saying it isn’t a good thing.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. proscriptus says:

    “Admittedly, some of these issues are over the heads of the average viewer?” What a tepid way to undermine your own argument. As Stewart himself points out, they have 168 hours a week in which to explain them. NPR does legitimate analysis all day long and still has time for frickin’ Garrison Keillor and four hours of atonal wailing saxophone jazz.

    • odinbolt says:

      But they don’t have ‘all day’. They only have as long as the average attention span of their viewers. One must assume CNN has done the marketing research to discover their stories are ‘just too dang complicated’ for their viewers. Another example of the race to the bottom with the infotainment industry – catering to the increasing intellectual laziness and confirmation bias we see pandered to across the ‘news’ industry.

  2. Reblogged this on Theresa Wheeler's Blog and commented:
    …and I loved every minute of it.

More TV News from Variety

Loading