Questioning Oscars’ Renewed Dalliance with Seth MacFarlane (Opinion)

oscars seth macfarlane

Critiques of recent kudofest ignored?

The Oscars haven’t had the same host in consecutive years since Billy Crystal in 1996-97, but the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences has reportedly declared its willingness to ride the Seth MacFarlane train again next year.

Why the Academy would be willing to do this is at once clear and frustratingly murky.

Though the Academy itself hasn’t acknowledged the invitation, Pete Hammond of Deadline declared confirmation of what was reported initially by Just Jared. The original story came two days after the Academy officially announced the return of Oscar producers Craig Zadan and Neil Meron, the folks who helped bring MacFarlane into the Oscar fold in the first place.

The discussion might be moot, because however gratifying the offer is to MacFarlane, he doesn’t necessarily have the time to dedicate to another Oscar ceremony nor the desire to submit himself to the heated critiques that tagged his first effort in February. MacFarlane himself publicly stated before and after the Oscars that hosting would be a one-time job for him. Jimmy Kimmel, among others, still might be more likely to end up with the March 2 gig.

In any case, though Zadan, Meron and MacFarlane had their defenders, the reaction to the Oscarcast was certainly mixed enough to call into question why the Academy would look for a repeat performance. The answer comes in two parts: 1) improved ratings in the latest show, though those more likely reflect a good year for popular movies in the Academy Awards nominations, and 2) the virtues of continuity.

In other words, even though everyone outside of James Franco has gotten at least as positive a reception for hosting the Oscars as MacFarlane (dating back to the last time Crystal turned in a repeat performance), suddenly the time is now for “steady as she goes.” The Irony Committee will rule in favor of the fact that this comes as the Academy, because of Board of Governor term limits, will have new presidents in consecutive years for the first time in two decades.

It should go without saying — though it clearly doesn’t — that continuity for the sake of continuity is no virtue. It won’t take anyone long to think of plenty of ideas that were best left abandoned. After all, two years of Franco teaming up with Anne Hathaway would also have qualified as continuity.

While you can certainly concede that no Oscar host is going to please everyone, you can also acknowledge that an Oscar host can please some without offending large slices of their audience. And dismissing those who took offense as unable to get or take a joke is too facile — plenty got the joke but just didn’t think it was funny. (To his credit, in a more serious context, MacFarlane also realizes that some things others find funny can be truly offensive.)

Hiding behind the continuity facade, while ignoring the misgivings people had about the Oscarcast, is not the Academy’s best look.

Of course, the Academy’s Oscar problems extend beyond the MacFarlane issue. They also include the org’s return invite for Zadan and Meron, who produced arguably the most self-serving Oscarcast in history, and given the glitches and weird time allotments, not even an exceedingly competent one.

No one doubts how hard it is to find people with the time to lead the Oscars and the skin thick enough to withstand the bricks of criticism. But if the reports of the MacFarlane invitation are true, either the powers that be at the Academy have surrendered their ambition for greatness, or they have put the personal preferences of a few ahead of all other considerations.

Neither is comforting.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 11

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Matt says:

    I enjoyed Seth very much as a host, and his song and dance skills were a delightful surprise. So every bit didn’t go over well; that’s the nature of the beast in these PC times and with the hugely splintered viewership demographics the producers are trying to attract and please.

  2. George Valentin says:

    Bring Seth back!

    • Patty says:

      James Franco was a victim of terrible direction and really bad lines………Judd Apatow wrote him some stuff and the “writers’ didn’t use it???????????……..I liked Seth very much…..My neices and nephews turned it BECAUSE of Seth…….THEY know his work and love it……You got the demographicis you what……….I think James Franco deserves another chance…Ann Hathaway was a handful………..How about Seth Rogen and James???????…….NOW you got it right!…….Patty

  3. The Kingslayer says:

    Erm didn’t John Stewart host the Oscar twice in a row ?

  4. Mark says:

    I personally enjoyed it. I don’t think I have ever been able to watch a full oscars ceremony, but Seth made you wonder what was next, and like it or not that’s a good thing. To chalk the ratings spike to a good crop of movies is also ludicrous, every year has its fair share of great movies. When did America lose its sense of humor, seriously, all we do now is complain.

    • Jon Weisman says:

      Not every year has its fair share of movies that have been as popular as this past year. The nominees for this year’s Oscars had higher combined box office than any group from the past several years.

      Thinking you can do better than Seth MacFarlane does not mean America has lost the ability to laugh.

  5. Jennifer says:

    Umm not entirely sure this is true especially at the beginning where it states that they haven’t had back one same person since billy crystal which is wrong. The oscars had Ricky gervais twice.

  6. Joe Gillis says:

    So the way to “fix” the Academy Awards telecast, which, by an overwhelming consensus, was considered to be a broken affair that offended many, left others cold, and wallowed in self-indulgence, is by…having the exact same people come back and do the exact same thing?

    That’s it. I’m moving over to the Golden Globes for good.

  7. StillBreathing says:

    Seth is an offensive idiot, and mildly amusing at best; I would never call any of his material actually “funny.” I’m all for poking fun at Hollywood but laughing at seeing women’s boobs is just juvenile especially when some Oscar-winning roles involved rape scenes (Charlize). He needs to go away.

More Film News from Variety