Producers of ‘Twilight’ Parody Sue Lionsgate, Summit Entertainment

"Twilight" Zone: Producers of Parody Sue

The makers of a parody of the “Twilight” franchise have filed a whopping $500 million suit against Lionsgate and Summit Entertainment, claiming that they have engaged in “anti-competitive” conduct by abusing intellectual property law and squelching their efforts to find a distributor for their movie.

The suit, filed in federal court in New York, runs 219 pages and was filed by Between the Lines Prods., which made a parody called “Twiharder,” intended to coincide with the release of “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn (Part Two).” It claims that a cease-and-desist letter sent by the defendants scared off potential distributors, even though legal advisers concluded that the makers of “Twiharder” were within their rights to go forward with their project under the terms of “fair use” doctrine.

The plaintiffs also claim that Lionsgate and Summit have registered more than a dozen names for the franchise with the trademark office, “thereby multiplying the universe of potential infringers exponentially.” They claim that the intent is “to utilize the ‘tentpole’ model as a leveraging mechanism to prop up a full-scale, 360-degree IP monopoly in which all the statutory rights granted by the Copyright Act simply become interchangeable with (and/or subsumed by) the statutory privileges granted by the Trademark Act.”

In December, Warner Bros. successfully stopped a parody of “The Hobbit” called “Age of Hobbits,” claiming that its release would create marketplace confusion in violation of trademark law. A judge agreed, ruling that the term “Hobbit” was unique to the J.R.R. Tolkien series.

The suit against Lionsgate, however, seems to claim that the mere cease-and-desist effort by Lionsgate and Summit’s legal team was enough to thwart off potential distributors and insurers.

In the suit, the makers of “Twiharder” say that “the unpredictability of the ‘Fair Use’ doctrine has granted Defendants an unfettered license to threaten scores of independent artists with generic, stock allegations of copyright infringement and trademark infringement.”

A spokesman for Lionsgate said they had no comment.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Frank W says:

    In the late 90s, ICM sent a cease and desist letter to my friend who had a company called (something like) Inventive Creatives of Miami, but the initials in the web address contained a variation of the initials ICM (I think IC-M). His was a graphic design business and the letter was such a joke saying how their brand was well know world-wide, etc. YEAH, Known world-wide to the FILM industry and housewives who read stories in People about actors leaving them for CAA maybe. I told him to fight it, but he said he wouldn’t, he really didn’t care for the name anyway and had already planned to abandon the domain (back when the costs were more than they are now).

    The whole thing about fighting the right to parody is getting out of hand. Are not these the same people who make Scary Movie? You can’t trademark “Twihards” because it’s public domain.

    I made a parody movie poster and I would love to distribute it, but I used part of a photo not in public domain that contained a character’s costume owned by a large corporation. Everyone received credit on the poster–including the public domain sources–and I’m sure I’m covered under fair use, but in this atmosphere, I would never even attempt to let it out past my portfolio.

More Film News from Variety

Loading