Oscar Race: Are Handicappers Too Bullish on Scorsese’s ‘Wall Street’?

"The Wolf of Wall Street"

Even films that don't have best picture-potential can have distinct pleasures

I worry about overpopulation, I worry about recent industry layoffs and I worry that it’s only 50-some days until Christmas. But today, my top concern is “The Wolf of Wall Street,” since Paramount confirmed it will indeed open Dec. 25.

I’m not worried about the film itself. With Martin Scorsese at the helm, and with that subject matter, that cast (Leonardo DiCaprio et al) and that writer (Terence Winter), you know it’s going to be worthwhile. But I fear that anticipation is so high it will do the pic a disservice: Even if it’s great, that won’t be enough for some.

I worry that awards-centric journalists (myself included) are putting too much pressure on the film. Awards have become the cart leading the horse. Toronto used to be a showcase for films that needed nurturing; now it’s become a campaign stop. And as each new film is screened, at the New York or upcoming AFI festivals, there are more questions about awards potential than about its virtues, artistic aims or even commercial viability.

It’s been such a strong year that we don’t need a last-minute entrant to make the race interesting. But most awards pundits have been talking about the same films since early September and, in an ADD era, we’re craving a great plot twist.

The only big films largely unseen are Sony’s “American Hustle,” from David O. Russell; Peter Jackson’s “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” (Warner Bros.-New Line-MGM) and Paramount’s “Wolf.” The Scorsese film has received more attention because its backstory is so interesting: The post-production team are in a race against time, the November delivery date has passed, the initial cut is said to be extremely long, and so on.

A few years ago David Fincher’s “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” and Stephen Daldry’s “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close” were last- minute entrants and there was media anticipation whether these would be awards gamechangers. Many Oscar pundits seemed annoyed that they weren’t. In September, DreamWorks’ “The Fifth Estate” got similar treatment at Toronto. After so many best-picture possibilities at Telluride and Venice, there was a media backlash: This isn’t a best-picture contender! What are you trying to pull?

Even though people are lamenting the tentpole mentality and crying out for more intelligent, adult-targeted films, they are lashing out at anything that’s not a best-picture frontrunner. Despite the kudos possibilities for some elements of “The Fifth Estate,” such as Tobias Schliessler’s cinematography and Benedict Cumberbatch’s performance, the film was written off, which was furthered by its low box office. There are plenty of other films this year that are thoughtful and trying to do something interesting. In many cases, media members sneer at the mere mention of these titles, because hard work and artistic ambitions are not enough.

In my mind, “Wolf of Wall Street” and “Hustle” are already winners, because they are tackling important topics. If either (or both!) turns out to throw a curve ball into an interesting awards race, great. If not, that’s OK too. So this is a reminder to myself and to everyone else: Try to see it as a film first, and kudos fodder second.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 6

Leave a Reply

6 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Alex says:

    I can’t wait for this film to come out, but I am sure the Academy will go for soemthing ‘cornier’, so I don’t have any expectations at all. Actually, speaking of Scorsese and Leo, I think the 2007 Oscars were actually the last ones with an interesting winner, After that… well, even Sandra Bullock got an Oscar. Yes, the same actress who did that thing with Melissa McCarthy… whatever that was.

    • Ken from Toronto says:

      “That thing with Melissa McCarthy” was called THE HEAT…and it was hilarious. You should really cut Ms. Bullock some slack — she was wonderful as Harper Lee in INFAMOUS, startling in her small role in CRASH…and she’s unbelievably good in the sensational GRAVITY.

      • Alex says:

        P.S. I do agree with you by the way, she was great in Crash, but I wonder if she was really acting.

      • Alex says:

        Thank you for your comment Ken from Toronto. Don’t get me wrong, I hate haters, but I honestly do not believe that film (The Heat) was funny at all. I don’t laugh with the very same formula, that we can see on so many films throughout the years and sitcoms alike. I think it was a terrible film, terrible acting as well, Predictable, cheap humor. As for Sandra Bullock, I think she is extremely overrated, but she has the audiences on her side, but let’s face it, did she deserve her Oscar? And as for Gravity, it was refreshing to read so many comments on Facebook yesterday saying how overrated and boring it was. If you were watching the film on DVD, on your TV, do you think you’d like it the same? Is the script really that good? I am glad to discuss films and acting, always a pleasure. Have a great day Ken.

  2. BJ Markel says:

    Thank for your thoughtful and insightful comment, Julienne.

More Film News from Variety

Loading