MGM’s IPO: Not So Fast

MGM's IPO: Not So Fast

Insiders say that company is exploring other options to cash out shareholders, including a private placement

While “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey,” and “Skyfall” have dramatically improved MGM’s bottom line, the company’s initial public offering may still be a long ways off.

Knowledgeable sources say the Lion won’t likely launch an IPO any time in the near future. In the meantime, MGM has been exploring other options to help cash out its shareholders.

Among them: Very early discussions of launching a $400 million to $500 million private placement, according to individuals with direct knowledge of the discussions. That trade would allow MGM to give its investors some liquidity, and wouldn’t derail its efforts to go public down the line.

MGM began its IPO process last year, and it’s already allowed the company to gauge the market’s interest in an initial public offering as well as taking the temperature of possible contenders for an acquisition of the studio. Industry observers said MGM’s efforts have made it clear that the current owners — a mix of hedge funds including Anchorage Capital, Solus Alternative Asset Management and Highland Capital — are an unnatural fit for a film studio and are looking for a way to cash out on their investment.

MGM declined to comment on any discussion of a private placement.

Much of what MGM would disclose during an IPO process is also similar to disclosures for a sale process, and some observers have gone so far as to suggest that MGM’s IPO movements could act as a dual-track process — something that would allow the company to either go public or sell. (The company has denied that it is looking to sell.)

Wall Street favors steady, predictable revenue streams for companies looking to go public. That has traditionally posed a challenge for film studios, whose earnings are often quite the opposite: Volatile, unpredictable, and relying on an opaque accounting structure that can be difficult to understand. The film biz is particularly tricky because releases are front-loaded with marketing and production costs, so even the most boffo pics can show losses in their first weeks of release.

“Wall street likes to see steady and very predictable earnings,” said Lindsay Conner, co-chair of the entertainment and media practice at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips. “That’s something that eludes even the most successful film companies because hits may come from films that aren’t necessarily expected to be the key drivers of profit, and there are certain seasons of the year when the film industry is more active and less active. All of that leads to quarterly swings which give Wall Street analysts heartburn.”

MGM’s library of predictable cashflows, the promise of future “Bond” installments and the next two “Hobbit” films will help stabilize the Lion’s stock price should it launch an IPO. But the challenge for film companies is churning out a steady stream of hits to maintain that stock price. While the company is focused on remakes and other known properties (Its next releases are “G.I. Joe: Retaliation,” “Carrie” and “Robocop”), those films aren’t guaranteed hits the way that “Hobbit” and Bond installments would be.

Because of this, investors in MGM will have to put an enterprise value on the rest of the company. That includes the Lion’s television activities, which MGM has pledged to grow.

Investors will also be looking at the Lion’s capital structure, which includes a $650 million credit facility the company refinanced earlier this year. They’ll be interested to see how much of the library has yet to be exploited through SVOD and other deals.

MGM’s 2012 revenue rose 97% in 2012 over the previous year, with adjusted earnings up 48% to $286 million, according to the Lion’s 2012 year-end financial statement issued Monday.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. JOE S HILL says:

    I am very crittical of Metro Goldwyn Mayer,since it is pretty much a studio,that now has to depend
    on financial partners,like Sony,to co-release many of their main movies. never,in all the years that
    i have watched MGM/UA,have i seen this studio,in such a condition,,and the previous decade also
    tells me,that there has been serious mismanagement issues,which i belive led to their Chapter 11
    situation. and the business with Tom Cruise managing United Artists,was a serious joke! so now,
    with “THE HOBIT” and “SKYFALL”,MGM’s financials look okay,,but i still suspect,that there is way
    more going on with this studio,then what is on the surface,,because MGM has had a stormy history
    with its corporate dealings,for quite a while-and with Sony,who previously acquired the studio,along with several other partners back in late 2004,i am still convinced that there still some difficulty here!

More Film News from Variety

Loading