Leonardo DiCaprio and ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ Howl for Oscars

Wolf of Wall Street Golden globes

“The Wolf of Wall Street” screened today for media members. Was it worth the wait? You betcha. When awards nominations are announced next week, the question isn’t whether the Martin Scorsese film will be included but rather how many nods it will get.

Paramount has imposed a review embargo until Dec. 17 for the film, so details will be restrained. But this may be the only time you see restraint and “Wolf” used in the same sentence.

Within the first five minutes, the film pops off the screen with energy, style, sex, profanity and drugs. It’s a film about excess and at three hours, it’s a marathon of all those elements. So conservative awards voters may be put off.

But in general, audiences and voters love the familiar mixed with the new: They like to see  a favorite star or filmmaker but be surprised when they go in new directions, and “Wolf” delivers. There are some trademark Scorsese elements like uniformly strong performances, stylish camera moves, a great soundtrack and, most important, smart observations about jungle behavior in urban settings. But this is 180 degrees from “Hugo” and different from his other films. And Leonardo DiCaprio shows new sides of himself, including his talent as a physical comic.

In terms of awards, nominations seem likely for the picture, Scorsese, DiCaprio, scripter Terence Winter, Jonah Hill and Margot Robbie and all below-the-line work.

There is always anticipation over a Scorsese film and this one has, as a bonus, DiCaprio and a script by Winter, the TV maestro making a rare bigscreen foray. Adding to the excitement was the backstory: Will it be finished in time or pushed into 2014? Wait, it’s a comedy? It’s three hours long?

In terms of awards, this has an advantage over much of its competition: Voters will see it. Most Academy members are working folks with limited time, so rely on word of mouth when deciding what to see. But even if an Acad member has seen nothing so far in 2013 because they’ve been shooting in Siberia, this will be among the handful of must-sees, due to its pedigree.

Every year, there are a handful of awards hopefuls that start screening late, because they are in post up until the last minute. This year, the final three were Sony’s “American Hustle,” the Warner Bros.-New Line-MGM “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug,” and this one. (In past years, the latecomers have included “Gran Torino,” “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo,” “Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close” and “Django Unchained.”) They have had mixed results with awards. This film is likely to wind up on the positive side of that.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 10

Leave a Reply

10 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Sue says:

    Horrible. Way too long. I love DiCaprio and Scorsese but for me it was Goodfellas re-do, and GF was much better. 3 hours I can’t get back. Painful.

  2. J.E.Vizzusi says:

    How can you juror a vote for Best Picture for a Film not yet released to the public?

    Does the audience not count anymore or first box office receipts?

    Dumbfounded. .. jv

  3. cadavra says:

    DiCaprio has starred in four of Scorsese’s last five narrative features. He’s hardly a “bonus” anymore; “fixture” is more like it.

  4. Tim says:

    “When awards nominations are announced next week, the question isn’t whether the Martin Scorsese film will be included but rather how many nods it will get.”

    What awards nominations? Oscar noms aren’t until January. You might want to be a bit more specific.

  5. Chu Hyon says:

    Leonardo, that huge red candle must have hurt.

  6. Brian Apple says:

    Well, I’m a liberal and Í tend to avoid movies with gratuitous sex. Why would I go and watch a Hollywood movie for the sex scenes when even more explicit scenes are available on the net at the click of a button?

  7. Jake says:

    Please let it finally be Leonardo dicaprio’s year as well as any Adams

  8. J.E.Vizzusi says:

    Maybe Academy voters are being bamboozled, I just don’t know anymore. Christmas releases are touch and go and nothing in this subject matter rings with bells with holly!

    The advance publicity for a Oscar nod has always been with us, no getting rid of it now But we must let audiences make judgement first.

    Controversy and a slow Box Office may be a influence as well.

    With the Coen Bros. chiming in, will be a tight race for nominations for sure.

    Jv

More Film News from Variety

Loading