How Much Harry Potter Will be in J.K. Rowling’s New Movie?

How Much Harry Potter Will be

The Harry Potter books may have infinite horcruxes, as it seems to be the franchise that never dies.

Warner Bros. and J.K. Rowling sent fans into a frenzy Thursday with the announcement that Rowling’s wizarding textbook, “Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them,” will be turned into a movie with the book’s fictitious author, 21-year-old Newt Scamander, as the focus.

However, Rowling made it clear that the book and the upcoming movie is neither a sequel nor a prequel to the seven-book megahit and the eight-movie run that raked in $7 billion over a decade. Does that mean that Harry, Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley will be absent from the upcoming movie?

“The laws and customs of the hidden magical society will be familiar to anyone who has read the Harry Potter books or seen the films, but Newt’s story will start in New York, seventy years before Harry’s gets underway,” Rowling said in a statement.

But Rowling later stated that it was Warner Bros. who first approached her with the idea of a “Fantastic Beasts” movie.

“Having lived for so long in my fictional universe, I feel very protective of it and I already knew a lot about Newt,” she said of her decision agreeing to write the screenplay.

With Harry Potter being such a massive success for Warner Bros., it makes sense for the new movie to orbit around the Potter world, as “The Hobbit” did with “Lord of the Rings” characters who, despite not appearing in J.R.R. Tolkien’s “Hobbit” book were added into the feature film to lure fans of the LOTR franchise. Plus, the famous Hogwarts trio actually play a small role in the book.

“Fantastic Beasts” is a textbook of Potter and Weasley’s, and the two appear to have written notes all throughout the text, hinting to happenings in the Potter books and movies.

Seeing how “Fantastic Beasts” will take place in New York in 1918 and the Harry Potter series occurred in England in the ’90s, flash-forwards could be a way to integrate the Hogwarts gang. Time travel is possible in the wizarding world as well. In “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban,” Granger used a time turner jump from time to time.

During the entry for the Basilisk, when the author says that there have been no sightings of the beast for four hundred years, one of the characters playfully wrote “that’s what you think,” alluding to the Basilisk Potter faced off against in “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.” It’s one of many nods to the original series.

Scamander isn’t completely removed from the gang, either. He did graduate from Hogwarts, Potter’s alma mater, and the book includes a foreword written by Albus Dumbledore, the school’s headmaster and prominent figure in Potter’s life. Also, Scamander’s grandson married Luna Lovegood, one of Potter’s classmates.

There’s also a question about how the new film will look. With 75 beasts in the textbook, many of which were featured in the original books and movies, it’s possible that the new movie could be even more CGI-heavy than the Harry Potter films.

The movies became increasingly CGI-centric, with dramatic effects in the final battle at Hogwarts and the Potter-Voldemort last stand. There are also several beasts in the textbook that didn’t have their chance to be introduced in the Potter series, so it’s unclear which magical species will be introduced for the first time in “Fantastic Beasts” and which will return.

But one of the most crucial issues of all is casting: Who will be up to playing the 21-year-old bookish Scamander? With Rowling so protective of the character, it’s likely that she will have a large say in the decision.

“I always said that I would only revisit the wizarding world if I had an idea that I was really excited about and this is it,” she stated.

Until then, Potterheads will have plenty of time to speculate, as no release date has been announced yet.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 7

Leave a Reply

7 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Celsa says:

    Thanks for the good writeup. It actually used to be
    a entertainment account it. Glance advanced to faar delivered agreeable from you!

    By the way, how can we be in contact?

  2. Benjamin says:

    There won’t be any flash-forwards or any other cheesy attempts at creating links between the two series. Rowling has too much common sense.

  3. J. K. Rowling has gotten her Hollywood cred the hard way: by maintaining her veto power over critical creative decisions on the 8 movies made from her books. I applaud her discipline, vision and talent! I hope that Steve Kloves is on speed dial as she conjures up her first screenplay, as he has done such a magical job of keeping her stardust intact on the silver screen, so far! Write on, J. K. Rowling!

  4. Christopher Hobe Morrison says:

    I just wish people wouldn’t refer to the Potter creations as a franchise. Literary creations aren’t the same as hamburgers!

    • Matt says:

      …Not sure if you know what franchise means, because you make it sound as though its insulting to the harry potter series to be known as a franchise.

  5. stephen melinger says:

    It’s amazing how well the original Potter movies were cast. This allowed the characters to grow and change as people do as they age. It is crucial then that Newt be chosen carefully. I don’t know if Rowling herself knows the New York of the 1920s as well as she knows England. This may be a problem. Someone should develop Spielberg’s “Young Sherlock Holmes” character. The movie began so promisingly and then fell apart.

  6. Hermione Granger says:

    Great horcrux reference

More Film News from Variety

Loading