Plaintiffs in Ed Asner Suit Blast SAG-AFTRA Over $132 Million

Ed Asner
Debra L Rothenberg/FilmMagic

Hearing set for Jan. 6

Ed Asner and 15 other plaintiffs have blistered SAG-AFTRA over alleged mishandling of $132 million in residuals and foreign royalties a month after the union asked a federal judge to dismiss the complaint.

In a filing opposing the dismissal motion in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, the plaintiffs portrayed the union as reckless in how it handles funds that it’s supposed to distribute to performers.

“SAG-AFTRA simply does not record what is earned but it willy-nilly converts checks as it sees fit, by either endorsing checks made out to performers and placing same into its purported Trust Account, or by holding onto performers checks for months if not years on end to the ongoing detriment of its members who depend on these earnings to live,” the plaintiffs said. “SAG-AFTRA has clearly taken advantage of its role as a fiduciary and must be held accountable for misfeasance, malfeasance and nonfeasance in these  and other regards.”

The filing accused SAG-AFTRA of an “end run” around U.S. Supreme Court decisions that limit a union’s ability to extract “inappropriate” dues from unwilling members and accused the union of borrowing against residuals and foreign funds. And it derided the presence of a foreign funds tracker on the union web site, adding, “Expecting a member to initiate a distribution belies SAG-AFTRA’s responsibilities in this regard.”

Judge Manuel Real has scheduled a Jan. 6 hearing on the dismissal motion.

The union filed the 18-page motion on Nov. 20, asserting that the plaintiffs’ claims under state law should be tossed because they are “completely preempted by federal labor law” and that the plaintiffs “do not have the authority to sue on behalf of anyone other than themselves.”

SEE ALSO: SAG-AFTRA Seeks Dismissal of Amended Ed Asner Suit Over $130 Million

The plaintiffs’ filing blasted those assertions, saying, “the United States Supreme Court has held that state law claims are not preempted if they are based on rights that exist independent of a labor contract.”

SAG-AFTRA also insisted in the Nov. 20 filing that it had complied with the demand for access to review of its financial records — attempting to parry extensive allegations that members and elected leaders have been kept in the dark about the funds. The plaintiffs cited the union’s “entrenched” refusal to permit inspections of records and provide copies of the contracts covering distribution of the foreign funds.

“Plaintiffs justifiably fear that other inappropriate expenditures if not improvident investment and losses have taken place,” it said.

The plaintiffs also cited the need for union records because of an embezzlement scheme within the SAG residuals department that was disclosed by SAG in December, 2010.

The original suit was filed on May 24. Real narrowed the issues on Oct. 7, allowing the suit to include the issue of residuals and three of the 16 plaintiffs to proceed with their claims on unpaid foreign royalties.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 4

Leave a Reply

4 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. I am not an actor (never been very good at CREATION {ethos} PLASTIC), nor can I recollect more than a dew drop of my high school teacher Joe Pudlos’ “accounting, just one subject of actuarial science!/!” class, except something “eviscerial” dynamically about THE COMPANYS’ HEALTH, but, if you (an individual) know something about the complexity of accounting”.

  2. Matt Mulhern says:

    Your validity is in question you whore.

  3. I think it is a little early to thanks them since the validity of their claim is in question.

  4. Larry Gilman says:

    THANK YOU ED ASNER AND OTHERS FOR STANDING UP FOR US. FIRST FOR RESEARCHING THIS, AND THEN FOR FOLLOWING UP. YOU ARE OUR VOICE IN A UNION SUPPOSED TO BE FOR US, PROTECTING US, AND DOING EVERYTHING IN THEIR POWER TO COLLECT FOR US, WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY DUE. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR HAVING THE HEART, PERSEVERANCE AND FORTITUDE FOR STANDING FOR US.

More Film News from Variety

Loading